VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-13-2012, 12:48 AM
Snowflake's Avatar
Snowflake Snowflake is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,926
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PerfTech View Post
...We were well aware of this accident and as stated before, this tail didn't fall off. It was sheered in half from surface flutter caused by balance issues and over speed. This plane was seeing speeds well over 280 MPH and recorded dives in excess 12,000 FPM. This is far and away beyond the design limits of this airplane and the outcome is predictable and pretty much what Vans cautions can happen. This failure is in no way even related to the subject of the V/S mounting bracket or the modification we are offering. Thanks , Allan...l
While I don't disagree with your conclusions regarding the accident, to say that "the tail didn't fall off" and the failure is "no way related" is quite a stretch.

The photos of the wreckage (not included in the initial TSB report but are included in the other reports that are available if you ask the TSB for them) show that the stock forward bracket held very securely despite the punishing forces that it was subjected to during the course of the accident. In fact, the forward spar failed before any of the stock mounting bracket did.

That leads me to conclude that the stock mounting arrangement *is* strong enough, when properly installed. As an aside, looking at the photos of the mounting bracket in the C-GNDY accident, there's some hinky rivet pattern going on there, that doesn't use all of the rivet holes... No idea why. Still, the part didn't fail.

Here is the relevant page from the more in-depth document:
http://www.b4.ca/temp/output.pdf

As your modification merely strengthens this existing bracket, doesn't it just reinforce the stress concentration that already exists at the end of the bracket?
__________________
Rob Prior
1996 RV-6 "Tweety" C-FRBP (formerly N196RV)
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-13-2012, 09:35 AM
PerfTech's Avatar
PerfTech PerfTech is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Redlands, Ca.
Posts: 1,457
Default

...This thread seems to be wondering off from our original intention. We saw a problem with this original bracket and in our estimation have solved this problem. If it is your opinion that the original is adequate for your purposes then do not change it. Many people appear to feel as we do and have elected to do this simple modification. We are currently setting up our laser to do a second run of these parts, as the first fifty of the nines were sold in twenty four hours. We currently have orders for even more of the seven and eight modification brackets that will be available soon. I made a mistake commenting on the incident in Canada and it is irreverent to what we are trying to do with this mod. That failure obviously was not caused or effected by this bracket so it is of no issue here. Thanks, Allan..
__________________
Allan Nimmo
AntiSplatAero.com
Innovative Aircraft Safety
Products, Tools & Services
Info@AntiSplatAero.com
Southern California (KREI)
RV-9A / Edge-540
(909) 824-1020
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-13-2012, 01:23 PM
pmccoy's Avatar
pmccoy pmccoy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Orange County CA
Posts: 646
Default

Alan-

Interesting product. I had not seen any of the post regarding the possible cracks forming on this bracket.

Can you or some one else post a link to one of the older post please. I would like to see what the guys are saying who have seen this issues. Thanks.
__________________
_____________
Peter McCoy
RV9A N35PM S/N:91335
First Flight: April 2013
Hobbs: 400 hours after Oshkosh 2017
www.myrv9.com
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-13-2012, 01:43 PM
Red Five Red Five is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 12
Default Link

Quote:
Originally Posted by pmccoy View Post
Alan-

Interesting product. I had not seen any of the post regarding the possible cracks forming on this bracket.

Can you or some one else post a link to one of the older post please. I would like to see what the guys are saying who have seen this issues. Thanks.
Try this one...
http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...ad.php?t=89848
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-13-2012, 01:46 PM
FlyingArcher's Avatar
FlyingArcher FlyingArcher is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Andernos les Bains, France
Posts: 244
Default Or this one

http://www.vansairforce.com/communit...ad.php?t=87124
__________________
Daniel Mouly
VAF #778 - [2013 payment done]
RV-9A Emp. & Wings 95%, Fuse 70%
Austin Healey 3000 MKIII fully restored
LFCD (Andernos Les Bains), France
Construction Log comments in French (not really up to date, sorry)
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-14-2012, 11:12 AM
PerfTech's Avatar
PerfTech PerfTech is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Redlands, Ca.
Posts: 1,457
Default New Tooling Finished

