|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

12-23-2011, 04:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
|
|
My Work days ended on September 30, 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmax
Sounds like you've put 'er to the test. This is reassuing. Thx for the reply.
(oh, and guess you work nights too?
|
I have worked many nights but I just wake up at night now.
Bob Axsom
|

12-23-2011, 08:23 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Martinsville, IN
Posts: 470
|
|
Thx Pierre
Had a nice, informative conversation with Mr. Pierre Smith. You know, to be able to hear what is wrote in these forums, is way better than guessing the emotions that are put behind the words. My concerns have been settled.
Good bunch of folks here. Happy holidays to you all....DM, IND 
|

12-23-2011, 08:27 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Martinsville, IN
Posts: 470
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvbuilder2002
Clarification -
The nose gear leg introduced in 1998 as a replacement was to correct a fatigue life issue that was discovered. It was not to make the leg stronger and able to take more abuse.
Fatigue life is for the most part based on flexing cycles (how many times it flexes up and down, not how hard the flex is. Than is why it was fully acceptable to continue using the original gear leg as long as recurring inspections were done.
The original service bulletin can be found HERE
|
Ok, you state fatigue life. They didn't change the material of steel, or anything like that, right? Please clerify your meaning. Thx, DM
|

12-23-2011, 10:44 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 9,035
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by drmax
Ok, you state fatigue life. They didn't change the material of steel, or anything like that, right? Please clerify your meaning. Thx, DM
|
Material is the same, manufacturing and finishing processes, and overall design are different.
In simple terms, Static strength is related to a load that can be exerted before a component fails. Fatigue strength is related to the number of times (or cycles) that a component can have a load (something less than what would exceed the static load limit) applied before it fails from fatigue.
A simple example of fatigue failure would be when you bend a paper clip back and forth a bunch of times until it fractures. Each time you bent it, you did not fail the material because it is rather soft (weak in static strength), but it will eventually fail from fatigue (when the material fractures). Fatigue failure is typically progressive. As in a very small crack forms, and then continues to grow until it is detected by inspection, or it fails under load since the existence of the crack is reducing the static strength.
That's the best I can do in a few words... maybe someone else will have a better explanation.
|

12-23-2011, 11:19 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Martinsville, IN
Posts: 470
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvbuilder2002
Material is the same, manufacturing and finishing processes, and overall design are different.
In simple terms, Static strength is related to a load that can be exerted before a component fails. Fatigue strength is related to the number of times (or cycles) that a component can have a load (something less than what would exceed the static load limit) applied before it fails from fatigue.
A simple example of fatigue failure would be when you bend a paper clip back and forth a bunch of times until it fractures. Each time you bent it, you did not fail the material because it is rather soft (weak in static strength), but it will eventually fail from fatigue (when the material fractures). Fatigue failure is typically progressive. As in a very small crack forms, and then continues to grow until it is detected by inspection, or it fails under load since the existence of the crack is reducing the static strength.
That's the best I can do in a few words... maybe someone else will have a better explanation.
|
Thank you and I completely understand. Thx for taking your time to explain.
Regards, DM
|

12-24-2011, 12:02 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 112
|
|
6A Nose Gear
My 6A has been flying since 1999 so has the upgraded leg but the original nose wheel fork. I have nearly 1000 hours on the plane and have made many landings on grass strips. Not all the grass strips were particularly smooth or flat. So far I have not had a problem and think much is down to landing technique. As most have said make sure you land on the main wheels and stay off the brakes. However there is one modification I would make and that is to replace the Matco wheel bearing and axle. I replace mine with the Grove wheel system and it is a great improvement as you can tighten up the wheel nut correctly but will still have the wheel rotating freely. Since the Grove wheel and axle came out Beringer in France have brought out an even improved system with a tubless tire. This sytem is slightly more expensive than the Grove one but if I were gong to do it again I would go with the Beringer who advertise on this site.
Barry RV6A F-PRVM
|

12-24-2011, 12:23 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Martinsville, IN
Posts: 470
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barry
My 6A has been flying since 1999 so has the upgraded leg but the original nose wheel fork. I have nearly 1000 hours on the plane and have made many landings on grass strips. Not all the grass strips were particularly smooth or flat. So far I have not had a problem and think much is down to landing technique. As most have said make sure you land on the main wheels and stay off the brakes. However there is one modification I would make and that is to replace the Matco wheel bearing and axle. I replace mine with the Grove wheel system and it is a great improvement as you can tighten up the wheel nut correctly but will still have the wheel rotating freely. Since the Grove wheel and axle came out Beringer in France have brought out an even improved system with a tubless tire. This sytem is slightly more expensive than the Grove one but if I were gong to do it again I would go with the Beringer who advertise on this site.
Barry RV6A F-PRVM
|
Thx and info noted...
|

12-24-2011, 02:29 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 94
|
|
|

12-24-2011, 03:02 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Martinsville, IN
Posts: 470
|
|
wow
Quote:
Originally Posted by jongurley
|
I like to compression test video as well. ****, seems this is the easiest way to remedy this entire issue. I giggled when the guy said " you can work around that and never make a mistake". Yep, that's just the problem and this part looks like a good safety measure. Thank you for relaying this to me. DM
Last edited by drmax : 12-24-2011 at 03:08 AM.
|

12-24-2011, 06:14 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Laurel, DE
Posts: 347
|
|
I bought the anti-splat mod. I have already done Van's SB mod.
I have also installed a new front fork allowing me to use a mainwheel on the nose - bigger size. With that, I put larger tires on the stock main rims.
I fly primarily from grass - great safety factor for me.....
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:16 AM.
|