|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

06-06-2013, 07:37 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chesterfield, Missouri
Posts: 4,514
|
|
Ron,
Not to minimize or condone flight through R-2916 or to not appreciate your frustration, this post does not belong on this forum - 99.9% of RV pilots do not have occasion to fly in your area of operation near Key West. And if they did, most would not penetrate the area so the number is more like 99.999%. The message is like getting a lecture on drinking untreated water in Africa - it doesn't apply here.
Beyond that, the designation of airspace for what you are doing should be PROHIBITED. Would that be possible (?) - probably not considering the bureaucratic government jungle controlling such matters. The activity does not meet that defined within a PROHIBITED area or some such excuse.
No question, unauthorized flight activity within a RESTRICTED area can be very hazardous but such activity is not wholly prohibited, read AIM on the subject. How that wording got in the book is probably the result of a compromise concerning locking up more airspace in this country.
That is an issue I am concerned about. If the government had a totally free hand in the matter, we would be lucky to have any airspace to fly in. The restrictions imposed since 9-11 are very apparent with moving TFR's popping up everywhere for all kinds of reasons, usually political. Every gathering of people can be and is so designated.
Also, there are designated areas that seldom get used. That last time I called ATC about flying through a MOA, the controller responded the area has not been used for months.
Getting back to RESTRICTED areas, be smart, stay out of them. Flying is hazardous enough without throwing that element into the brew.
__________________
RV-12 Build Helper
RV-7A...Sold #70374
The RV-8...Sold #83261
I'm in, dues paid 2019 This place is worth it!
|

06-06-2013, 07:39 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Locust, NC
Posts: 440
|
|
Pierre, I agree. Sometimes the FAA does try to protect us from something difficult to see with a restricted area. There is a 1400' tower 2 miles north of my airport (8A6). The nearly invisible wire supports are there waiting to remove a wing from the negligent. Hopefully there will be no restricted area 
__________________
Dave
M20C
|

06-06-2013, 08:24 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Yuma, Az
Posts: 87
|
|
Agreed
Quote:
Originally Posted by David-aviator
Ron,
Not to minimize or condone flight through R-2916 or to not appreciate your frustration, this post does not belong on this forum - 99.9% of RV pilots do not have occasion to fly in your area of operation near Key West. And if they did, most would not penetrate the area so the number is more like 99.999%. The message is like getting a lecture on drinking untreated water in Africa - it doesn't apply here.
Beyond that, the designation of airspace for what you are doing should be PROHIBITED. Would that be possible (?) - probably not considering the bureaucratic government jungle controlling such matters. The activity does not meet that defined within a PROHIBITED area or some such excuse.
No question, unauthorized flight activity within a RESTRICTED area can be very hazardous but such activity is not wholly prohibited, read AIM on the subject. How that wording got in the book is probably the result of a compromise concerning locking up more airspace in this country.
That is an issue I am concerned about. If the government had a totally free hand in the matter, we would be lucky to have any airspace to fly in. The restrictions imposed since 9-11 are very apparent with moving TFR's popping up everywhere for all kinds of reasons, usually political. Every gathering of people can be and is so designated.
Also, there are designated areas that seldom get used. That last time I called ATC about flying through a MOA, the controller responded the area has not been used for months.
Getting back to RESTRICTED areas, be smart, stay out of them. Flying is hazardous enough without throwing that element into the brew.
|
David,
I agree with you as to this should be on a different forum. I have toyed with the idea of getting in contact with Paul Dye and seeing if this is maybe something that Kitplanes could get out there...even though AOPA would probably be even better. As to prohibited, the simple fact is, we DO allow some flight through the area (99.9% of the time it is Coast Guard doing SAR missions). However to do that there is a strict protocol that is used, including gettting permission prior to entering from Eastern Air Defense and verification that we are down and moored. I don't know what the answer is...I just know that, like Pierre indicated, it really is simple to avoid us and stay alive.
__________________
Ron Hasenbeck
Yuma, Az
RV-14 Wannabe
=VAF= Dues Paid October 2018
EAA 1109496
|