Quote:
Originally Posted by MS19087 View Post
You will note that the VANs instructions to install this bracket allows the builder to place the bracket in the back OR the front of the spar depending what fits best. Mine in fact is in the back where I believe it is not subjected to the point pressure that those mounted on the front experience. That said, will this new brace work irrespective of how your bracket is currently installed FRONT or BACK??
.
....We want to let you guys know that we have finished the form die and tooling to make the mod for the assemblies that are mounted on the opposite side of the vertical spar. We have had several requests for this one and it seems about 15 % are on the back side. Please be sure to specify when ordering if you require this change (front or rear).
....We would like to say thank you for the fabulous response on this new product. We really appreciate this and all the kind words as well. Regards all, Allan...
__________________
Allan Nimmo
AntiSplatAero.com
Innovative Aircraft Safety
Products, Tools & Services
Info@AntiSplatAero.com
Southern California (KREI)
RV-9A / Edge-540
(909) 824-1020
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-14-2012, 11:57 AM
snoop9erdog snoop9erdog is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 259
Default Disimilar metals

Allan,

What is your recomendation to coat the new bracket with to avoid any dissimilar metal issues between the AL and SS? Is there a specific reason you went with 301 SS rather than a Chromoly application? Just curious. Thx.
__________________
Ed Avila
St. Johns, AZ (SJN)
N646A RV9
Worlds longest RV build...but getting there
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-14-2012, 10:50 PM
PerfTech's Avatar
PerfTech PerfTech is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Redlands, Ca.
Posts: 1,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snoop9erdog View Post
Allan,

What is your recomendation to coat the new bracket with to avoid any dissimilar metal issues between the AL and SS? Is there a specific reason you went with 301 SS rather than a Chromoly application? Just curious. Thx.
...This material is a very desirable grade for this type of part. It is very corrosion resistant, very strong, very tough and requires no heat treating to achieve the strength (unlike 4130). If you are concerned about the dissimilar metals, for a little added protection you can apply a thin film of dielectric grease between the two surfaces. I have included below a basic spec. sheet that outlines the general information on this material. It is very widely used in aviation for high stress parts. Thanks for the question. Allan...
.
.
__________________
Allan Nimmo
AntiSplatAero.com
Innovative Aircraft Safety
Products, Tools & Services
Info@AntiSplatAero.com
Southern California (KREI)
RV-9A / Edge-540
(909) 824-1020
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-15-2012, 06:00 AM
170 driver 170 driver is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Walterboro SC
Posts: 153
Default

The OEM I worked for used this material in structural repairs quite often, the engineering requirements for protective coatings were one coat of epoxy primer and 2 coats of solvent resistant white epoxy paint after drilling and fitting. As far as I know, there were never any corrosion problems with it with this treatment. I'm not sure what treatment I will give the parts I ordered from Allen, but they will be coated. Hopefully I can find some of this primer and paint in small enough quantities to make this happen.
__________________
Jim Poe
RV9 First Flight 2/23/09
s/n 91416
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11-28-2012, 10:35 PM
PerfTech's Avatar
PerfTech PerfTech is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Redlands, Ca.
Posts: 1,457
Talking NOW IN STOCK!!!!!!!!!!

....We now have the V/S mods finished for the RV9s with the mounting brackets attached to the rear of the vertical spar as well as the standard front mounting. Please be sure when ordering to specify the one you need. We will be offering this bracket in both configurations for the 9, 8, & 7s perhaps the 6s if the demand in there Thanks, Allan...
__________________
Allan Nimmo
AntiSplatAero.com
Innovative Aircraft Safety
Products, Tools & Services
Info@AntiSplatAero.com
Southern California (KREI)
RV-9A / Edge-540
(909) 824-1020
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:01 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.