|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

07-23-2012, 10:05 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,670
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanLandry
Excuse me, but, I don't get it.
An improvement over the 7?
Longer wing, more fuel capacity, bigger engine, slower cruise, higher stall.
Is this a 9 upgrade as the 6 was to the 7?
Help me understand it.
Maybe I missed it because it's late.
|
If you were a "Bubba" (like me), it might make sense to you. Wider, taller, more comfortable for big guys, and maybe even easier to get in and out of. It is 2.5"-3" wider, and about 2" more legroom. Should make a real difference for some body like me!
JMO, and my dos centavos. 
__________________
Pete Hunt, [San Diego] VAF #1069
RV-6, RV-6A, T-6G
ATP, CFII, A&P
2020 Donation+, Gladly Sent
Last edited by PCHunt : 07-23-2012 at 10:23 PM.
Reason: Add data
|

07-23-2012, 10:09 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 182
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Archangel
The canopy has a jettison. In the walk-around video they show a handle that'll basically eject the thing off the airplane.
|
Yep got that...just like they already have on the 7 & 9 tip up canopies. Question remains what is unique about the design that precludes having a slider option?
I also just noticed in that video that with the new leaf spring main gear design there is no longer a support structure for each gear leg protruding into the cabin.
__________________
Scott
Happy to be a 2012 and 2013 VAF supporter
|

07-23-2012, 10:35 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 324
|
|
Smaller version of RV-10?
Quote:
Originally Posted by DanLandry
Excuse me, but, I don't get it.
An improvement over the 7?
Longer wing, more fuel capacity, bigger engine, slower cruise, higher stall.
Is this a 9 upgrade as the 6 was to the 7?
Help me understand it.
Maybe I missed it because it's late.
|
I've been thinking of it from the perspective of an evolution of the 2-seat RVs - but maybe it makes mores sense to think of it as a smaller, more affordable version of the RV-10? If you don't need 4 seats, but you want a comfortable cruiser like the -10, maybe it would be your machine.
__________________
Jordan Grant
RV-6 N198G
Monthly donation started Mar '20
|

07-23-2012, 10:44 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 169
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike Macon
__________________
The 14 will become the 14A and the conventional gear model will become the 14. Van did this with the 9.
|
A quick run of the registration number on the FAA website will show that N214VA is a RV-14A.
__________________
Tyler
Newcastle, OK
N825TC
RV-14A #140754
Project Log
|

07-23-2012, 10:53 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 439
|
|
I'm laying here in my tent in HBC after a day full of RV's. It was awesome!!
I was 15 feet away when the -14 rolled to a stop and shutdown. Here's my first impression......I didn't even see it
There was so much speculation on what the new RV was going to be. Was it a UFO? My buddy and I coined it the UFRV
I said to the guy next to me, "Where's the new plane?" He said," Right there in front of you, it says 14 on the tail."
I thought it was a -10 truth be told. It's pretty big and after I found out the specs, I wasn't sure what the "mission" statement of the plane was. Who is the target market? That engine ain't cheap, so who's this RV suited for?
I went on a mission. I was 40 feet away from the RV-1, Mr. RV himself, Paul Dye, Louise, Rosie.... all the Patron Saints, so I figured this was the place to get my answer
To make a long mission short, I was told, by an American, that Americans are not getting smaller. I guess because of sedintary lifestyles, technology, affluence etc... We all is getting Bigger  As a Canadian I found this amusing.
This plane was designed and built to accommodate those folks who think the other models are too tight, yet don't want to shell out the $$ for a -10.
I found out that it's been in the works from the time the -12 was being flight tested. I also learnt a bit about the RV-5 and what the deal is there.....but that's another story
Darren
|

07-23-2012, 11:06 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,256
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darren S
I thought it was a -10 truth be told. It's pretty big and after I found out the specs, I wasn't sure what the "mission" statement of the plane was. Who is the target market? That engine ain't cheap, so who's this RV suited for?
I went on a mission. I was 40 feet away from the RV-1, Mr. RV himself, Paul Dye, Louise, Rosie.... all the Patron Saints, so I figured this was the place to get my answer
...
This plane was designed and built to accommodate those folks who think the other models are too tight, yet don't want to shell out the $$ for a -10.
|
You mean it was designed for the guys who, when we were kids, were called "husky"? 
__________________
Steve "Flying Scotsman"
Santa Clarita, CA
PP-ASEL, ASES, Instrument Airplane
RV-7A N660WS flying!
#8,000
|

07-23-2012, 11:23 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 167
|
|
Hey!
__________________
Chris
RV-8 Wings
|

07-24-2012, 12:06 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,412
|
|
As an owner and flyer of a Thorp T-18, I understand the appeal!!
I weigh (currrently) 211 lbs, and have a tall body w/ short legs. I have to
"scrunch down" in the Thorp, and my head is pretty close to the canopy in my RV-8.
I'm a little alarmed by the level of completion offered in the RV-14x, I guess that is the wave of the future, but the whole ELSA 'BUILD IT LIKE WE TELL YA' might be carried over here?
__________________
Scott Emery
http://gallery.eaa326.org/v/members/semery/
EAA 668340, chapter 326 & IAC chapter 67
RV-8 N89SE first flight 12/26/2013
Yak55M, and the wife has an RV-4
There is nothing-absolute nothing-half so much worth doing as simply messing around with Aeroplanes
(with apologies to Ratty)
2019
|

07-24-2012, 12:45 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 1,647
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHIPCHIEF
I'm a little alarmed by the level of completion offered in the RV-14x, I guess that is the wave of the future, but the whole ELSA 'BUILD IT LIKE WE TELL YA' might be carried over here?
|
Van has been talking a lot about increased safety in EAB for quite a while now, and I wouldn't be surprised if part of the thinking behind the RV-14 is to encourage more standardisation and reliability, such as by offering plug and play connectivity for a few popular avionics systems. Not to mention other benefits, such as reducing build times.
__________________
rgmwa
RV-12LR 912ULS
120346
|

07-24-2012, 12:55 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Braunfels, Germany
Posts: 10
|
|
Maybe enough room for a diesel Engine. German pilots currently pay $ 12 for a gallon of avgas. 
__________________
RV7A QB, TIPUP, TMX-IO 360 flying  , D-EMRV, Germany
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:16 AM.
|