VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 05-30-2013, 06:26 AM
LAMPSguy's Avatar
LAMPSguy LAMPSguy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Pensacola, FL
Posts: 374
Default Death of Pitot system

Many systems we have used for years and assumed were "indispensable" are slowly being replaced. Their demise is often characterized by cantankerous pilots as the decline of aviation, the beginning of the end, or even as unsafe (sometimes this is true). We have seen vacuum systems be completely replaced by robust electrical systems, VOR's replaced by GPS, etc.

Many of us think pitot systems are irreplaceable because, well, we "need" airspeed, right? Well I was thinking last night about this. I fly some great machines bought and paid for, as well as maintained by, all of you wonderful taxpayers (thank you). This is to say that if I have ANY gripe, I just write it up and it gets fixed. Well, even with this level of maintenance, we often have a few knots of slop between sides and between reality in the pitot systems (2 independent systems for each side, with the ability to switch between sources, all glass panel). One system we always thought was "required" was a doppler radar for use while hovering at low altitudes over water (If you think this is not necessary, try hovering a helicopter at 70ft, at night with no visible horizon, over the same spot without getting vertigo or drifting due to the rotor wash in the ocean!). We now just use GPS position coupled with INS...NO doppler!

I see a possibility in the not too distant future where we have accurate and reliable ADS-B info (ground winds for every station as well as regional/altitude enroute data). If this data can be made accurate enough (might already be), vector summed with your GPS ground vector, voila, "airspeed". Sure, the numbers would not be perfect, but I am thinking back to every time I have compared my IAS(pitot) with my computer generated AS (GS summed with winds) and it is almost always within a few knots...the slop I already have in my pitot system. So, if this would be reliable enough, you could get rid of the pitot tubes, static ports, alt air source, included tubing, electronic sending unit, POWER for heated pitot, aerodynamically cleaner aircraft...

Thoughts?
__________________
RV-? in planning stages.
RV-14 #140050 SOLD

Permanently willing to contribute fuel for RV rides

Helicopter ATP/CFI(I)
ASEL/AMEL Commercial/Inst/CFI(I)
Aerobatic Instruction available

Atlanta based.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-30-2013, 07:41 AM
airguy's Avatar
airguy airguy is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Garden City, Tx
Posts: 5,147
Default

That might work - right up until you throw Mother Nature in the mix with convective activity. The time lag between the ground-based projection of the wind shear on short final and your physical interception of it (not to mention dynamic weather in cruise) will produce lots of wrinkled metal and happy lawyers.

I predict the reports of the pitot tubes death may be greatly exaggerated (apologies to Mark Twain).
__________________
Greg Niehues - SEL, IFR, Repairman Cert.
Garden City, TX VAF 2020 dues paid
N16GN flying 700 hrs and counting; IO360, SDS, WWRV200, Dynon HDX, 430W
Built an off-plan RV9A with too much fuel and too much HP. Should drop dead any minute now.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-30-2013, 08:49 AM
Don's Avatar
Don Don is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 696
Default

Interesting thoughts and logic about the impending death of the pitot. Personally, I would be surprised if we still measure airspeed almost exclusively with a pitot in 50 years but I think the demise is not going to happen in the immediate future.

My knee jerk reaction is a GPS derived airspeed that incorporates winds aloft is practical today. I think most EFISs could be programmed to do that now. The pitot system is fairly simple, robust and independent of microprocessor failure, government degraded GPS signals (which happens near me too often) and inaccurate or delayed winds aloft speeds. It seems to me there's wisdom in adding the derived airspeed value but a risk in removing the pitot system. The risk probably isn't immediate or constant, which makes it insidious. Perhaps 5%, 10% or maybe even more, your airspeed could be off by 20% or more. It seems to me that's cutting it close on an approach speed, and could be hazardous with Vne and Va speeds.

Having said this, I expect the improved reliability of the current systems noted above, the expanded use of AOA indicators, and perhaps the development of an onboard electronic (read reliable and leakproof) way of directly reading airspeed will eventually lead to the demise of the pitot. I'd be looking 20-25 years out for experimental aircraft and probably July 1, 2150 at the earliest for certificated aircraft. By that time heated pitot tubes should be selling for about the same cost as a wing kit today.
__________________
Don Alexander
Virginia
RV-9A 257SW Purchase Flying - O-320, Dynon D100
RV-9A 702DA (reserved) Finish Kit IOX-340
www.propjock.com
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-30-2013, 09:06 AM
flyeyes's Avatar
flyeyes flyeyes is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 804
Default

I think real-time, local measurement of the air pressure acting on the aircraft will always be useful. Direct measurement of ram air pressure is important for staying within airframe limitations and preventing stalls, etc. i agree that using IAS for navigation calculations is anachronistic, though. apart from Vne/Vno we're really most concerned about groundspeed (which gps does better) and AOA. "approach speeds" are just a proxy for AOA that varies with loading, density altitude, etc. Locally measured AOA is still always gonna be useful.

