RV-7 vs aircraft #2

[flyboy1963]

this is all theoretical, until you fly a bit. lots of good advice, so I'll add more.
go sit and/or fly in the -14, then find a partner with a hangar, and build the thing. I think it's everything you want in a 7, with all the things you'd want to improve, already done!
+1 to the Glastar, it was the only thing on my list as #2 when I bought my -9a....really just liked the view out of the RV better!

[PilotRPI]

I was in the same exact boat. RV7/9 was at the top of my list, and Kitfox was a close second. After a lot of careful thought about what I wanted in a plane, I decided on the RV7. So while the planes are very different, your conundrum (sp?) may not be that unusual. I ultimately decided I wanted the performance, and that a tailwheel RV7 would take me to 95% of the grass/dirt strips near me.

I never did any sheetmetal work. I took the EAA class, and learned that nothing about it is difficult. I think anyone can learn it, it just takes some guts to jump in, and taking the time and care to do the work right. I have the two practice kits in my shop, and will do those over the next month, then start the tail in September.

Good luck with whatever you decide!

[DanBaier]

It's a little hard to respond without knowing what #2 is.

FWIW...Keep in mind I'm not the sharpest tack in the box -

I'd suggest that you think about either a 7 or 9 (fly in each - have your wife fly in each, and pick the one you like - very difficult to make a mistake). Personally, I lean toward the 7 (for you taildragger sounds right).

As to #2, buy one now to keep your flying skills up while you're building and accomplish the training you mentioned. Just buy it right - so you can sell it right.

I've got nothing against the toolbox - but I would recommend that you go right to the tail kit (and get a little help to get off to a good start).

Relative to qualifying for A&P - the requirements that you should focus on are part of 8900.1 (see http://fsims.faa.gov/PICDetail.aspx?...Vol.5,Ch5,Sec2 ). However, it's not at all unusual to hear of other anecdotal requirements thrown out by FSDO staff that present insurmountable barriers even in the face of the written guidance. You should get to know someone at the FSDO (who isn't going to retire or transfer any time soon) and an A&P/IA. Do your build and an engine overhaul. Have the IA function much as a tech counselor on the former and do the latter under supervision of the IA. Keep them aware of what you're doing and ask for advice. If you do buy a #2 to fly while you're building, you could do "owner-assisted" annuals and as much work as you can that can count toward your requirements. Keep a record of what you do. When you're done, you'll be much better able to get a letter of recommendation. (Better to have the camel in the tent p****ng out than the other way around. I also would recommend the Lycoming engine school - it was excellent.) It may take some determination.

Hope that helps.

Dan

[Bruinpilot]

Thanks for the top notch advice! I can't wait to start the tool kit and possibly take a sheet metal class soon. Dan thanks for the good words, I didn't know there was a lycoming school. I would love that, I will look into it. I love motors, I rebuilt my pickups motor, nothing like a lycoming, but a lot of fun!

[bhassel]

So - I have to ask...what's the number 2 plane?

Bob

[MeAndMyToys]

Thats my plan anyway Building the 7 first, a decision made easy by getting the tail kit as a totally unexpected surprise for Xmas from my wife
Just started on the fuselage on the 7.
One of the Bearhawk's will be next.