VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-17-2014, 07:55 PM
denbobp denbobp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: California
Posts: 98
Default Prop performance after shortening

I bought an io360 a3b6d with McCauley prop. From a mooney 201. The prop as is right now 73 inches on one blade and two inches of curl on the other blade. The prop shop suggested for experimental purposes that he could shorten them both to 70 inches and would be safe.
He didn't know how it would effect the performance on an 8 A.
Does anybody have any data with a shorter prop or should I just put on whirlwind blades into the McCauley hub and sell the remaining good blade?
Looking forward to any responses
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-17-2014, 08:15 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,768
Default PLEASE DON'T!

I always recommend against shortening a metal prop beyond the manufacturer's limit. There has most likely been no testing for harmonics and they can be deadly.

If it cannot be OK'd for certified aircraft, it probably won't be any safer on an experimental. I've seen too many modified metal props come apart.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-17-2014, 08:19 PM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,516
Default

You probably can not do better in efficiency than the RV200 blade. Might be something to investigate with performance in mind.
__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-17-2014, 08:23 PM
RV6_flyer's Avatar
RV6_flyer RV6_flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC25
Posts: 3,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
I always recommend against shortening a metal prop beyond the manufacturer's limit. There has most likely been no testing for harmonics and they can be deadly.

If it cannot be OK'd for certified aircraft, it probably won't be any safer on an experimental. I've seen too many modified metal props come apart.
The T-18s were using shortened metals props and there were a lot of them come apart. As Mel says, do not go shorter than the prop manufacturer recommends. There is a safety reason why they do not recommend shorter than a certain length.
__________________
Gary A. Sobek
NC25 RV-6
Flying
3,400+ hours
Where is N157GS
Building RV-8 S/N: 80012

To most people, the sky is the limit.
To those who love aviation, the sky is home.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-17-2014, 08:31 PM
rockwoodrv9 rockwoodrv9 is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Meridian ID, Aspen CO, Okemos MI
Posts: 2,645
Default

The propeller does not know if it is on an experimental or certified. If it isn't good enough for a certified, do you really want to fly behind it? I am taking a guess, but the amount of force needed to bend the ends could be enough to damage the rest of the prop? There has to be a better place to save money.
__________________
rockwoodrv9a
Williamston MI
O-320 D2A
Awaiting DAR Inspection
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-17-2014, 11:02 PM
denbobp denbobp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: California
Posts: 98
Default Wtb mcCauly blade 73 inch

Anybody have a single blade to make my mooney c/s prop usable for my project?...
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-17-2014, 11:06 PM
PCHunt PCHunt is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,670
Default

I bought an RV-6 with a McCauley C/S prop on it. Great performance, and very smooth.

Being a bit cautious, I looked up the hub and blade model numbers, and couldn't find a match. So I called McCauley, and talked with a very knowledgeable tech guy, who informed me that the hub/blade combination had never been tested for harmonics, and that the blades were specifically prohibited from operation on a "Non-counterweight" Lycoming engines.

I have removed that prop, and replaced it with a Whirlwind 200RV prop, which I am very happy with.

You might want to "Google" metal prop harmonics.

One more data point.
__________________
Pete Hunt, [San Diego] VAF #1069
RV-6, RV-6A, T-6G
ATP, CFII, A&P

2020 Donation+, Gladly Sent
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-18-2014, 09:48 PM
denbobp denbobp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: California
Posts: 98
Default Your McCauley prop

What did you do with the prop maybe one of those blades might fit. I do have a counterweight engine.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-18-2014, 11:57 PM
PCHunt PCHunt is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,670
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by denbobp View Post
What did you do with the prop maybe one of those blades might fit. I do have a counterweight engine.
Denbob, if you are asking me about my old McCauley prop that I removed, the blades are not airworthy.

The tech guy at McCauley said that because they had been operated for an unknown number of hours on the wrong kind of Lycoming engine, they might have been subjected to harmonic vibration fatigue, and that the factory considered them to be not airworthy. They even went to the trouble to write me a letter stating the above, probably to cover themselves for liability.

Prop blades have been intentionally damaged beyond repair to ensure that they won't end up flying again.
__________________
Pete Hunt, [San Diego] VAF #1069
RV-6, RV-6A, T-6G
ATP, CFII, A&P

2020 Donation+, Gladly Sent
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-21-2014, 05:09 PM
denbobp denbobp is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: California
Posts: 98
Default Still need the mccauley blade

Any one have one for purchase?@
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:26 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.