|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

01-23-2011, 03:16 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 15
|
|
How does an RV compare to a turbine T-34?
So I'm looking forward to getting back to SoCal and bribing my way into an RV for a ride, but until then I have a general sort of question. I am a 1000+ hour pilot, so some might say I have a pretty good experience base. Trouble is, about 850 of those hours have been in airplanes with wings that spin around my head. Good practice for comms, navigation, and headwork, but not necessarily too helpful for fixed wing stick and rudder skills.
I'm planning to buy or build early next year, and I'm wondering how difficult to fly these things really are. I keep reading how slippery they are, and how it's easy to get behind them. I've recently gotten refresher training in Pipers and Cessnas, but those don't really compare.
Does anyone here have any T-34C experience? I'm wondering how the RV-6/7/8 would compare. I got about 95 hours in the Tormentor in Navy Primary flight training, so I figure that is probably my best frame of reference. If I remember, we flew patterns about 100KIAS, and full flap landings were 85KIAS. I believe this landing speed is higher than the RV's??
I'm leaning toward a taildragger, so obviously that will require some specialized training, but overall I'm just wondering how pattern work will compare to my turbine T-34 time. Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
Case
|

01-23-2011, 04:05 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 639
|
|
Case,
I'm a fellow Navy helo bubba, just came from T-34 land down in Corpus as an IP and I have an RV-7 with roughly 800hrs on it, so I can answer your question.
When I started flying the -7, I had a couple thousand hours, but like you, most of that was navy helo time. However, I had no trouble transitioning to the -7. I got the transition training from Alex Dedominicis in his RV-6 and 1.5hrs with him in my -7, and then that was it. Very easy plane to fly and land. I initially took it easy with respect to crosswinds, but as I built experience and confidence, I flew in increasing crosswinds. The -7's rudder is so big that I feel most crosswinds are a non event. Just fly the plane.
As for the comparision with the T-34C, I think the 34 is a little easier than the RV. The -34 being built like a truck was more forgiving of bad landings, especially with the oleo struts. Control wise, the -34 is much heavier, RV's are very light on the controls. Speed range down low is about the same. My -7 will indicate 180kts wide open on the deck. The -34 will indicate between 190-200 kts on the deck. At altitude my 7 can still true at 180kts, but the T-34 will true 220 or even higher. Of course the -34 Vne is 280kts and the -7 is only 200kts.
If you want my opinion, go for it. I recommend either the -7 or -8.
__________________
RV-7 Flying since 2004
1,100 hrs+
|

01-23-2011, 04:07 PM
|
 |
Senior Curmudgeon
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,420
|
|
I suspect you will like the fuel burn of the RV a little better. 
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909
Rv-10, N210LM.
Flying as of 12/4/2010
Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011 
Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.
"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
|

01-23-2011, 04:10 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Broomfield, CO
Posts: 639
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike S
I suspect you will like the fuel burn of the RV a little better. 
|
Oh yeah, forgot to mention that. The -34 burns between 40-50gph. My -7 will cruise 170 KTAS @ 8.5gph.
__________________
RV-7 Flying since 2004
1,100 hrs+
|

01-23-2011, 05:19 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 15
|
|
Tobin,
Couldn't have ordered up a more pertinent reply. Thanks for taking the time to answer. I spent most of 2010 on a GSA in Qatar, and somehow the civilian flying bug set in when I got back. Maybe I caught something in the desert.
I've been looking at all kinds of aircraft, from Bonanzas to Glasairs, but I keep coming back to the RVs. My wife isn't interested in looking at the back of my head, so I'm thinking an RV-7 is going to fit the bill. As of now, I think I'll buy one flying to see what I like or don't like, then either update the panel and interior in a few years, or start from scratch with a new build. Hope Norfolk treats you well. (and yes Mike, I am definitely looking forward to 10 gal per hour vice the 135 gal/hour my 60B drinks!)
Case
|

