VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Alternative Engines
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-04-2014, 04:48 PM
rzbill's Avatar
rzbill rzbill is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,690
Default

I was thinking about the fuel scaling problem when watching the UK video. I wonder if that was about the limit of his fuel. Fun toy but that's all maybe.
__________________
Bill Pendergrass
ME/AE '82
RV-7A: Flying since April 15, 2012. 850 hrs
YIO-360-M1B, mags, CS, GRT EX and WS H1s & A/P, Navworx
Unpainted, polished....kinda'... Eyeballin' vinyl really hard.
Yeah. The boss got a Silhouette Cameo 4 Xmas 2019.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-04-2014, 09:36 PM
Steve Melton's Avatar
Steve Melton Steve Melton is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,787
Default extended glide

it seems they also have a model rated at 88 lbs thrust. what if it could run on 100LL so no additional fuel needed except maybe some oil to mix inline. estimate complete weight of mounted unit = 15 lb. minimal drag of unit with bullet nose cone and trail cone that are jettisoned prior to start, about the same drag of a external mounted camera. example, you're over lake Michigan and don't want to get your feet wet if you have an engine out. I believe 88 lbs thrust could sustain flight in a 9A in ground effect.
__________________
Steve Melton
Cincinnati, OH
RV-9A, Tip-up, Superior O-320, roller lifters, 160HP, WW 200RV, dual impulse slick mags, oil pressure = 65 psi, EGT = 1300F, flight hours = 800+ for all

Simplicity is the art in design.
My Artwork is freely given and published and cannot be patented.
www.rvplasticparts.com

Last edited by Steve Melton : 01-05-2014 at 09:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-05-2014, 04:38 AM
SvingenB SvingenB is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Norway, Stj?rdal
Posts: 598
Default

The Cri Cri

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Y-AL3YfWzM
__________________
RV-4 #4520, Slow built
B Svingen
RV-4 Project Log
Onex Project Log

EAA Chapter 573 Norway
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-05-2014, 10:06 AM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
Default

There was an airshow act with a couple of small turbines mounted in the wing tips, saw it at and airshow at Lake Tahoe about 10 years ago.

The main reason for the tip mounting was smoke generation as I recall, but he could also taxi with just them----------was funny to see him land, shut off the engine, and continue to taxi on to the parking area with the prop stopped.

I think the plane was a Giles or a One Design?? I have no idea if he is still performing with this setup.
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-05-2014, 10:35 AM
Steve Melton's Avatar
Steve Melton Steve Melton is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,787
Default turbine mounting position

mounting two of them, one in each wing tip, could be an option because you could fair them in nicely with the wing tip but may suffer from asymmetric thrust if one failed. what about one turbine mounted as far aft as reasonable in the center so the thrust is in line and no occupants are in the rotor burst zone?
__________________
Steve Melton
Cincinnati, OH
RV-9A, Tip-up, Superior O-320, roller lifters, 160HP, WW 200RV, dual impulse slick mags, oil pressure = 65 psi, EGT = 1300F, flight hours = 800+ for all

Simplicity is the art in design.
My Artwork is freely given and published and cannot be patented.
www.rvplasticparts.com
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-05-2014, 10:40 AM
Neal@F14's Avatar
Neal@F14 Neal@F14 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Wichita Falls, TX
Posts: 2,182
Default

It would be kinda neat to have a few extra pounds of thrust available for augmenting takeoff from short, backcountry airstrips with high density altitude. That would truly be "JATO".
__________________
Neal Howard
Airplaneless once again...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-05-2014, 12:39 PM
Lindamon Lindamon is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 51
Default A friend's new plane

http://www.aero-news.net/index.cfm?d...4-18754f671301

Good question on whether a type rating is necessary, I don't know if Jimmy Franklin had one or not. I will ask John next chance I get.
__________________
Damon Wack
RV-7
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-05-2014, 12:55 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Clark View Post
A type rating is required in a specific make and model of aircraft if the aircraft weighs more than 12,500 lb (5,700 kg) at takeoff or is powered by one or more turbojet engines.

Might make for an interesting discussion with the FAA.

John Clark ATP, CFI
FAAST Team Representative
EAA Flight Advisor
RV8 N18U "Sunshine"
KSBA
Is that true if it is a motor glider?

IIRC at least 4 of these 220 lb thrust Caproni A-21-SJ sailplanes were imported to the US.

http://www.sailplanedirectory.com/Pl...fm?planeID=413
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-05-2014, 04:18 PM
Bill_H's Avatar
Bill_H Bill_H is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Marshall TX (KASL)
Posts: 1,783
Default

Does the phrase "or is powered by one or more turbojet engines" mean "powered ONLY by one or more turbojet engines"? Because I don't remember reading the the Waco biplane with the normal radial PLUS the bottom-mounted jet needed a type rating. (Maybe multi-engine centerline thrust?)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-05-2014, 05:07 PM
Steve Melton's Avatar
Steve Melton Steve Melton is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 2,787
Default motor glider

perhaps this application could be classified as either motor glider for engine out condition or thrust augmentation on center line. the first application for safety the second for performance. hopefully, a turbine rating is not required.
__________________
Steve Melton
Cincinnati, OH
RV-9A, Tip-up, Superior O-320, roller lifters, 160HP, WW 200RV, dual impulse slick mags, oil pressure = 65 psi, EGT = 1300F, flight hours = 800+ for all

Simplicity is the art in design.
My Artwork is freely given and published and cannot be patented.
www.rvplasticparts.com

Last edited by Steve Melton : 01-05-2014 at 05:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:11 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.