VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-9/9A
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-27-2013, 11:23 AM
PJ79 PJ79 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Withcott, QLD, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 9
Default

Hi Everyone,
Thanks for your replies. Yes I have looked at the Tip tanks and they may be the option I go for if it turns out much easier. I certainly would love to try the RV 14 but am concerned that the costs will end up blowing out due to the cost of the 390. From what I have read it can more than 10k more.
Does this sound right?
I have seen on a builders log (Bretts RV 9a) that you can buy kit engines to save on costs. I have a good friend who is an extremely talented fitter who may be interested in assembling the engine for me if i go that way. Has anyone else had experience with kit engines?
Once again, thankyou for all your replies and your warm welcome.
Look for to corresponding alot more as I get into the details and my kit arrives!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-27-2013, 12:17 PM
Av8torTom's Avatar
Av8torTom Av8torTom is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Yardley, PA
Posts: 1,334
Default Hummmmm

37 gallons at a conservative burn of 10 gallons/hour = 3 hrs in the air with reserves. About as long as I want to spend in the air before I want to stretch my legs... but that's just me.
__________________
RV-9A (empennage completed, both wings completed, fuselage and finish kit completed, engine hung, working on panel and wiring)
N677AT reserved
Superior XP O-320, 160HP
Picture log: http://s271.photobucket.com/albums/j...8tor215/RV-9A/
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-27-2013, 12:25 PM
airguy's Avatar
airguy airguy is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Garden City, Tx
Posts: 5,145
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Av8torTom View Post
37 gallons at a conservative burn of 10 gallons/hour = 3 hrs in the air with reserves. About as long as I want to spend in the air before I want to stretch my legs... but that's just me.
In general, for passenger comfort, you would be correct. However, some of us may want to make long over-water flights where the fuel would be needed. I know that was my reason for building the extended tanks in my 9A.
__________________
Greg Niehues - SEL, IFR, Repairman Cert.
Garden City, TX VAF 2020 dues paid
N16GN flying 700 hrs and counting; IO360, SDS, WWRV200, Dynon HDX, 430W
Built an off-plan RV9A with too much fuel and too much HP. Should drop dead any minute now.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-27-2013, 12:27 PM
alpinelakespilot2000 alpinelakespilot2000 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,646
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Av8torTom View Post
37 gallons at a conservative burn of 10 gallons/hour = 3 hrs in the air with reserves. About as long as I want to spend in the air before I want to stretch my legs... but that's just me.
And that's if you're willing to burn 10gph. If you look through the threads you'll see that many -9 pilots tend to pull the power back for cross country cruise. 60-65% power can be done at about 6-7 gph and still yield 140-150 kts TAS. That means standard tanks really give you about 5-6 hours of economy cruise.

Thus, I'm in the camp that extra tanks are really not necessary for me but, if they were, I would definitely go the route of adding after-market tanks rather than structurally changing the wings, especially given all the complexity, time, expense, and engineering questions that go along with doing that.
__________________
Steve M.
Ellensburg WA
RV-9 Flying, 0-320, Catto

Donation reminder: Jan. 2021
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-27-2013, 12:31 PM
PaulR PaulR is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Geneva, AL
Posts: 491
Default Endurance

I'm a little like Av8tor. I'm 57 and the fuel tanks in my 9A are a LOT bigger than my bladder!!!! Plus, as comfy as Abby's seats are, I still want to stretch my legs at least by the 3 hour mark!!!!
__________________
Paul Rose
RV-9A 91300
N417PR
SERFI 2013 Awards
Inspection Complete!!! 7/7/12
First Flight 7/22/12
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-27-2013, 12:53 PM
PJ79 PJ79 is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Withcott, QLD, AUSTRALIA
Posts: 9
Default

Hi all,
Thanks for all your replies. Im not trying to question anyones bladder. Just wanted the option of not having to fill up everytime I land as quality fuel might be an issue in some areas here. I was hoping to get specific details of how people have increased fuel capacity. Im leaning toward tip tanks at the moment but will make that decision when my plans arrive and I assess the wing design. I just thought anyone who had increased the number of bays used in the tanks might be able to give me details.
Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-27-2013, 01:15 PM
pierre smith's Avatar
pierre smith pierre smith is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, Ga
Posts: 7,840
Default

PJ, the variations of extra tankage are plenty, from 50% more fuel to full length leading edges.

A lot of the guys who build Super -8's (IO-540's) and Super -7's, buy a single tank skin from Van's, cut it in half and add one section to each outboard end, adding 50% more, or thereabouts, because of the higher fuel consumption of the big engines.

Read about Jon Johannson on Van's front page. He's in Oz and had 18 hours aboard his -4 for his two round-the-world flights, including 50 gallons in the back seat!

Best,
__________________
Pierre Smith
RV-10, 510 TT
RV6A (Sojourner) 180 HP, Catto 3 Bl (502Hrs), gone...and already missed
Air Tractor AT 502B PT 6-15 Sold
Air Tractor 402 PT-6-20 Sold
EAA Flight Advisor/CFI/Tech Counselor
Louisville, Ga

It's never skill or craftsmanship that completes airplanes, it's the will to do so,
Patrick Kenny, EAA 275132


Dues gladly paid!
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-27-2013, 01:48 PM
Bevan Bevan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 1,674
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulR View Post
I'm a little like Av8tor. I'm 57 and the fuel tanks in my 9A are a LOT bigger than my bladder!!!! Plus, as comfy as Abby's seats are, I still want to stretch my legs at least by the 3 hour mark!!!!
3 hours outbound and 3 hours back equals 6 hours plus reserves. I like to go places that doesn't have fuel (and people).

Bevan
__________________
RV7A Flying since 2015
O-360-A1F6 (parallel valve) 180HP
Dual P-mags
Precision F.I. with AP purge valve
Vinyl Wrapped Exterior
Grand Rapids EFIS
Located in western Canada
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-27-2013, 11:09 PM
MauiLvrs's Avatar
MauiLvrs MauiLvrs is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: KTCY
Posts: 643
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Av8torTom View Post
37 gallons at a conservative burn of 10 gallons/hour = 3 hrs in the air with reserves.
At an economy cruise near 6gal/hr is 6 hours...
The best way to get a bit more gas if you are building the tanks is to extend the tanks out to the next rib...
__________________
Dave & Trina
RV-9A Flying - 330 Hrs. Painted Finishing the interior.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.