VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > The Never Ending Debate Section > Tools
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 02-13-2012, 02:15 PM
PerfTech's Avatar
PerfTech PerfTech is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Redlands, Ca.
Posts: 1,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by erich weaver View Post
Growing weary of this as Im sure are others, but I never read/heard Allan say that the 0.8 was only an example. The quote above from Allan's earlier post, as well as the product video, seems to say that if your torque wrench measures in ft lbs, that 0.8 is the correct multiplier. I say, (as does Walt I believe) that is not necessarily the case. Ya gotta measure the length of your torque wrench and if its not 12 inches, you better do the math or plug in the numbers to the handy calculator web site that was posted to see what value to set your wrench at when using the extension.

Do you agree Allan?

And for the record, love you man, product on order

erich
All foot lb. torque wrenches are the same regardless of handle overall length. The overall length only effects how hard you need to pull on it. on a foot lb. torque wrench the .8 multiplier is exactly and always the number. It is not rounded off and it never changes as long as the crows foot or our tool is 3" and in installed straight. If you install it on the torque wrench at 90 degrees the multiplier is 0, at a 45 degree angle it is .9. This is simple math and does not change.
__________________
Allan Nimmo
AntiSplatAero.com
Innovative Aircraft Safety
Products, Tools & Services
Info@AntiSplatAero.com
Southern California (KREI)
RV-9A / Edge-540
(909) 824-1020
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 02-13-2012, 03:11 PM
Garage Guy's Avatar
Garage Guy Garage Guy is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego
Posts: 457
Default

So you are saying if it is a ft-lb wrench: (12")/(12"+3") = 0.8

And if it is a newton-meter wrench: (39.37")/(39.37"+3") = 0.929

And if it is an inch-lb wrench: (1")/(1"+3") = 0.25

I don't think so!

As a bunch of folks have pointed out, your correction factor should be (wrench length in inches) / (wrench length in inches + 3"), it doesn't matter what the scale is calibrated in. A lot of torque wrenches have both metric and SAE scales for example.

Of course "wrench length" doesn't include the length of any cheater bar. It is the designed length of the wrench, from the handle pivot to the socket axis.

--Paul
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 02-13-2012, 03:14 PM
schristo@mac.com's Avatar
schristo@mac.com schristo@mac.com is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 988
Default Interesting...

Quote:
Originally Posted by PerfTech View Post
All foot lb. torque wrenches are the same regardless of handle overall length. The overall length only effects how hard you need to pull on it. on a foot lb. torque wrench the .8 multiplier is exactly and always the number. It is not rounded off and it never changes as long as the crows foot or our tool is 3" and in installed straight. If you install it on the torque wrench at 90 degrees the multiplier is 0, at a 45 degree angle it is .9. This is simple math and does not change.

It is my understanding that torque wrenches are calibrated from the center of the handle and that is the lever distance to be used for accurate torque and extension calculation. Where you grip effects the amount of bending moment within the tool which is properly accounted for only at the calibration point; middle of the handle. I have never seen reference to a lever length other than from the calibration point to the ratchet head.

If two similar torque wrenches, one long and one short were both calibrated at 12" the lever calculation would be the same (or very similar), however, they are calibrated at their respective handles to generate an indicated torque at the ratchet head which impacts the internal pawl size or beam arm mechanism along with the bending of the wrench itself.

Always torque from the calibration point, the handle... never use a cheater bar to make it easier to get a torque value, at least if you hope for an accurate torque.
__________________
Stephen

RV7 powered by a lycoming thunderbolt IO-390
turning a whirlwind HRT prop

with more hours flying than building... 2,430 on the hobbs!
ORCA Flight
Race 771
margarita!

Last edited by schristo@mac.com : 02-13-2012 at 03:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 02-13-2012, 03:52 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Assume that a nut needs exactly a one quarter turn more(90 degrees), to hit the exact specified torque value. Let's say the torque wrench is 12" long.

Get a ten foot cheater bar, and it's still going to be just a 90 degree movement. The "push" required at the end of the ten foot bar, is much less than that at 12", but the traveled distance is much farther. Works just like a block & tackle. Whether it's 12" or ten feet, the torque value of the nut, remains the same.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 02-13-2012, 04:17 PM
PerfTech's Avatar
PerfTech PerfTech is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Redlands, Ca.
Posts: 1,457
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schristo@mac.com View Post
It is my understanding that torque wrenches are calibrated from the center of the handle and that is the lever distance to be used for accurate torque and extension calculation. Where you grip effects the amount of bending moment within the tool which is properly accounted for only at the calibration point; middle of the handle. I have never seen reference to a lever length other than from the calibration point to the ratchet head.

If two similar torque wrenches, one long and one short were both calibrated at 12" the lever calculation would be the same (or very similar), however, they are calibrated at their respective handles to generate an indicated torque at the ratchet head which impacts the internal pawl size or beam arm mechanism along with the bending of the wrench itself.

Always torque from the calibration point, the handle... never use a cheater bar to make it easier to get a torque value, at least if you hope for an accurate torque.
The cheater bar was only stated to demonstrate a point or principal, not a suggestion. As for torque wrenches that are calibrated from the handle, the only ones that are sensitive to this are the old school bending beam type that depend on the entire beam length to flex giving the indication. That type has a pivoting handle to address this issue. None of this has anything to do with the .8 multiplier or click type, gauge pull type, flex shaft internal, twisting shaft or load cell type wrenches. If the wrench is in foot pounds the correction factor with our wrench is .8, if in inch pounds it is .8 X 12. Thanks, Allan
__________________
Allan Nimmo
AntiSplatAero.com
Innovative Aircraft Safety
Products, Tools & Services
Info@AntiSplatAero.com
Southern California (KREI)
RV-9A / Edge-540
(909) 824-1020
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 02-13-2012, 04:34 PM
schristo@mac.com's Avatar
schristo@mac.com schristo@mac.com is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: WA
Posts: 988
Default problem is in measurement...

