|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

07-01-2014, 09:33 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: texas
Posts: 175
|
|
building question
On drawing page 26 and 31 of the rv4 plans set, there shows to be a 3/4 x 3/4 x 1/8 piece of angle that attaches to the WD-403L&R. It is in addition to the lower longeron and it is angling up toward the F404 bulkhead.
I cannot find the detail of this anywhere in the plans. Am I missing something?
|

07-01-2014, 04:14 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: near Harrogate, England
Posts: 391
|
|
You should have two pieces of angle, somewhat splayed ie the angle is greater than 90. Run from WD403 back to F404. Need to fit around F402.
But I agree that the details are sketchy at best. I haven't quite got there yet, hence no pictures. Perhaps someone can post a few plus a "this is how I did it".
Good luck!
Chris
__________________
Chris Mitchell
Repeat offender;
RV-8, QB, built, flown 150 hours, sold;
RV-4 - attempted repair, rebuild and remediation - abandoned and junked   ;
RV-4 fuselage and wing kits - both at QB stage;
2015-2018 dues paid!
|

07-01-2014, 10:16 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: texas
Posts: 175
|
|
Anchor
I don't mean the splayed angles on the floorboard, I mean the angle that is a few inches above that.
I see how it attaches to the WD-403 and goes through the 402 bulkhead, but I am not sure how it attaches to the 404 bulkhead or is just riveted to the fuselage side skin.
I am considering making another anchor similar to the F-443 and bolt it to the wing spar like the center tunnel is done.
Suggestions or comments??
|

07-02-2014, 12:01 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: near Harrogate, England
Posts: 391
|
|
Sorry - my mistake - too idle to go look at the plans out in the garage.
Front end - look at romeolima.com, fuselage section. There a few photos of how to deal with the front end, with an extra gusset.
The length of angle is definitely riveted to the fuselage skin for its entire length.
At the aft end I think your idea of a bracket sounds good. Look at drawing 27, section E-E'; there is a convenient bolt at the lateral margin where the angle runs to, though if the rear of F413 and the rear of this piece of angle are at the same level at F403, the bolt hole is a little high. I think the limiting factor is the front of F428 as this will determine a minimum angle for this bit of angle. (We need a name or number for it!).
Unless anyone chimes in with better info I think this is what I'll be doing.
Chris
__________________
Chris Mitchell
Repeat offender;
RV-8, QB, built, flown 150 hours, sold;
RV-4 - attempted repair, rebuild and remediation - abandoned and junked   ;
RV-4 fuselage and wing kits - both at QB stage;
2015-2018 dues paid!
|

07-02-2014, 07:29 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Freericksburg, VA
Posts: 624
|
|
The angle piece in question is riveted its entire length to the side skin. There is no additional attachment to the main spar bulkhead. At the forward end the thickness of the angle has to be milled such that it will lay flush with the side skin while overlapping the firewall weldement as shown.
Does that help?
__________________
Richard Bibb
RV-4 N144KT
Fredericksburg, VA
KEZF
|

07-02-2014, 08:27 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 55
|
|
Spence,
I would be glad to email you a picture of that stringer. Send me a PM with your email and it will be on the way.
Ross Scroggs
RV4-3911 Canopy fun
|

07-02-2014, 09:04 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Bainbridge Island, WA
Posts: 333
|
|
Photos
__________________
Brian Vickers
Bainbridge Island, WA
RV4
|

07-02-2014, 10:15 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Freericksburg, VA
Posts: 624
|
|
OK so much for going from memory. My earlier comment should have said the aft end was the one that needed milling to lie flush wit the skin. And it does technically attach to the wing spar bulkhead as it is riveted to the piece that frames the spar opening. The previous pictures should make this clear?.
__________________
Richard Bibb
RV-4 N144KT
Fredericksburg, VA
KEZF
|

07-02-2014, 10:38 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
|
|
If it's like the RV-6, that stiffener is too thin to "mill away".
This is what the RV-6 plans show at the similar location at the main spar bulkhead - a notch and a joggle in one side of the angle -

__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
|

07-02-2014, 11:02 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Freericksburg, VA
Posts: 624
|
|
The -4 is different. There is a single 0.063 plate that the angle has to overlap. So milling (IIRC correctly the plans state "file away material as required" or something like that. Since the angle is 0.125 thick you remove half (or in practice a bit less to get the angle to lay flat against the plate piece of the bulkhead assembly and the fuselage skin.
__________________
Richard Bibb
RV-4 N144KT
Fredericksburg, VA
KEZF
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:04 PM.
|