VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-8/8A
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-19-2010, 07:20 AM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,500
Default

FWIW, I've also witnessed an RV6 started without wings, no problem at all, shake or otherwise. Of course the owner was smart enough to tie it to a truck......

That said, I don't recommend it for the reason John mentioned; you don't want to unpickle until time to start flying.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-19-2010, 09:55 AM
aerhed aerhed is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Big Sandy, WY
Posts: 2,567
Default

Guys around here do it all the time. We call them snowplanes. My buddy has the one Sparky Imeson's dad built with a C-85. Real fast, real spooky.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-27-2010, 09:38 AM
jcbarker jcbarker is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 133
Default Proof of an -8 started without wings

No big deal. Like Dan said, no shake. Probably didn't need the side tie downs but it was easy to do. Good chalks under the wheels and you'll notice we tied the tail to a tractor! As you can see, the airplane was done. So it didn't have a chance to sit around long before it was flying.



Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-27-2010, 04:31 PM
Junglepilot's Avatar
Junglepilot Junglepilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Auburn, AL
Posts: 189
Default No problem if you take precautions

When I was overseas with MAF, we had a Cessna 180 that had it's wings off for extended maintenance that we did not want to have corrosion start in the engine. So we ran it every week.

We took a spare/used oil external oil sump from another 180 (which held about two gallons if I remember) and mounted it securely to the right wing root, ran the proper hose and with fittings into the header.

We then pulled it out to an adjacent field next to our main hangar, tied the tail wheel to two in ground heavy duty tie-downs, set the yoke to full up elevator, set brakes and chocked the wheels with oversized, metal chocks.

Next had a man stand buy with a large halon extinguisher.

We ran it this way each week for about 5 months until it was back in service. The engine went to TBO and no surprises.

Just use common sense. That video with the Lancair is indeed sad but that one leg look tweaked when the video started. I believe there's more to that story than the 10 seconds of shakey footage show.
__________________
Sandy Toomer
Commercial, Instrument, A&P
EAA: 1023750
Based Lanett, AL (7A3)

Auburn, AL
WAR EAGLE!

Last edited by Junglepilot : 03-27-2010 at 04:34 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-27-2010, 08:22 PM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Smile The other problem...

...may be blowing your neighbors roses away....

One S. Cal builder showed how this could be done... and another started his engine in a small enclosed back yard, and didn't warn his wife, who was p***d off that all of the back yard dirt blew into her kitchen....

Those large propellers do create a lot of "wind"....
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-04-2011, 03:29 AM
Andy Hill's Avatar
Andy Hill Andy Hill is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 976
Default

Whilst building the RV-3 fuselage, it suddenly struck me there was a discontinuity in major longerons in the lower fuselage between the main and rear wing spars...

It made me go back to the plans and check I had not omitted something... and then realised, no I had not, the "load" path is provided by the wing structure itself.

If you do choose to run the engine without the wings bolted on, think through how the "box" rigidity of the fuselage (in twist) is compromised by no wing box, and also the straight line path from engne to tail (i.e. tying the tailwheel down does not really help since there is a structure "gap" between the wing spars). Trying to quantify these elements is nigh on impossible - the only people qualifed to answer are Vans, and we know their opinion on the matter

Andy
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-04-2011, 05:23 AM
WenEng WenEng is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 522
Default An RV10 no wing engine startup. No problem.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0LgG6J8UyPE&NR=1

That being said, I will still wait for my wing attachment before running mine the 1st time. A couple years ago I wanted to start it sitting on an modified engine stand w/o prop. But, back then I was considerably more ignorant than now..... Now, I'm only slightly ignorant... big improvement thanks to VAF...
__________________
Wendell VAF#1832
RV-6A 3/4 done...N48JE Reserved
Build site: www.mykitlog.com/weneng
Donated to VAF in 2020
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-04-2011, 06:12 AM
Ironflight's Avatar
Ironflight Ironflight is offline
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,256
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy Hill View Post
Whilst building the RV-3 fuselage, it suddenly struck me there was a discontinuity in major longerons in the lower fuselage between the main and rear wing spars...

