VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-12/RV-12iS
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 06-23-2013, 09:29 AM
the_other_dougreeves the_other_dougreeves is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas, TX (ADS)
Posts: 2,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony_T View Post
Just thinking, but the difference in price between 6 gallons of 100LL and Mogas is only about 12 bucks, not even enough to pay for a lunch for two people.
There are reduced maintenance intervals and increased costs running the 912 on 100LL. IIRC, Oil changes are now 25 hr and plugs at 50, and gearbox overhauls are more frequent and costly due to the lead build up. So its at least a couple $/hr cheaper running on mogas.

TODR
__________________
Doug "The Other Doug Reeves" Reeves
CTSW N621CT - SOLD but not forgotten
Home Bases LBX, BZN
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-23-2013, 10:28 AM
Tony_T's Avatar
Tony_T Tony_T is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 1,361
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by the_other_dougreeves View Post
There are reduced maintenance intervals and increased costs running the 912 on 100LL. IIRC, Oil changes are now 25 hr and plugs at 50, and gearbox overhauls are more frequent and costly due to the lead build up. So its at least a couple $/hr cheaper running on mogas.

TODR
We are only talking about an occasional use of 100LL, and even then it would be a mix with Mogas. There would be no addition maintenance issues, in fact one Rotax mechanic we know claims the cleanest engines he has seen were run on a mix of Mogas and Avgas. I am skeptical of that but he has 30 years of experience.

Tony
__________________
Tony
E-LSA RV-12 ULS
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-23-2013, 06:34 PM
pietermk pietermk is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 132
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DonFromTX View Post
That would mean landing in some field with no fuel left, an action that would empty my bladder even before touchdown!
Haha Don you are right
__________________
Peter
See my builders log, I received the tail kit on February 2011, still working on it. I need more free time Dues paid for 2017
http://www.mykitlog.com/PeterRV12/
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-23-2013, 07:39 PM
David Paule David Paule is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,428
Default

Compare the real empty weights and the real cruise speeds. The RV-12 has very,very nice handling and superb visibility.

I bet that with a careful look at these things, it'll be an easy decision.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-25-2013, 06:07 AM
GhostRider32 GhostRider32 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Paris, Tx
Posts: 93
Default

I went for a ride in Steve's -12 last night, what a great plane. It was really smooth and the controls were really light and Steve did a great job building his plane. I haven't been in a 650 yet but the -12 is going to be really hard to beat. Even at a heavy load, the 912 was ably to lift us off a grass runway and climb just fine. I'm about 6 months from starting my plane but after riding in Steve's -12, I wanted to go home and order the kit then......
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:17 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.