VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-26-2011, 07:23 AM
Walt's Avatar
Walt Walt is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dallas/Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 5,686
Default FSDO says Experimentals don't need Transponder checks, no IFR, Must have TSO equipmnt

I applied for a repair station certificate 6 months ago and after just 2 meetings recently with the local FAA FSDO I was basically thrown out of the office.

Things were going ok until I brought up experimental aircraft and how I expected them to be a large part of my clientele. After that things rapidly deteriorated until they finally said they were cancelling my application do to my challenging them on the regs and not complying with their requests. Some of "regs" according to them are:

1) Experimental aircraft do not need 91.411 or 91.413 certification
2) Repair stations cannot perform 91.411 or 91.413 checks on experimental aircraft.
3) Experimental aircraft cannot fly in controlled airspace.
4) Experimental aircraft cannot fly IFR.
5) Experimental aircraft must have TSO equipment.
6) You will not allowed test any non TSO equipment.
6) You must certify aircraft per 91.205 if you do a 91.411 check.

I have a meeting scheduled with the FSDO manager to discuss further but anticipate this will probably not fix things as I "assume" he will support his PAI who told me all this baloney. I am currently seeking advice from groups like AEA and EAA to help resolve. If anyone has any suggestions or contacts that may be able to help I would appreciate your forwarding me that info.
__________________
Walt Aronow, DFW, TX (52F)

EXP Aircraft Services LLC
Specializing in RV Condition Inspections, Maintenance, Avionics Upgrades
Dynamic Prop Balancing, Pitot-Static Altmeter/Transponder Certification
FAA Certified Repair Station, AP/IA/FCC GROL, EAA Technical Counselor
Authorized Garmin G3X Dealer/Installer
RV7A built 2004, 1700+ hrs, New Titan IO-370, Bendix Mags
Website: ExpAircraft.com, Email: walt@expaircraft.com, Cell: 972-746-5154

Last edited by Walt : 02-26-2011 at 08:08 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-26-2011, 07:28 AM
LifeofReiley's Avatar
LifeofReiley LifeofReiley is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Round Rock, TX
Posts: 3,778
Default Oh My...

Where do they find these clowns? This lack of knowledge within the FAA FSDO office should be grounds for termination... Like that will ever happen. The FSDO guy I happen to be so lucky to get only screwed up my paperwork THREE times before my repairman cert was delivered, and I even told him in advance that his information was wrong. I finally contacted Oklahoma, done right in 3-4 days.
__________________
Reiley
Retired N622DR - Serial #V7A1467
VAF# 671
Repeat Offender / Race 007
Friend of the RV-1

Last edited by LifeofReiley : 02-26-2011 at 07:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-26-2011, 07:33 AM
RV6_flyer's Avatar
RV6_flyer RV6_flyer is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: NC25
Posts: 3,507
Default

You are heading down the correct path elevating to the supervisor / manager.

EAA Randy Hansen and Joe Norris can also help with contacts. Joe knows the regulations inside out.

IMHO, we need to get the FAA involved to FIRE the individual inspector that does not know the regulations.


See PM for email address for Randy and Joe.
__________________
Gary A. Sobek
NC25 RV-6
Flying
3,400+ hours
Where is N157GS
Building RV-8 S/N: 80012

To most people, the sky is the limit.
To those who love aviation, the sky is home.

Last edited by RV6_flyer : 02-26-2011 at 07:35 AM. Reason: added PM for email addresses
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-26-2011, 08:29 AM
hydroguy2's Avatar
hydroguy2 hydroguy2 is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Townsend, Montana
Posts: 3,179
Default

Dang, I didn't realize my FSDO jerk got transferred to Texas.

joking aside, best of luck to you getting this resolved. and I agree contact Joe Norris EAA, he helped me a bunch. I'll PM you his contact info.
__________________
Retired Dam guy. Life is good.
Brian, N155BKsold but bought back.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-26-2011, 08:40 AM
8CW 8CW is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 317
Default

What Gary and Reiley suggested will probably yield results. However, if all else fails, you can always enlist the help of an aviation friendly representative or senator.
__________________
Bill Settle
RV-8 N38CW (Reserved)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-26-2011, 08:42 AM
JonJay's Avatar
JonJay JonJay is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Battleground
Posts: 4,348
Default And we pay for these guys!