What's really anachronistic though is using pressure gauges which have to be constantly recalibrated (on an hourly basis or more) as the primary means to determine altitude. This is especially true in the flight levels, where the absolute pressure differences between altitudes are tiny. It can cost upwards of $100K to retrofit a legacy turbine aircraft with better altimeters (super accurate pressure gauges) to qualify for RVSM. WAAS GPS can locate an aicraft within a handful of meters even vertically. we ought to all be flying GPS altitudes, and occasionally adjusting our altimeters to match the gps so we have a backup in case of gps failure. Flying pressure altitudes around traffic should be an emergency backup procedure.
__________________
James Freeman
RV-8 flying
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-30-2013, 09:16 AM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is online now
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,420
Default Backup system still nice to have

I can see the possibility of a GPS system eventually displacing the Pitot/Static for primary references, but I do not see the P/S going away, it is pretty standard practice to have a backup system that is not driven by the same source as a primary------in this case electrical vs just plain old air.
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-30-2013, 10:31 AM
David Paule David Paule is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,435
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LAMPSguy View Post
....We have seen vacuum systems be completely replaced by robust electrical systems, VOR's replaced by GPS, etc.....
One thing I never understood was why didn't VOR receivers ever get married to the nav computers that started becoming popular back with the early Loran sets?


Quote:
Originally Posted by LAMPSguy View Post
....I am thinking back to every time I have compared my IAS(pitot) with my computer generated AS (GS summed with winds) and it is almost always within a few knots...the slop I already have in my pitot system. So, if this would be reliable enough, you could get rid of the pitot tubes, static ports, alt air source, included tubing, electronic sending unit, POWER for heated pitot, aerodynamically cleaner aircraft....
So where would the wind data come from?

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-30-2013, 10:46 AM
larrynew's Avatar
larrynew larrynew is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: In New Braunfels, ist das Leben schön!
Posts: 871
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flyeyes View Post
I think real-time, local measurement of the air pressure acting on the aircraft will always be useful.
I thought by now, someone really smart would have come up with a way to measure air molecule passage or pressure with something like a strain gauge to replace the pitot static system. Some magic electrogadget that measures how many air molecules pass to calculate airspeed or a change in pressure for AOA.

__________________
Larry New
RV-7A - Built, flying 900+ hrs
RV-10 - Built, flying 2.9 hrs
??? - RV-12, Subsonex
48 States in 7 Days!
VAF Paid - Annual Autodraft

Last edited by larrynew : 05-30-2013 at 10:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-30-2013, 10:57 AM
John Clark's Avatar
John Clark John Clark is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 1,324
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Paule View Post
One thing I never understood was why didn't VOR receivers ever get married to the nav computers that started becoming popular back with the early Loran sets?
Actually, they did. FMS systems used VOR, GPS, LORAN, and even NDB inputs. Operationally most of this was in the background, the system utilizing the best information. I used to fly a Collins system that not only automatically used VORs, it would identify the station and display the ID.

As much as I like the modern systems, being an "old guy," I still like to have a simple backup. Pitot static, like a whiskey compass, is simple backup, not dependent on other aircraft systems.

John Clark ATP, CFI
FAAST Team Representative
EAA Flight Advisor
RV8 N18U "Sunshine"
KSBA
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-30-2013, 11:22 AM
BobTurner BobTurner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,797
Default

A few thoughts.
Several posters are confusing IAS and TAS. But knowing one this proposed box could calculate the other.
Winds aloft are currently forecast, not measured. I see this as the biggest problem. Run into some strong turbulence and want to slow to Va (which is an IAS)? This scheme requires good knowledge of the wind.
Using GPS (true) altitude makes a lot of sense to me. But true altitude is not the same as barometrically determined altitude (indicated altitude) so everyone, even casual vfr fliers, would need to convert. Interesting that precision gps approaches (LPV) still use a barometric altimeter to determine DA, not the gps altitude.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-30-2013, 12:29 PM
airguy's Avatar
airguy airguy is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Garden City, Tx
Posts: 5,147
Default

I can see an AOA system taking the place of pitot/static for low altitude and pattern uses, and a GPS for enroute guesstimates, perhaps. An AOA system would serve all the major purposes of the pitot-static in the case of sudden wind shifts and stall awareness - but then the question becomes how do you get AOA without pitot/static? Pressure differential across several ports on the leading edge? That can quickly become more technologically difficult and expensive than a simple pitot tube.
__________________
Greg Niehues - SEL, IFR, Repairman Cert.
Garden City, TX VAF 2020 dues paid
N16GN flying 700 hrs and counting; IO360, SDS, WWRV200, Dynon HDX, 430W
Built an off-plan RV9A with too much fuel and too much HP. Should drop dead any minute now.

Last edited by airguy : 05-30-2013 at 12:33 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:20 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.