It made me go back to the plans and check I had not omitted something... and then realised, no I had not, the "load" path is provided by the wing structure itself.

If you do choose to run the engine without the wings bolted on, think through how the "box" rigidity of the fuselage (in twist) is compromised by no wing box, and also the straight line path from engne to tail (i.e. tying the tailwheel down does not really help since there is a structure "gap" between the wing spars). Trying to quantify these elements is nigh on impossible - the only people qualifed to answer are Vans, and we know their opinion on the matter

Andy
It really is amazing what we are learning by actually BUILDING our aircraft structures, isn't it Andy? The load paths are much more understandable when you put them togteher....

Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-04-2011, 10:39 PM
Bill Wightman's Avatar
Bill Wightman Bill Wightman is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: OKC, OK
Posts: 687
Default RV8 Driveway Run

Ran up my RV8 / 180 CS sans wings without issue. *However* there could have been problems stemming from a couple areas.

Video Link:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHQfhOiyKQM

Tail shake: Mine didn't seem to have a real issue with tail shake, but I couldn't have known that at the time. Its since been brought to my attention that the wings do provide a good amount of mass damping to the fuselage and will help to reduce tail shake during startup/shutdown.

The wings also contribute a good bit of weight to the tail so the plane is considerably lighter on the tail without wings. My solution to that was to tie the tailwheel spring to the rear axle of a Chevy 1500. But that still wouldn't prevent it lifting up a couple feet with enough thrust up front.

Second: the torque impulse reacted by the landing gear looked worse on video than it felt in the cockpit. In the video, you can see both gear legs flexing a fair bit as the engine stumbled to life out of a slightly flooded state. To me, it didn't feel or look unstable or apt to tip over but the torque reaction, being entirely reacted by the gear & fuselage inertia, was somewhat more than I was accustomed to.

Y'all can draw your own conclusions. I for one didn't have any problems. But, the wings definitely do contribute additional mass stability to the airplane so if you feel like you need that, then by all means put them on. I personally have no fear of a tip-over so long as the airplane is secured to something that won't move, as was evident in the video. Structurally, I see no reason the wings need to be on for a simple ground run, other than their mass damping effect. They definitely do not add stiffness to the fuselage. The spar carry-through section is stiff transversely, but that stiffness isn't critical for this kind of operation.
__________________
?The important thing in aeroplanes is that they shall be speedy.?
- Baron Manfred von Richthofen


RV8 under construction
RV4 - Sold

United B777 FO, Chicago
Aero Engineer
RV8

Last edited by Bill Wightman : 01-04-2011 at 10:49 PM. Reason: I originally posted this in the RV12 section. Copied it here.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-05-2011, 11:01 AM
kentb's Avatar
kentb kentb is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Canby, Oregon
Posts: 1,786
Default I didn't start mine until the day before the first test flight.

I didn't avoid the early start up because of structural reasons, although it looks like that should be considered.

The reasoning used for the delay about starting the engine are as follows:

I try to fly my plane once a week. If for some reason I can fly for a month, I start getting concerned about not doing the best for my engine. If you keep the oil moving on a regular basis your engine will last longer.

My engine was shipped to me with preservative oil in it and was setting in my hangar, on a pallet and then on the plane for more then one year. Before starting the engine the oil needs to be drained and fresh oil put in.

After the first start the engine is in the non preserved state and the clock starts ticking. Now the pressure is on to get it in the air and I don't like being under pressure to complete the build. At the end stage of the project you need to take your time and make sure everything is right.

Kent
__________________
Kent Byerley
RV9A N94KJ - IO320, CS, tipup
AFS 3500, TT AP, FLYING....
Canby, Or
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:23 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.