VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 07-17-2013, 01:29 PM
BonitaRV8 BonitaRV8 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Bonita, Ca
Posts: 56
Default P-Mag vs. Light Speed

I haven't ordered my engine yet but will be doing so in about six months and I'm looking for input/direction on using P-mag or Light Speed plasma II or III. Anybody have any good preferences/arguments for or against either of the two? Currently I'm leaning towards the ECI 370 engine.

Thanks!
__________________
Empannagee done
Wings 90% done
Received fuselage
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-17-2013, 01:46 PM
Beer30?'s Avatar
Beer30? Beer30? is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Longmont, CO
Posts: 215
Default PMag issues

I'm just building my engine and had planned on going with A single PMag. I had designed the electrical system around it and had all but ordered it. During the past six months though, I've seen a rash of PMag failures discussed here, and only saw 1 Lightspeed issue discussed in the archive. That convinced me to buy a Lightspeed. Just one guys opinion though, no flying experience behind either one.

David
__________________
David Dalton
Longmont, CO

RV-7 Complete,
Flies like a dream!

Lifetime VAF Member
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-17-2013, 02:24 PM
scard's Avatar
scard scard is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Cedar Park, TX
Posts: 3,156
Default

I've had both and am currently (for the last 1100hrs) flying behind Lightspeed.
__________________
Scott Card
CQ Headset by Card Machine Works
CMW E-Lift
RV-9A N4822C flying 2200+hrs. / Cedar Park, TX
RV8 Building - fuselage / showplanes canopy (Done!)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-17-2013, 02:42 PM
penguin penguin is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: England
Posts: 1,087
Default

I have been flying behind P-mags since 2005 and would not fit anything else. In that time there have been several versions - the latest (since 2007) is the Series 114, which seems to be much more reliable than previous versions.

To my mind the ease of installation, the low component count, the ability to be completely self contained (not relying on a battery once running) and the straight forward timing method are the significant issues. Brad & Tom are a pleasure to do business with, customer support is excellent.

Pete
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-17-2013, 05:05 PM
Danny King's Avatar
Danny King Danny King is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Southlake, Texas
Posts: 626
Default P-mag's for me

I started with Slick mags, then LASAR (slick mags modified for electronic ignition), and for the last three years, Dual P-mags. IMHO the best way to go!

1) self contained and independent from Aircraft electrical system after start.
2) All eight plugs high energy firing under computer timing with .035 spark gap.
3) Compact, light, one moving part, mounts on Mag pads.
4) Incredibly easy to time and sync
5) Low cost NGK auto spark plugs (under $3.00 each.... no more cleaning plugs)
__________________
Danny King
Beautiful Doll 80434 TT 1675 hours
I0360 A1B6 200 HP
Christen Inverted Oil
First Flight 12 July 2000
VAF Dues current for 2020
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-17-2013, 06:24 PM
videobobk's Avatar
videobobk videobobk is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Near Scipio, in Southern Indiana
Posts: 1,779
Default

I have flown P-Mags since '07 and have had great results. They really stand behind their products, and no failures except when I pressure washed one--my bad, but they fixed it anyway.

Besides good products, they support the future of aviation. Buy one between now and Aug 15th and Eagle's Nest gets $50 toward a project or flight training for HS kids. Does that make me biased? Naaaah...

Bob
__________________
Bob Kelly, Scipio, Indiana
Tech Counselor
Founder, Eagle's Nest Projects
President, AviationNation, Inc
RV-9A N908BL, Flying
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-17-2013, 06:52 PM
Walt's Avatar
Walt Walt is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dallas/Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 5,686
Default

I'm a lightspeed fan. Lots of solid history and the electronics are mounted in the cabin where the environment for electronics is more friendly (cooler) than bolted to the motor.

Granted it's more work to install, but I didn't build an airplane because it was easy
__________________
Walt Aronow, DFW, TX (52F)

EXP Aircraft Services LLC
Specializing in RV Condition Inspections, Maintenance, Avionics Upgrades
Dynamic Prop Balancing, Pitot-Static Altmeter/Transponder Certification
FAA Certified Repair Station, AP/IA/FCC GROL, EAA Technical Counselor
Authorized Garmin G3X Dealer/Installer
RV7A built 2004, 1700+ hrs, New Titan IO-370, Bendix Mags
Website: ExpAircraft.com, Email: walt@expaircraft.com, Cell: 972-746-5154
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-17-2013, 07:11 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beer30? View Post
...I had designed the electrical system around it and had all but ordered it. During the past six months though, I've seen a rash of PMag failures discussed here, and only saw 1 Lightspeed issue discussed in the archive. That convinced me to buy a Lightspeed. Just one guys opinion though, no flying experience behind either one.

David
The high component count is one reason I stayed away from the LS ignition. Regarding the failure count, it is probably still a lot better than a standard magneto. I also think, but don't know, that there are few and fewer LS ignitions being installed these days. Just a guess with no facts behind it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danny King View Post
I started with Slick mags, then LASAR (slick mags modified for electronic ignition), and for the last three years, Dual P-mags. IMHO the best way to go!

1) self contained and independent from Aircraft electrical system after start.
2) All eight plugs high energy firing under computer timing with .035 spark gap.
3) Compact, light, one moving part, mounts on Mag pads.
4) Incredibly easy to time and sync
5) Low cost NGK auto spark plugs (under $3.00 each.... no more cleaning plugs)
Well put Danny.

I am an early adopter of the P-mags and lived through some teething issues, which led us to develop the EICommander.

Needless to say, I'm a big fan!
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-17-2013, 07:34 PM
Gonzo24 Gonzo24 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NW Ohio
Posts: 128
Default Good real # comparison of EIs on EFII website

I have a dual LSE plasma II system on my -7 and had a single plasma II with slick on my 7a. I would be very tempted to go with EFII if doing it again though after seeing Robert Paisley's recent test results on his site. Looks like a very robust, high output system.
__________________
Built 7A flew 700+ hrs - sold
- 7 flying
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-17-2013, 07:44 PM
deek deek is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Flathead Lake Montana - 8S1
Posts: 334
Default

I have no experience with P-mags, but have installed a Plasma 1, and two Plasma 2's in 3 birds; Slicks on the lower plugs since Bendix mags won't fit on an EZ

Total time on the 3 systems is over 4,000 hours. I emphatically recommend you use either the std crank trigger or the new mini sensor (this might be the best) and avoid the accessory case Hall Effect Module.

I like the idea of all the electronics being in the cabin and not being exposed to powerplant heat and vibration. What I don't like about LSE is the sub-D connectors but they seem to work just fine - no problems with them. Support ith LSE is great PROVIDING you install the system per the manual and re-read the trouble shooting section before calling Klaus. My 14 will have one LSE and one Bendix magneto.

deek
__________________
'83 LongEZ - N888EZ 3,671 hours
'89 LimoEZ - N26EZ 686 hours (sold)
A couple of Glasairs and a Lancair 320...
Next: a RV14 need something to build
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.