Quote:
Originally Posted by L.Adamson View Post
Assume that a nut needs exactly a one quarter turn more(90 degrees), to hit the exact specified torque value. Let's say the torque wrench is 12" long.

Get a ten foot cheater bar, and it's still going to be just a 90 degree movement. The "push" required at the end of the ten foot bar, is much less than that at 12", but the traveled distance is much farther. Works just like a block & tackle. Whether it's 12" or ten feet, the torque value of the nut, remains the same.
The problem is with the torque measurement. With and without the cheater bar the wrench will indicate that the specified torque is reached at different physical points... The method of measurement is pretty finicky. A cheater bar will place a levered load onto the wrench itself applying both an upward force and downward force (assuming a tube shaped cheater is slipped over the wrench) which will impact the measured torque at the head. How much will depend on how deep the cheater is inserted, how much force leverage is being applied, how different the material and physical properties of the wrench and cheater are for bending...

in the end none of this likely matters much though since we are dealing with pretty broad torque ranges but don't get fooled into thinking that the torque you dial up or read is pin point accurate. CDI calls calibration less than 20% 'minor'.

Good technique with a well calibrated wrench is still likely +/- 5%. It would not surprise me to see a typical tool box torque wrench with poor technique off 30% or more. Even at that error most mid torques values that we are dealing with are pretty safe. I recall a discussion here where someone was consistently braking off AN3 bolts with their torque wrench... turned out he was using ftlbs rather than inlbs... not surprising that he was breaking bolts.



To get this thread back on track...

Great solution for prop bolts! I ordered one this morning
__________________
Stephen

RV7 powered by a lycoming thunderbolt IO-390
turning a whirlwind HRT prop

with more hours flying than building... 2,430 on the hobbs!
ORCA Flight
Race 771
margarita!

Last edited by schristo@mac.com : 02-13-2012 at 04:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 02-13-2012, 05:46 PM
erich weaver's Avatar
erich weaver erich weaver is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: santa barbara, CA
Posts: 1,681
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by schristo@mac.com View Post
Wrench torque = desired bolt torque * (wrench length / total length)

For a wrench length (to the handle centerline) of 12" with a 3" extension you have (12 / 15) or .8


Quote:
Originally Posted by PerfTech View Post
That is correct, this is why the .8 multiplier. Thanks, Allan

Still cant see the logic behind how the 0.8 can be a constant, regardless of the length of the torque wrench. From the quotes above, Allan seems to acknowledge that the 0.8 value was arrived at based on a wrench length of 12 inches. It therefore stands to reason that if you use a different wrench that is NOT 12 inches long, (dont confuse the issue with cheater bars - I mean a DIFFERENT WRENCH) the multiplier will be something other than 0.8. You cant have it both ways - its either based on the wrench length or its not.

Somebody find the flaw in my logic and put this to rest. Funny how little things like this can gnaw at you late at night when you should be sleeping...

erich
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 02-13-2012, 07:31 PM
PerfTech's Avatar
PerfTech PerfTech is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Redlands, Ca.
Posts: 1,457
Default

I will try this one more time. Forget the length of your wrench, Forget cheater bars and everything else. If you have a torque wrench that you currently use to torque things in foot lbs. and you want to torque a bolt to 100 foot lb. you set your wrench or reed your gauge at 100. If you use our prop wrench with your torque wrench and want 100 foot lbs. you set or read your torque wrench to 80 foot lbs. You do not need to do any math or calculations of any kind. We have done that for you. Allan
__________________
Allan Nimmo
AntiSplatAero.com
Innovative Aircraft Safety
Products, Tools & Services
Info@AntiSplatAero.com
Southern California (KREI)
RV-9A / Edge-540
(909) 824-1020
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 02-13-2012, 07:43 PM
LifeofReiley's Avatar
LifeofReiley LifeofReiley is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,778
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PerfTech View Post
I will try this one more time. Forget the length of your wrench, Forget cheater bars and everything else. If you have a torque wrench that you currently use to torque things in foot lbs. and you want to torque a bolt to 100 foot lb. you set your wrench or reed your gauge at 100. If you use our prop wrench with your torque wrench and want 100 foot lbs. you set or read your torque wrench to 80 foot lbs. You do not need to do any math or calculations of any kind. We have done that for you. Allan
Allan... looks like the design has stirred up the math. I get it. Thanks for another Great Product!
__________________
Reiley
Retired N622DR - Serial #V7A1467
VAF# 671
Repeat Offender / Race 007
Friend of the RV-1
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 02-13-2012, 07:46 PM
rv8guy's Avatar
rv8guy rv8guy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Watkinsville, GA
Posts: 626
Default

The constant is the 3 inch extension. The torque is applied to it, not the nut.

Stimulating discussion
__________________
Marshall Jacobson

"Miss Sue"

RV-8 80749 slow build taildragger
7.5 year build first flight Dec 2005
SOLD at 540 hours and 10 years of FUN
N68AK
Watkinsville, Georgia
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:58 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.