|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

01-04-2012, 09:02 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 3,547
|
|
Better fuel economy
its a bit like an infinitely variable gearbox (thats transmission in American).
Frank
|

01-04-2012, 09:07 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,652
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by schristo@mac.com
come on guys... someone is poking for 'fun'...
|
That's what I was thinking....
Don't fall for it guys!
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.
Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
|

01-04-2012, 09:36 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Fairmont MN
Posts: 41
|
|
I Don't Get it!!!
My O my did did that shake the hornets nest. I must admit everyone is passionate about this subject.
|

01-05-2012, 04:16 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: McMinnville, Oregon: HOME of the SPRUCE GOOSE
Posts: 540
|
|
RV's are experimental. Do what you want.
Just don't get sucked into an old debate :-)
Different configuration on anything is because people like different things.
I have had both C/S and F/P, like many other pilots here.
They both have advantages and disadvantages for different missions.
Just meet your mission and your good to go...
__________________
Tailwinds...
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.
Leonardo Da Vinci
Working on a RV-4
Citabria 7GCBC
Cessna 180
RV7 I0-360 C/S, Slider, AP, Glass, etc. sold.
RV6 O-320 F/P, Slider, AP, Steam, etc., sold
Citabria 7KCAB rental
Piper Cherokee, sold
Sparrowhawk, sold
Proud -VAF- Supporter - Exempt, Dues Paid Anyway.
|

01-05-2012, 05:20 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 426
|
|
Cg on the rv7 is better with cs
On your Rv7 the cg will be much better with a CS prop along with all the other benefits. I have had both on my rv7, and like the CS.
__________________
John Adams
Seattle
RV7 600+hrs
Paid 12/2014
|

01-05-2012, 05:36 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newport, TN
Posts: 7,496
|
|
A friend of mine usually fly alongside another friend that has a CS. We both have FP. All three have 180hp engines.
His has some differences over our FP planes.
1. He can take off ~10% sooner than us.
2. He can climb at a greater rate than us.
3. He looks like he threw a boat anchor out when he pulls the power off.
4. He has no problems with his empty CG where I have to limit baggage.
Top speed is a wash, slight advantage to the FP but it all depends on FP RPM and his RPM and MP.
While we can't climb at his rate, we can go faster while he is climbing. Net result is we can basically end up in the same place at the same time by leveraging that speed. We just do it at a shallower angle. He gets to altitude quickly but then must catch up to us.
If he is in front of us on a group arrival, we must give him room or we will eat his lunch on base and final. He can slow down instantly and we cannot.
|

01-05-2012, 05:45 AM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Hangar/home at Hicks Airfield (T67), Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 629
|
|
FP vs CS
Quote:
Originally Posted by schristo@mac.com
come on guys... someone is poking for 'fun'...
|
I totally agree! Surely this guy is just trying to stir things up on the forum and he has succeeded. It's like asking "Do you prefer a Garmin portable or an iPad for VFR flight".
Opinions start flying and the posts to the forum go up, woo hoo!  BTW....I STILL prefer my iPad!
__________________
Mike Reddick
VAF#153
Pilots N Paws Pilot
RV6A N167CW 1,900 HRS
Ft Worth, TX (T67)
|

01-07-2012, 05:48 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 32
|
|
as a pilot i like C/S because i have more control over the flight profile, i.e, better climb / cruise / descent, better fuel economy, better for acro and formation and of course the most important aspect is another knob to play with
as a mechanic / owner i dislike the C/S because it more expensive to purchase, a PITA to install and remove, higher cost of maintenance and another reason not to let the airplane sit for too long (seals dry out and oil seeps)
That being said: I am still gonna put a C/S on the front of my -8 but intstead of goin with the IO-390 i dream of, Im doin an IO-360 180hp
__________________
only 2 moon landings so far, still a rookie.
|

01-07-2012, 08:26 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: torrance, ca
Posts: 650
|
|
Would you ever buy a car with a one-speed transmission?
|

01-07-2012, 08:35 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: broussard louisiana
Posts: 155
|
|
I would buy the car with one speed if it cost 1/4 the price and performed within 5% of a car with multiple speed transmission and had virtually no maintenance. We will all end up at our destination with a separation measured in a few minutes...
__________________
Ben Bell
RV8 (sold)
Awaiting Kitfox SS7 kit
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:42 AM.
|