I recently met with our local FSDO in an ill fated effort to grease the tracks for my AP testing. He insisted that experimental aircraft construction hours where not useable. After much discussion he was nice enough to look through the regs and, low and behold, it specifically states that they are useable.
He said to bring my paper work, repairmans certificate and other documentation in and whomever was on the RED Line that day would be the judge. Evidently the inspectors rotate through each day and the RED Line is the person for that day who gets all of the GA calls.
They really seem to hate GA and specifically Experimental GA. They seem to go out of their way to discourage us rather than help us.
__________________
Smart People do Stupid things all the time. I know, I've seen me do'em.

RV6 - Builder/Flying
Bucker Jungmann
Fiat G.46 -(restoration in progress, if I have enough life left in me)
RV1 - Proud Pilot.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-26-2011, 01:48 PM
Daver Daver is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 297
Default good fsdo

My recent experience with the local FSDO was good.

In inspecting my plane (saving me about $500 for a DAR), they were thorough and helpful.

They spotted a few things that needed fixing and after they were fixed, I got my special airworthiness certificate.

Last week I got my repairman certificate.

I guess I got lucky....

Dave
-9A
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-26-2011, 02:03 PM
DonFromTX's Avatar
DonFromTX DonFromTX is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: La Feria Texas
Posts: 3,822
Default

My last experience with a FSDO was very good as well, friendly, cooperative, willing to help. Of course he is also my baby brother so was probably afraid I would beat him up!

.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daver View Post
My recent experience with the local FSDO was good.

In inspecting my plane (saving me about $500 for a DAR), they were thorough and helpful.

They spotted a few things that needed fixing and after they were fixed, I got my special airworthiness certificate.

Last week I got my repairman certificate.

I guess I got lucky....

Dave
-9A
__________________
A&P, PP-SEL, Pathological Flier, EAA Technical Counselor
EAA Chapter 595 President,http://www.595.eaachapter.org/index.htm
Retired US Army Officer
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-26-2011, 02:11 PM
Jack Tyler Jack Tyler is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 219
Default

"...whomever was on the RED Line that day would be the judge. Evidently the inspectors rotate through each day and the RED Line is the person for that day who gets all of the GA calls."

I have limited but recent experience with a S Florida FSDO (multiple booth visits while at the Sebring Expo in Jan) and the above statement lines up nicely with what I saw. Four fellows had 'booth duty' and each was uncomfortably put in the position of trying to answer my Q's - inaccurately - simply because of the dynamics involved: they wore the ID's and official shirts, and no doubt felt responsible for being the expert info source on whomever showed up/whatever topic came up. As my pushbacks persisted, they eventually volunteered the fact that only one of them was knowledgeable about Experimental a/c and he would be returning to the booth at X hours. Sure enough, he was very knowledgeable and had sensible, direct A's to my Q's...but that wouldn't have been the outcome if I was at their office and being 'helped' by the duty FSDO rep.

Rather than looking at this is grounds for firing any FSDO employee who doesn't know soup to nuts about Experimentals, I look at it as a very normal circumstance in any large organization, where information is often compartmentalized. My sense is that we just have to winnow our way into/thru the FSDO tactically to find the right guy(s)...and if none of them are there, then work up the chain of command.

Walt: Re: useful resources you might consider tapping, I'd suggest you might also consider chatting with one of the technical counselors at AOPA. They may have some helpful insights on this scenario; I've been impressed with the Experimental-related info I've picked up there (unlike some of their on-line webpage references).

Good luck to you.

Jack
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-26-2011, 05:59 PM
Christopher Murphy Christopher Murphy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: colorado
Posts: 873
Default fsdo

They should have an inspector generals office! I can't count how many BS things I have had to do to satisfy some Inspector Dork.
ie. go through 10 years of log entries and cross out the word "part"
even though the FSDO example of the log entry contained the word "part"
( inspector at an airshow don't comply/don't fly.)
Requests for air race waivers that get lost over and over again until you send it registered mail and then it gets lost in the office.

Years ago the POI for the state patrol flight dept. made them take brand new c-182s and change the panel from the standard T to some sutpid arangement that he thought was the way it should be.

Its the government... were here to help...not.

CM
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:54 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.