01-23-2011, 06:08 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: KRTS
Posts: 1,798
|
|
The RV is way easier to fly than the Turbowiener. All the constant trim inputs on the wiener were a result of having way more power/torque than the original design was made to handle. If you had no problem flying that POS an RV is going to be a breeze. Speeds are comparable as was mentioned, but a little slower in the pattern. Operating cost is going to be a little better in the RV though. Plus you don't have to worry about ripping the wings off at 4 G's. Although flying 60's you may start going grey in the break!
__________________
Next?, TBD
IAR-823, SOLD
RV-8, SOLD
RV-7, SOLD
Last edited by Sig600 : 01-23-2011 at 06:13 PM.
|

01-23-2011, 06:13 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Smyrna Beach, FL
Posts: 1,339
|
|
No T-34 experience, but plenty of helicopter experience. You have nothing to worry about with the taildragger. Helo guys are pretty adept at using their feet to keep the nose pointed the right way! 
__________________
David Maib
RV-10 N380DM
New Smyrna Beach, FL
VAF Paid 1/21/2020
"In '69 I was 21, and I called the road my own"
Jackson Browne
|

01-24-2011, 01:14 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 2,125
|
|
Case,
My 64 hours in a T-34C were a couple (ahem) years ago, but you'll have no problem. Some thoughts:
Speeds are somewhat similar, maybe a bit slower in an RV (not much)... but RVs fly a great Navy pattern...it will come naturally to you.
Wing loading and weight make the 34 ride perhaps a little smoother in bumps, but the RV is more responsive to control inputs. Fun ride!
Acro is not too dissimilar...again, the more stable ride in the 34 makes things easy and smooth, but RV acro is straight forward, as the airplane has great control harmony...doesn't take excessive rudder finesse like some planes do...very fun ride!
TW will come to ya, just get some good transition training, and you'll wonder what the fuss was about. TW or NG...both fun rides!
The hum of a PT-6 is smoother than the sound of a Lyc (but a little noise is a good thing!  ).
Overall, your Mentor time will cross over well, and you'll be sporting a "grin" in no time. I also say Go 4 It!!
Have fun!
Cheers,
Bob
|

01-24-2011, 05:25 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Louisville, Ga
Posts: 7,840
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by rvmills
Case,
........The hum of a PT-6 is smoother than the sound of a Lyc (but a little noise is a good thing!  ).
Have fun!
Cheers,
Bob
|
.....until you have to fork over the price of a good, used RV for a gearbox overhaul
Best,
__________________
Pierre Smith
RV-10, 510 TT
RV6A (Sojourner) 180 HP, Catto 3 Bl (502Hrs), gone...and already missed
Air Tractor AT 502B PT 6-15 Sold
Air Tractor 402 PT-6-20 Sold
EAA Flight Advisor/CFI/Tech Counselor
Louisville, Ga
It's never skill or craftsmanship that completes airplanes, it's the will to do so,
Patrick Kenny, EAA 275132
Dues gladly paid!
|

01-24-2011, 08:24 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,652
|
|
Bubba,
I have no T-34 time, and only 18 minutes at the controls of a Jetranger, but I do know lots of current and ex-military pilots, so my opinion: As a trained military pilot, you will have ZERO difficulty staying ahead of any RV (or Rocket, for that matter). As a helicopter pilot, you should also have ZERO trouble with any taildragger RV. Where you (may) have some trouble is in an area I see over and over with the "pure" military pilots - that is in the area of managing a piston engine properly. Compared to the "set it and forget it" operation of a turbine (speaking as a military trained jet engine technician), the three handed juggling of levers/knobs on a piston engine are going to require some re-training. Leaning on the ground, LOP, proper warm up, shock cooling, on the fly trouble shooting, hot starts, etc... all are much different than you may be used to.
If you are an old hand at piston engines, then please disregard.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.
Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:38 AM.
|