06-06-2013, 08:46 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 82
|
|
I, for one, think that all the ranting and back and forth about this is a good thing. Just look at how many views this thread has had so far - 5,000+. You?ve already done a good job of raising everyone?s awareness.
Keep up the rants ? it keeps the thread at the top of the list so more people see it. Next time I fly anywhere near Key West I?ll be sure to triple check the charts!!
Now back to your regularly scheduled rants?
__________________
RV-8 empennage DONE
Wings 99% done
Fuselage in progress
|

06-06-2013, 09:28 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Novato, CA KDVO
Posts: 377
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NavyS3BNFO
I, for one, think that all the ranting and back and forth about this is a good thing. Just look at how many views this thread has had so far - 5,000+. You?ve already done a good job of raising everyone?s awareness.
Keep up the rants ? it keeps the thread at the top of the list so more people see it. Next time I fly anywhere near Key West I?ll be sure to triple check the charts!!
Now back to your regularly scheduled rants?
|
That is exactly what I was thinking. I will not forget this now and I do plan to fly in that area eventually. Make that 5000 +/- + 1.
__________________
Kyle Gee
Purchased and sold flying RV-6
RV-7 Kit (sold to purchase C150 to train my kids)
Purchased flying RV-7
|

06-06-2013, 09:31 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
|
|
Since the AIM just got mentioned, I went and looked upo the section on Restricted areas....
3-4-3. Restricted Areas
a. Restricted areas contain airspace identified by an area on the surface of the earth within which the flight of aircraft, while not wholly prohibited, is subject to restrictions. Activities within these areas must be confined because of their nature or limitations imposed upon aircraft operations that are not a part of those activities or both. Restricted areas denote the existence of unusual, often invisible, hazards to aircraft such as artillery firing, aerial gunnery, or guided missiles. Penetration of restricted areas without authorization from the using or controlling agency may be extremely hazardous to the aircraft and its occupants. Restricted areas are published in the Federal Register and constitute 14 CFR Part 73.
Seems pretty clear to me, and even a label change to Prohibited wouldn't make any difference.
Stay out unless you have specific permission...
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
|

06-06-2013, 01:57 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: SoCal
Posts: 391
|
|
What I've learned
In order of entertainment value:
"It's not about the nail in the head!"
>5500 hits (and counting.)
Yes, I will remember to stay South of US1 when passing Cudjoe Key
__________________
______
VAF dues paid though exempt
RV-9A sold (I miss that bird!)
RV10 sold (miss that one too!)
RV-14A build underway
|

06-06-2013, 03:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Yuma, Az
Posts: 87
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by esco
Yes, I will remember to stay South of US1 when passing Cudjoe Key
|
Thank You!   
__________________
Ron Hasenbeck
Yuma, Az
RV-14 Wannabe
=VAF= Dues Paid October 2018
EAA 1109496
|

06-06-2013, 03:47 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Independence, OR
Posts: 316
|
|
I think this information is appropriate for this forum although I probably won't be flying in south FL any time soon.
Also, aren't these things in other states, such as AZ, NM and TX?
__________________
John Horn (donated for 2020)
Independence, OR
LSRM-A, CFII
Rotax Service, Maintenance, and Heavy Maintenance Trained
Building an RV-12, N7878H reserved
Flying a Flight Design CTSW
|

06-06-2013, 03:53 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Yuma, Az
Posts: 87
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sandpiper
I think this information is appropriate for this forum although I probably won't be flying in south FL any time soon.
Also, aren't these things in other states, such as AZ, NM and TX?
|
And, Puerto Rico (although they don't have an aerostat at the moment). A list of all the TARS sites is on the web, so I'm not telling any secrets here:
Yuma, Az
Deming, NM
Marfa, Tx
Rio Grande City, Tx
Eagle Pass, Tx
Ft. Huachuca, Az
Cudjoe Key, FL
Lajas, Puerto Rico
Rules are the same around each.
__________________
Ron Hasenbeck
Yuma, Az
RV-14 Wannabe
=VAF= Dues Paid October 2018
EAA 1109496
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:54 PM.
|