|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

08-11-2013, 12:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Oak Ridge,Tn
Posts: 137
|
|
With out doubt, there are times when the BRS would be advantageous. But if its a concern for you, then it's lighter, cheaper, and smarter to just wear a parachute and weigh out the chances of a successful egress versus a successful deployment of the BRS, along with the negatives that come with dragging the BRS along with you wherever you go.
__________________
Greg Morgan, A&P
RV-8A, Phase 1 @ KDKX &
TN08
Oak Ridge,TN
|

08-11-2013, 12:30 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 659
|
|
Here's a quick hack at it. I'm not sure where I got the W&B spreadsheet, but the numbers are from my 9A (fixed pitch sensi, O-320).
I took a guess at the location of the BRS and went for 160" aft of datum. That's ~3ft aft of the baggage. Even with bingo fuel it's showing within limits.
If someone wants to try other numbers I'd be happy to punch them in and post.
__________________
Andy Compton, PhD EE
RV-10 - #41414 (building)
RV-9A - N643AC (built,flying,sold,missed)
My blood and sweat, the Wifey's tears
|

08-11-2013, 02:22 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NOLA
Posts: 10
|
|
Cost
Any idea on what the system will cost, as well as the yearly maintenance?
|

08-11-2013, 06:21 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,324
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by dekagram
Any idea on what the system will cost, as well as the yearly maintenance?
|
Here is a quote from Flying Magazine on the Cirrus system. I would imagine a somewhat smaller system, for a lighter aircraft, would be slightly less. Note that these costs do not include labor or the initial installation.
The bad thing about new technology is that it often comes at a cost. In this case, the parachute system needs to be replaced every 10 years. To its credit, Cirrus never made a secret of this fact. Moreover, the company always said that the replacement would be fairly costly and pegged that cost at around $10,000. Labor costs are extra, and will likely bring the overall replacement cost to more than $10,000 in most cases.
John Clark ATP, CFI
FAAST Team Representative
EAA Flight Advisor
RV8 N18U "Sunshine"
KSBA
|

08-18-2013, 02:49 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Issaquah, WA
Posts: 146
|
|
Just curious - what's the reasoning for making this parachute system exit out the side of the aircraft instead of just rotating it in the same spot and having it exit out the top?
__________________
Brandon
Issaquah, WA
|

08-18-2013, 07:25 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 408
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by skelrad
Just curious - what's the reasoning for making this parachute system exit out the side of the aircraft instead of just rotating it in the same spot and having it exit out the top?
|
Slider canopies have a canopy rail along the top of the fuse it can't go through.
__________________
JV
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
RV7 QB - Airframe largely complete, sans canopy and glass... unfortunately sold
RV6 - O-360-A1A, Hartzell CS, dual G3X VFR... purchased
Dues paid 2015
"Being defeated is only a temporary condition; giving up is what makes it permanent."
-- Marilyn vos Savant
|

08-05-2014, 07:21 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Calhoun, GA
Posts: 49
|
|
Salesman at Osh said $9,000 system. Repack every 6 yrs for about $1,000.
|

08-05-2014, 10:27 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 11
|
|
BRS for non pilot passenger
I think one big benefit would be for a non pilot passenger who was given a good brief on how to deploy the BRS in the event of pilot incapacitation. A lot of us aren't spring chickens anymore in the pilot community so the possibility of becoming incapacitated is becoming greater and greater as we age. A non pilot would think a BRS was awesome when airborne with effectively no pilot.
|

08-05-2014, 11:07 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,010
|
|
As proven with the Cirrus, availability of a parachute option will likely make a "little" airplane a viable for some people or couples. Even if they can't carry more than 20 lbs of bags, I would imagine some are eagerly awaiting an RV with a BRS simply for the real or perceived added safety option.
Doubt there's one in my near future, but I see absolutely nothing wrong with them becoming available for others.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:13 PM.
|