VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

View Poll Results: Engine size selection
Initially O-320 or smaller 33 21.43%
Later increased power/installed larger engine 6 3.90%
Later decreased power/installed smaller engine 0 0%
Initially O-360 or larger 118 76.62%
Later increased power/installed larger engine 3 1.95%
Later decreased power/installed smaller engine 1 0.65%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 154. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-12-2007, 06:05 AM
N184JG N184JG is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: OWASSO,OK
Posts: 192
Default

The engine for my 8A is an ECI kit with cold air induction,LASAR,high compression pistons and Vetterman tuned exhaust (not available from Vans).It should put out about the same HP as the IO-390 for $18000 less cost.Plan first flight next month.
__________________
Jim Gallaway VAF#782 2013 PAID 2014 paid
Gundys airport
Owasso,Ok
RV8A N184JG FLYING SOLD
RV7 N1717G FLYING sold
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-12-2007, 07:40 AM
N184JG N184JG is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: OWASSO,OK
Posts: 192
Default

And Airflow Performance F.I.
__________________
Jim Gallaway VAF#782 2013 PAID 2014 paid
Gundys airport
Owasso,Ok
RV8A N184JG FLYING SOLD
RV7 N1717G FLYING sold
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-14-2007, 09:09 PM
Ron Lee's Avatar
Ron Lee Ron Lee is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,275
Default My initial thoughts on engine size

I assumed that the O-360 or larger would be the majority choice and it was.

I did not expect anyone with a larger engine to change to one of less horsepower.

I expected more O-320s to later change to more power than O-360. Percentage wise that happened even with this small sample size.

I am one of the O-360 that is changing to higher horsepower. Since I was forced to overhaul the engine (in progress) I decided to go to 9.2:1 pistons. After mucho research on up to 10:1 pistons I was going to use 9.5:1 but could not find affordable ones. Some cautioned against higher than 8.5 pistons (can't use auto fuel and lowered TBO). I have no desire to use auto fuel and at the altitudes I fly at the engine rarely even sees 75% power.

Then I bought a high performance camshaft from Sky King that may provide more torque.

Finally I had the new cylinders ported and flow matched by Lycon. Some articles suggest 4 HP or more improvement from this process. Even if that is not accurate, the process should even the combustion process and help make a smoother running engine.

What all this means in actual performance is to be seen.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-06-2011, 05:47 PM
LifeofReiley's Avatar
LifeofReiley LifeofReiley is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,778
Default

250 hrs now on the O-320 in the 7A, put a many O-360's in the prop wash.
With fuel prices soaring up up up... I'm liking the 320 more & more each and everyday.
__________________
Reiley
Retired N622DR - Serial #V7A1467
VAF# 671
Repeat Offender / Race 007
Friend of the RV-1
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-06-2011, 06:15 PM
Chappyd Chappyd is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 321
Default

IO-360 M1B with a Hartzell CS prop. 180 hp and I can't imagine what I would do with more hp.
__________________
Dave Chapdelaine
N821RV
RV-7
Flying as of 7/2/11
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-06-2011, 06:47 PM
hydroguy2's Avatar
hydroguy2 hydroguy2 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Townsend, Montana
Posts: 3,179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chappyd View Post
IO-360 M1B with a Hartzell CS prop. 180 hp and I can't imagine what I would do with more hp.
you'd join SARL and go racing!
__________________
Retired Dam guy. Life is good.
Brian, N155BKsold but bought back.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-06-2011, 07:36 PM
Danger Will Robinson Danger Will Robinson is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Zephyrhills FL
Posts: 54
Default

The best advice I got when I was considering the purchase of a used RV6 was "Get the big engine" The only minus is the initial purchase price and I think someone said that is only about $1500. If you want the lower fuel burn and power of the O320 just limit how far you push the throttle in.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_rated

Last edited by Danger Will Robinson : 11-06-2011 at 07:39 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-06-2011, 08:54 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Danger Will Robinson View Post
The best advice I got when I was considering the purchase of a used RV6 was "Get the big engine" The only minus is the initial purchase price and I think someone said that is only about $1500. If you want the lower fuel burn and power of the O320 just limit how far you push the throttle in.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flat_rated
And pulling the throttle out...........works. My 0360 RV6A could get right down to the lower fuel consumption, that a 9A uses with it's 0320. On the other hand, I can climb faster, and ultimately cruise faster, when desired.

L.Adamson
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-07-2011, 05:41 AM
LifeofReiley's Avatar
LifeofReiley LifeofReiley is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,778
Default

Heck... you should have went with the Big Engine... IO390 or IO540 in your RV and then add a designated fuel credit card you can just leave in the plane.
__________________
Reiley
Retired N622DR - Serial #V7A1467
VAF# 671
Repeat Offender / Race 007
Friend of the RV-1
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-07-2011, 06:47 AM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LifeofReiley View Post
Heck... you should have went with the Big Engine... IO390 or IO540 in your RV and then add a designated fuel credit card you can just leave in the plane.
Bigger engines can help you escape density altitude problems. Although, the plan is to avoid them in the first place, it seems that a lot of pilots still get caught with the problem. The ability to quickly climb, has much to do with horsepower..... As I live in mountain country, the extra horses are worth it.

L.Adamson
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.