VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > The Never Ending Debate Section > Tools
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #171  
Old 02-16-2012, 11:30 AM
WAM120RV WAM120RV is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Coventry. England
Posts: 614
Default Compliment

Allan

The best compliment I can give you is to ask whether you are really Dilbert in this cartoon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlJsPa6UwcM

I love your intuitive answers to 'our' problems.
__________________
http://www.aerobuilder.blogspot.com


Steve Arnold
England

In completion stage of Loehle P5151
Built and now Flying G.BVLR Vans RV4
Rebuilt G.BDBD Tailwind
Rebuilt G BVTN Kitfox
Built G CDCD RV9A with WAM120
Riveted wings on Glastar G.LEZZ Now (G. SKUA)

Last edited by WAM120RV : 02-16-2012 at 11:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #172  
Old 02-16-2012, 11:41 AM
380mxc's Avatar
380mxc 380mxc is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Pa...
Posts: 47
Default Variables.

L is a variable for handle length
Bottom line if you use .8 and your handle is longer than 12 inches your bolts will be under torqued.

http://gizmodo.com/5881485/pilot-sav...ched-in-flight

Safety First

Tim

Last edited by 380mxc : 02-16-2012 at 12:01 PM. Reason: to be more clear
Reply With Quote
  #173  
Old 02-16-2012, 11:53 AM
gstone gstone is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Johnson City TN
Posts: 196
Default

L is not substituted for the length of your torque wrench. .8 was determined bu the length of the extension being 3 inches and it multiplying the torque by .25 (becasue it is one fourth of the length of a foot lb) thereby needing a reduction at the setting of whatever torque wrench to .8 of the desired torque product. The torque applied to the extension to get 100 lbs of torque will be 80 lbs set on ANY wrench no matter the length of said wrench.
Reply With Quote
  #174  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:22 PM
erich weaver's Avatar
erich weaver erich weaver is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,681
Default

Just when I had hopes this was reaching a resolution...

Its not like primer wars or the nose dragger/tail dragger arguments. One side is just plain wrong here.

Bob K's drawings and explanations seemed simple and straightforward. Can Allan or others in the "0.8 is a constant" camp explain succinctly where they are in error? Simply insisting that 0.8 is a constant as proven through 7th grade math isnt very convincing. There are some experienced, smart folks that made it through 7th grade and well beyond that say otherwise, and they have some convincing documentation that appears to back them up. I have yet to see ANY published documentation that makes the case for using a constant multiplier for a torque wrench extension of a given size regardless of the length of the torque wrench. Staying open minded however...

Somebody kidnap Dan Horton and refuse to release him until he takes a stand on this

erich

Last edited by erich weaver : 02-16-2012 at 12:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #175  
Old 02-16-2012, 12:42 PM
mike newall's Avatar
mike newall mike newall is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Yorkshire, England
Posts: 2,048
Default

Steve,

Brilliant........

Sent to all the mechanics I know
__________________
"I add a little excitement, a little spice to your lives, and all you do is complain!" - Q

Donated in 2020
Reply With Quote
  #176  
Old 02-16-2012, 01:17 PM
PerfTech's Avatar
PerfTech PerfTech is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Redlands, Ca.
Posts: 1,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WAM120RV View Post
Allan

The best compliment I can give you is to ask whether you are really Dilbert in this cartoon. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlJsPa6UwcM

