VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-10
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-30-2011, 06:59 PM
Bill.Peyton's Avatar
Bill.Peyton Bill.Peyton is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,788
Default TruTrak Pitch Servo Issue

Installed the pitch servo using the Tru Trak supplied bracket and hardware. I am concerned that the torque multipier arm could get hung up on the top rear bolt head. I ended up shimming the oposite end with an additional washer to kick the back end of the arm further away from the bolt head. I believe the correct solution is to use a countersunk screw and let the threads protrude through to the servo housing and safe tie the screw on that end.
I know this probably belongs in the A/P section, but it is RV-10 specific.

Anyone else see this as an issue?



__________________
Bill Peyton
RV-10 - 1125 hrs
N37CP
First Flight Oct 2012
Aviation Partners, LLC
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2011, 06:07 AM
Wayne Gillispie Wayne Gillispie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,499
Default

Mine has approx 3/32" clearance. We could build a little ramp using epoxy flox
and that would prevent it from catching. It also may be possible to use a truss head screw with sl nut. Contact trutrak to see what the possibilities are.

Inspect that little cable for fraying at every annual. If it breaks you could possibly limit your control movement.
__________________
Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-31-2011, 06:20 AM
Bill.Peyton's Avatar
Bill.Peyton Bill.Peyton is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,788
Default

This whole arrangement looks like a poor design to me. You are correct in that if the cable breaks you have a seroius issue with pitch lock up. I don't understand the decision to go to this arrangement verses the roll servo actuator arm. I am going to go with a truss head screw and and locking hardware at the other side. I will give them a call today to discuss.
__________________
Bill Peyton
RV-10 - 1125 hrs
N37CP
First Flight Oct 2012
Aviation Partners, LLC

Last edited by Bill.Peyton : 09-06-2011 at 07:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-31-2011, 07:32 AM
Phil's Avatar
Phil Phil is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Waco, Texas
Posts: 1,658
Default

Let us know what you find out.

I had the same thought about the bolt head when I assembled mine. I don't think it will be an issue. But I'm game for changing it if there is a way to fully remove any possibility of a hang-up.

Phil
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-31-2011, 07:58 AM
rleffler's Avatar
rleffler rleffler is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Delaware, OH (KDLZ)
Posts: 4,196
Default

Bill,

Have you talked with Lucas at Trutrak?

You may want to post the question on their forum.

bob
__________________
Bob Leffler
N410BL - RV10 Flying
http://mykitlog.com/rleffler
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-31-2011, 11:43 AM
TrutrakTech TrutrakTech is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Springdale, AR
Posts: 547
Default

A truss head screw with a lock nut is perfectly acceptable. The lateral motion of the torque enhancer body is negligible so there should be no danger of it interfering with that bolt. However, the nice thing about Experimentals is you can do it how it makes YOU comfortable.

Our first iteration of the RV10 pitch servo we DID use the standard arm just like the roll servo. However, we found that it lacked sufficient torque to control the airplane satisfactorily. That left a few options. One was to use a larger stepper motor, but the larger motor has a pretty big increase in residual torque. We could use our high torque servo which would be more than sufficient, but at considerable cost to the customer.

The other option was to use our torque enhancer. This allows the C size servo motor to exert greater force on the controls through the mechanical advantage of a capstan wheel.

I hope this helps.
__________________
Trutrak Tech Support
trutrakap.com
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-31-2011, 12:16 PM
Wayne Gillispie Wayne Gillispie is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,499
Default

With quick responses like this and also over on vbulletin I am glad I chose TT AP. Thank you.
__________________
Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-31-2011, 06:22 PM
dmaib's Avatar
dmaib dmaib is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Smyrna Beach, FL
Posts: 1,339
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wayne Gillispie View Post
With quick responses like this and also over on vbulletin I am glad I chose TT AP. Thank you.
I've got around 400 hours on my TT AP and absolutely love it. It is one of the nicest autopilots I have ever used(and I have used more than a few), and customer support is superb.
__________________
David Maib
RV-10 N380DM
New Smyrna Beach, FL
VAF Paid 1/21/2020

"In '69 I was 21, and I called the road my own"
Jackson Browne





Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-31-2011, 09:07 PM
Bill.Peyton's Avatar
Bill.Peyton Bill.Peyton is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,788
Default

I spoke with Lucas today in regards to both the bolt interference issue and the limit stop on the roll servo. I agreed to send him some photos of the mod to the roll servo bracket that provides a more secure method of attaching the limit bracket. The concern here is an overcenter position if the autopilot were to drive the servo past the hard limits, which are only held on by a couple of #6 screws with minimal thread engagement. The second issue is the top rear bolt head possibly preventing the actuator arm from moving towards the aft position. I am using an 10-32X1.25" screw and locking it down with a nylock nut on the oposite side of the servo.
My biggest concern was pointed out by Wayne, and is the possibility that wire rope comes loose from the force multiplier arm and limits the pitch travel. Lucas mentioned that they had only seen this once and the had rectified the issue by using a different method of attachment at each end of the cable. Non the less, I personally still have a concern, but don't have any ideas how to resolve except lot's of inspection attention.
I am looking forward to flying behind this A/P, I too have heard nothing but good reviews on the product and the technical support.

Below a photo of the "fix" I used for the roll servo limit plate.
__________________
Bill Peyton
RV-10 - 1125 hrs
N37CP
First Flight Oct 2012
Aviation Partners, LLC

Last edited by Bill.Peyton : 09-04-2011 at 08:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-03-2011, 03:38 PM
murphmoose murphmoose is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 15
Default

Just out of curiosity...why an 8-32 screw. Isn't the original bolt that goes through there 10-32? And with 1 1/8 length, does that give you a good length on the back side to tighten the nut down?

Thanks
Steve

P.S. Does anyone know what the thickness is of the servo+the mounting plate it is attached to in that location?
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:08 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.