VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-9/9A
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-16-2012, 06:11 AM
dbaflyer dbaflyer is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Iowa USA
Posts: 163
Default

Totally worth it to me. I just purchased one and it arrived August 9th. I'm not an old man but not a spring chick either. Some issues with my shoulders have caused me to slow down a lot because I needed a second person to help in cases where riveting caused a reaching stretch. I would not worry about figuring out where the quick build is done and what you have to do. Just read through the manual at page 1 of the fuselage build and walk through it. It doesn't take that much time to start identifying parts and seeing what is or is not done. So for you instead of spending 12 hours on the weekends, spend 6 and the rest with your new to be family member. YMMV.
__________________
Denis Sailer - Eastern Iowa
RV9A builder - Phase 2 (42 hours)
RV-9
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-16-2012, 07:37 AM
terrykohler terrykohler is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,009
Default Estimated Labor Value at About $8.00 Per Hour

I finished my standard build in 22 months in early '04. Based on cost difference between standard and quick build then, my "contribution" was worth about $8/hr. On the other hand, back then I had more time than cash. I pretty much had my fill of riveting after the first 5,000. Today, I'd do a full quick build. Keep in mind that at today's prices in the used marketplace, your labor value is near nill.
Terry, CFI
RV9A N323TP
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-16-2012, 08:40 AM
Dbro172's Avatar
Dbro172 Dbro172 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: West Fargo, ND
Posts: 1,073
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pierre smith View Post
Do you enjoy building or would you really rather be flying sooner? That was the question we asked and so the QB became a reality...built and flown in under two years.

As has been mentioned, the workmanship is incredibly good as well.

Best,

I do really enjoy building, but would rather be flying. As others have said i dont think i'll feel cheated on build time but i may regret not intimately knowing each rivet in the fuse. I can get over that.

Rick: Thanks for the tip on the finishing kit... not what my wallet wanted to here, but good to know none the less.

Also, i do not have a build partner, and I do have short arms That is something i hadnt considered.

Good to hear the comments about the quality workmanship in the QB's too.

Thanks everyone so far for your perspectives.
__________________
Derek Hoeschen
EAA Tech Counselor
RV-9A #92103 - N803DK
G3X, Superior XO-320, Dual Pmags, Catto 3B
www.mykitlog.com/dbro172/

1974 Bellanca Super Viking - N16AW - Flying
RV-8 #83565 - N184DK - building
1968 Mooney M20C - N6801N - Sold
1956 C-182 - N744W - Sold
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-16-2012, 09:53 AM
agirard7a's Avatar
agirard7a agirard7a is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Newport, RI
Posts: 705
Default Quick build

Another local quick builder 9a fuse had some
serious issues with his. The Longerons where
not formed properly so he had some problems
fitting his sub panel and panel on a slider model.
The holes where drilled in the Longerons so no changing
that. End result, much customizing of parts ensued.

I think like anything there is a percentage
that falls through the cracks. Seems most are happy.

I slow built mine. Put the 5k into the panel. The process
although time consuming is rewarding. If your like most
and can only work part time, say 4-6 months. Less if really organized
and focused.
__________________
Al Girard, Newport, RI
N339AG
RV-9
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-16-2012, 10:03 AM
schristo@mac.com's Avatar
schristo@mac.com schristo@mac.com is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 988
Default If you are making good progress, NO.

Unlike the extensive repetition of the wings, there are lots of interesting and fun build activities on the fuselage... unless you are desperate to shave off the build time the quick build is not worth it.
__________________
Stephen

RV7 powered by a lycoming thunderbolt IO-390
turning a whirlwind HRT prop

with more hours flying than building... 2,430 on the hobbs!
ORCA Flight
Race 771
margarita!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:31 AM
flybill7 flybill7 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Severna Park, Maryland
Posts: 446
Default

I estimate the QuickBuild Fuse would have saved a year out of my five year build. But I enjoyed building the fuse. It was fascinating to see it gradually turn from nothing but aluminum sheet and angle and bulkhead pieces into an airplane fuse. As others have said, it all depends on how much you like building and how fast you want to get into the air. For me, I enjoyed the building and used the $5K for other things.
__________________
Bill Cloughley
Severna Park, Maryland
RV-7 Flying (1,400 hours)
http://www.pilotbill.com
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 08-16-2012, 11:59 AM
AF_Alan's Avatar
AF_Alan AF_Alan is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 122
Default Just another datapoint

I won't offer my preference since it is a decision on time vs money that only you can make...however, my build log shows about 460 manhours from first deburring until about the QB stage. That includes alumiprep, alodine, prime all ribs and I did nearly all the riveting myself (long arms) except about 16 hours with my 14-yo daughter.

Wouldn't you need to send in your spar center section and then wait to get it returned as a QB??

Good luck!
__________________
Alan
RV-9A N984AW
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 08-16-2012, 12:17 PM
Dbro172's Avatar
Dbro172 Dbro172 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: West Fargo, ND
Posts: 1,073
Default Center Spar is interchangeable

Quote:
Originally Posted by AF_Alan View Post
Wouldn't you need to send in your spar center section and then wait to get it returned as a QB??

Good luck!
Luckily, According to Vans, the center spars are now interchangeable. If you decide to go QB fuse after SB wings, you can simply return your center spar section that came with the wing kit. You do not necessarily need to wait for that exact center section to have a fuse built around it. Vans will send you the next available QB fuse. I think they mentioned that the extra center section would eventually be sent to the QB factory to be incorporated in a future build.

This did not used to be the case... something to do with mfg. processes and tolerances now are tight enough to where the center sections are interchangeable.

I will however have a couple spare longerons, not worthy of shipping back...
__________________
Derek Hoeschen
EAA Tech Counselor
RV-9A #92103 - N803DK
G3X, Superior XO-320, Dual Pmags, Catto 3B
www.mykitlog.com/dbro172/

1974 Bellanca Super Viking - N16AW - Flying
RV-8 #83565 - N184DK - building
1968 Mooney M20C - N6801N - Sold
1956 C-182 - N744W - Sold
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 08-16-2012, 01:16 PM
g zero g zero is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: palm coast fl.
Posts: 945
Default Fus

Just finished the slow build fuselage (8) ,very straight forward , had it to quickbuild stage in about 265 hrs . Was able to paint int. before assembly , my slow build wings will be here soon. I guess it depends how much time vs money you want to invest. For me I have time.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 08-20-2012, 02:03 AM
grayforge's Avatar
grayforge grayforge is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 886
Default

I went QB Wings and Fuselage. I'll do slow build next time...

If you want to polish instead of paint, go Slow Build. My fuselage and wings had misc scratches in the finish. Ditto on the interior.

Lots of holes weren't deburred and many rivets weren't set as nicely as I'd like. Had some gaps between riveted parts too.

Also, a few mistakes. Rivets squeezed before they were supposed to be, dimples done where they shouldn't have been until the builder chose Nosewheel vs Taildragger, etc.

However, even with some rework, it obviously saves a lot of time.
__________________
Speed Is Life

VAF Donation made: 1/28/2020, My RV-7A Build Log
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.