VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Traditional Aircraft Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-08-2014, 09:55 PM
koda2 koda2 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: West Texas
Posts: 282
Default Vetterman small exhaust system

Anyone flying an O-360 with the newer Vettermans 1 1/2" tubing. Performance or other issues?

Dave A.
6 build
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-09-2014, 10:14 AM
Clint B Clint B is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hot Springs SD
Posts: 90
Default

HI Dave, We have quite a few of the 1.5" exhausts out and flying. All of the performance numbers are on vettermanexhaust.com. We have been very impressed with the performance, and all around aspects of the exhaust. This is the exhaust that Larry is running on his 7A. Give us a call if you have any questions, we like to talk airplanes! Clint Busenitz/ Vetterman Exhaust (605) 891-1290
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-09-2014, 10:33 AM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

I have the 4 pipe 1.5" system on the -8, expect it will just fine.

Had the same pipes on the -7A, it trued out a couple knots faster than Vans numbers for the -7A.

Go for it, it's a good exhaust system. Unlike the trike vrs tail wheel discussion, opinions on this subject are worth considering.
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-09-2014, 03:16 PM
billdianne's Avatar
billdianne billdianne is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 96
Default

David,
I just ordered the 4 pipe system and was told it only comes in the 1.75" size. Only the crossover was available in the 1.5 inch size. Did I get some bad information?
__________________
Bill
RV-8
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-09-2014, 03:34 PM
David-aviator David-aviator is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by billdianne View Post
David,
I just ordered the 4 pipe system and was told it only comes in the 1.75" size. Only the crossover was available in the 1.5 inch size. Did I get some bad information?
I will measure it again and get back to you.

I'm back. I screwed up the measurement this morning - they are 1.75". As they say, measure twice cut once, it applies here also.
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!

Last edited by David-aviator : 01-09-2014 at 03:48 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-09-2014, 04:18 PM
koda2 koda2 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: West Texas
Posts: 282
Default Hours?

David,
How many hours did you get on the 1.5" system? Did yours have the mufflers installed?
What I was really wondering was, if any one had accumulated lots of hours on the system.

Although I am still trying to get my head around the concept that restricting airflow cross-sectional area by 25%, increases performance, the added performance noted on the dyno tests is really not as important to me as longevity and no long-term adverse affects on the engine.

Also, even if performance wasn't a factor, the smaller pipes and lighter weights (2lbs) are a positive in a crowded engine compartment.

If it is as good or better than the original Vetterman system it is a winner.

Dave A.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-09-2014, 05:39 PM
Clint B Clint B is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hot Springs SD
Posts: 90
Default

As far as longevity is concerned, none of the 1.5" systems have been flying long enough to have high time. We are convinced that the 1.5" system is actually stronger then the standard system because we use a very short piece of .049 tubing to make the transition from 1.75 at the flange to 1.5" for the primary pipes. The weld at the flange is the weak point for any exhaust system so having the .049 there is a beef up.
The basic design of the 1.5" system is exactly the same as the 1.75" "original" system, of which there are several thousand flying, so we expect good service life.
As to the performance increase, the smaller pipes make the exhaust gas speed up, which improves scavenging, up to the point where there is simply too much exhaust gas for the pipe to handle (over 2700 rpm)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-09-2014, 05:57 PM
terry.mortimore terry.mortimore is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sault Ste Marie, Ontario Canada
Posts: 236
Default Vetterman small exhaust system

Hi Clint:

Any reason that the smaller tubes can't be used to build the rest of the systems?

I have 6A with a O-320 equipped with a Superior cold air intake. Will the small tube systems be offered in the future?

I'm looking for a crossover system.

The exhaust is the next thing on the list, but I can wait a while yet if it will be offered in the future.

Terry

Last edited by terry.mortimore : 01-09-2014 at 06:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-09-2014, 06:14 PM
RetiredRacer RetiredRacer is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ipswich QLD Australia
Posts: 245
Default Don't forget the 0-233/0-235!!

Clint,
Is there any chance Vettermans will have a re-think about the smaller engines sometime in the future?
I had one of your 1 3/4" systems on my 0-235 9a and when I heard about the 1 1/2", I grabbed a set off you. Now that Vetterman's have found the small pipes work so well on the larger engines, it makes sense that smaller than 1 1/2" pipes would work better for the LSA 0-233, as well as some more weight saving.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-09-2014, 07:52 PM
Clint B Clint B is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Hot Springs SD
Posts: 90
Default

HI Terry, we may consider building other model of exhausts using 1.5" tubing, and can build certain models on a special order basis.
As far as using smaller than 1.5" for the 0-233/0-235, the amount of weight savings would be less then a half pound of weight I would guess.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:24 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.