I love your intuitive answers to 'our' problems.
Thank you Steve for the compliment! I am beginning to feel like him (Delbert). This thread is actually beginning to scare me. The lack of understanding I am witnessing here could potentially have costly or dire consequences impacting safety. I am somewhat in disbelief!
__________________
Allan Nimmo
AntiSplatAero.com
Innovative Aircraft Safety
Products, Tools & Services
Info@AntiSplatAero.com
Southern California (KREI)
RV-9A / Edge-540
(909) 824-1020
Reply With Quote
  #177  
Old 02-16-2012, 01:19 PM
Bob Kuykendall's Avatar
Bob Kuykendall Bob Kuykendall is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Douglas Flat, CA
Posts: 588
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PerfTech View Post
...
Now forget all you think you know about this and listen. Pretend for a moment you have no idea what a torque wrench is and have never seen one. The .8 multiplier is a constant that applies to our prop wrench and does not change. Our 3" tool is simply a torque multiplier period, nothing else. If you use this tool on your bolts, it and it alone boosts the power of what ever devise you use to tighten the bolts by a factor of plus 20%. That requires you to set your tool, be it your weight lifter mother in-law or a heavy rock on a rope to EXACTLY 80% of the desired value. THIS IS A FACT AND WILL NOT CHANGE under any circumstances. This is 7th grade math, not rocket science. If you are looking for 70ft.lb. on your bolts 70 X .8= 56ft.lb. setting on what ever you use to pull with.
... Now I need to search out a formula to re-calculate the 3.1416 number in pie as it will no longer hold true because I am using a longer pencil to do the math.
I'm sorry, but all the color, exclamation points, and emoticons in the world aren't going to make you right. Go back to your statics textbook and study the chapters on moments and rigid bodies. As I have shown, they are the basis for the simple applications of physics behind the formulas for torque wrench correction embodied in AC43.13.

Edit Add: Really, I encourage you to find a real mechanical engineer and have them explain this to you. Trust me, it will be better for you and for your ability to develop and promote your products.

Thanks, Bob K.
__________________
Bob Kuykendall
HP-24 kit sailplane
EAA Technical Counselor

Last edited by Bob Kuykendall : 02-16-2012 at 01:31 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #178  
Old 02-16-2012, 01:30 PM
Birkelbach Birkelbach is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Waller, Texas
Posts: 146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PerfTech View Post
Bob has it exactly!!!!!!!!!
Now forget all you think you know about this and listen. Pretend for a moment you have no idea what a torque wrench is and have never seen one. The .8 multiplier is a constant that applies to our prop wrench and does not change. Our 3" tool is simply a torque multiplier period, nothing else. <<SNIP>>
If I forget all that I know about this then I guess I could be convinced that you are correct, but you are NOT correct. Your little device is NOT a torque multiplier. It is a lever. A lever is a FORCE MULTIPLIER. The math has been done here to the extent that I don't know why we are still arguing about it but let me try my hand.

Say I have a 2' long torque wrench. I grip the wrench on it's handle and apply 100 ft-lbs of torque to it. That'll be 50 lbs of force at the handle. Now I add your extension, and apply that same 50 lbs of force (the wrench will still read 100 ft-lbs because it has no way of knowing about the extension). Now I am applying 50 lbs of force at a distance of 2.25 ft. That is 112.5 ft-lbs. That is a multiplier of 0.8889 and 0.8889 is not equal to 0.8.

Guys seriously. This is not complicated. These are prop bolts that we are talking about. Let's get it right.
__________________
Phil Birkelbach
RV-7 727WB - Flying
Pitts S1C - Restoration
Christavia Mk1 - Fuselage
www.myrv7.com
Reply With Quote
  #179  
Old 02-16-2012, 01:31 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Kuykendall View Post
I'm sorry, but all the color, exclamation points, and emoticons in the world aren't going to make you right. Go back to your statics textbook and study the chapters on moments and rigid bodies. As I have shown, they are the basis for the simple applications of physics behind the formulas for torque wrench correction embodied in AC43.13.
I'd still like to see definate proof, beyond all doubt...........that the spring release mechanism of a "click" torque wrench, has to comply with the same physics that apply to a beam torque wrench. While the tables presented so far, make perfect sense for a "beam", how do they really relate to a compressed spring?

L.Adamson
Reply With Quote
  #180  
Old 02-16-2012, 01:34 PM
ccsmith51's Avatar
ccsmith51 ccsmith51 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 1,077
Lightbulb I wonder...

if this is all a very clever marketing plan to keep the wrench at the top of the new posts lists for days on end...
__________________
Chris Smith
Maule M5-180C (Sold)
RV-6 O-360 CS (Sold)
RV-4 O-360 FP (Sold)
Full-time in the other type of RV....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.