VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 06-22-2012, 01:00 PM
yankee-flyer yankee-flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 838
Default More Funny Fuel Flow Facts

Flew 143WM for a short while this morning and made the following observations.

Density Altitude (DA) was a little more than 1000 feet greater than MSL.

During takeoff and WOT climb fuel flow (FF) readings was 5.2 - 5.3 gph UNTIL I climbed through approximately 6000' DA. From that point on FF rose slowly into the mid-7 range and stayed there when I leveled off at 6500 MSL (7700 DA) and established cruise at 5200 rpm. FF remained in the mid 7's (highest I've seen) during cruise.

I pulled the electric pump fuse. FF dropped to 0 (THAT got my attention but engine kept running) and then slowly built back up to 4.3- 4.6 with a fair amount of fluctuation. Note that I don't see much fluctuation with both pumps running.

Re-inserted the fuse and FF slowly climbed into the 7+ range again.

Descended to 4500 MSL (DA 5600) and fuel flow readout returned to "normal" 4.1 to 4.3 gph.

Landed and check fuel tank sight gauge. Used just over 2 gallons in 0.6 hours flying time. Interestingly enough, the fuel-remaining readout said I'd used 2 gallons, too.

Whatever is happening certainly seems to be related to DA.

Scott, it's hard to believe that the fuel pump would not leak below 6000 DA but would lose 3+ gph above 6000 DA. There is NO smell of fuel at any time.
I know our carbs are supposed to be altitude compensating; could some malfunction be occuring there? John and Dick have seen this with both the old and new style pumps; I'm still running the old pump at 120 hours.

Dick, I've followed John's lead in entering a return value into the Dynon-- have you done so? I don't remember seeing this behavior before that but maybe I wasn't watching since I knew the FF was off anyway.

I'm thinking we may need to forward all this to a Dynon rep???

Wayne 120241/143WM
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-22-2012, 02:37 PM
MartySantic's Avatar
MartySantic MartySantic is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Davenport, IA
Posts: 1,390
Default

Wayne,

That is a very interesting dataset. During future flights, I will try to remember the density altitude when the fuel flow rises. What you observe with fuel flow is VERY close to what I am observing.

YES, forward your data and text to Dynon and request their analysis. Would love to see their response.
__________________
Marty Santic ----- W9EAA
RV-12 N128MS ----- Now Flying
My RV-12 Build Log - http://www.martysrv12.blogspot.com/
Davenport, IA
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-22-2012, 05:06 PM
BigJohn BigJohn is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gloversville, NY
Posts: 1,587
Default

Wayne and Marty,

Both times I have seen this behavior it has been above 6000' or so DA. I never really thought about it before, but you're right, that is where it occurs. Interesting. Yes, let's get a weigh-in from Dynon on this.

John
__________________
John Peck, CFII, A&P, EAA Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor.
?Master Pilot? Award, UFO Member.
RV-12 N37JP 120176 Flying since 2012.
One Week Wonder Build Team, OSH 2018.
VAF paid through 10/2019.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-25-2012, 07:44 PM
yankee-flyer yankee-flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 838
Default Response today from Dynon

Got this back today-- I think the answer is yes but I want to check the plans

Wayne

Wayne,

I wonder if this has something to do with where the fuel flow transducer is located. I believe there is a return fuel line.


Is the fuel flow sensor installed in line between the gascolator and the fuel pump? I wonder if the error you are seeing is caused by the amount of flow being returned to the fuel tank by the fuel return line at the fuel splitter.

Mike H
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-01-2012, 09:20 AM
jersey jersey is offline
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wharton, Texas
Posts: 122
Default Same Thing

Just returned from a Dallas trip where I was cruising at 9500'. My fuel burn was 7 gph and my fuel pressure was indicating 4.1 psig. About an hour and a half into the trip my fuel burn dropped to 5.0 gph and fuel pressure dropped to 3.2 psig. It seemed as though they are related. Question is... have ya'll checked your pressure when your fuel burn changes radically at the same power settings??

Potential variables
1. Dynon "read out" changes with altitude.
2. Fuel pressure changes with altitude influencing the actual flow of fuel through the fuel line / flow meter.
3. Carbs are actually using the fuel causing the high fuel burn rate.

Just wondering.


Jersey
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-01-2012, 06:35 PM
BigJohn BigJohn is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gloversville, NY
Posts: 1,587
Default

The last time I experienced this the flow jumped up into the 9 - 10 range, and the pressure did not change at all. I plotted it out from the Dynon data.
__________________
John Peck, CFII, A&P, EAA Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor.
?Master Pilot? Award, UFO Member.
RV-12 N37JP 120176 Flying since 2012.
One Week Wonder Build Team, OSH 2018.
VAF paid through 10/2019.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-01-2012, 08:06 PM
RV10inOz's Avatar
RV10inOz RV10inOz is offline
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Brisbane Qld. Aust.
Posts: 2,271
Default

Just stumbled onto this thread, but I see some crazy numbers here.

The Rotax at WOT sea level should be pulling more than 5.2GPH, more like almost double that. The carboy is pressure compensating, so you will see changes.

Is there a fuel return line involved on these? and where is the measurement taken?

Just food for thought.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-01-2012, 08:40 PM
yankee-flyer yankee-flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 838
Cool Please send your readings

to:

Support@dynon.com, addressed to Mike H. I think there are several of us seeing this, probably more than we know about. Flew for 1.4 hours Saturday, all at or below 6000 DA (roughly) and fuel flow was a steady 4.1 - 4.2 gph. I thought about checking pressure, but not while I was seeing the funny readings. I'll do that next time I climb higher. You guys flying to Oshkosh might have a good chance to check this phenomenon out.

Meanwhile, the more people that Dynon hear from the more likely thay are to do something.

Wayne 120241/143WM
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-01-2012, 08:43 PM
yankee-flyer yankee-flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 838
Default Great info John

Can you forward your plots to Dynon? Physically, there is no way (is there??) that the fuel flow rate can increase significantly in a constant diameter line if the pressure doesn't change. At least, that's what I think Bernoulli said.

Wayne 120241/143WM
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-02-2012, 07:56 AM
BigJohn BigJohn is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gloversville, NY
Posts: 1,587
Default Scanned RPM/Pressure/Flow graph sent....

.... to Mike just now. Wayne, keep in mind that the fuel system measures flow in between the two pumps, and measures pressure after the two pumps. It is concievable that for some unknown reason the return flow to the tank increases dramatically during this event. Doesn't seem likely, but could explain the high rate of flow.

If you want to see the graph, send me an email at johnpeck@nycap.rr.com.

John
__________________
John Peck, CFII, A&P, EAA Tech Counselor, Flight Advisor.
?Master Pilot? Award, UFO Member.
RV-12 N37JP 120176 Flying since 2012.
One Week Wonder Build Team, OSH 2018.
VAF paid through 10/2019.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:43 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.