VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Propellers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-05-2014, 01:40 PM
breister breister is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,231
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobCollins(AA) View Post
I have a question for which someone might have a answer. Why isn't it possible to feather the prop on a RV during a engine failure which would increase the glide range since the drag created by a windmilling prop would be non existent .
Safety.

If your prop governor fails in flight, you can still fly the airplane.

If a full-feathering prop fails in flight, you cannot fly with it feathered.

If your engine fails, you are going down anyway. Fine pitch reduces your glide, but not so much that under ordinary circumstances you cannot pick a place to land. It could even be a benefit, helping you slow.

I've never heard that full-feathering, or even Beta-capable, props are heavier. They might be, but I don't believe it has anything to do with why single engine planes are generally equipped with props that fail to fine pitch.

Twin engine airplanes often have props that fail to feather for the same reason - safety. If one engine or one prop fails, you can still fly the airplane.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-05-2014, 01:54 PM
Sig600 Sig600 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KRTS
Posts: 1,798
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by breister View Post
Safety.

If your prop governor fails in flight, you can still fly the airplane.

If a full-feathering prop fails in flight, you cannot fly with it feathered.

If your engine fails, you are going down anyway. Fine pitch reduces your glide, but not so much that under ordinary circumstances you cannot pick a place to land. It could even be a benefit, helping you slow.

I've never heard that full-feathering, or even Beta-capable, props are heavier. They might be, but I don't believe it has anything to do with why single engine planes are generally equipped with props that fail to fine pitch.

Twin engine airplanes often have props that fail to feather for the same reason - safety. If one engine or one prop fails, you can still fly the airplane.

Feathering props usually have counter weights and an unfeathering accumulator.
__________________
Next?, TBD
IAR-823, SOLD
RV-8, SOLD
RV-7, SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-06-2014, 11:47 AM
Lindamon Lindamon is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 51
Default

I have a three blade MT with counter weights and acro governor on my -7. When I idle the engine and pull the prop to low pitch, you can feel the acceleration. Practicing engine outs over my home field, I found myself pushing the prop back in on final most of the time as it was obvious I would overshoot by a lot when flying my normal close pattern. It's a significant difference. Maybe one of these days I will try to figure out what the glide ratio increase is, but for now I have pulling the prop to low pitch as part of my engine out checklist.
__________________
Damon Wack
RV-7
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.