|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

06-22-2010, 05:11 PM
|
 |
VAF Moderator / Line Boy
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dayton, NV
Posts: 12,243
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by garrys
Why is it that different pilots report such widely varying experiences with XM? That absolutely shouldn't be the case. Something screwy is going on, and I don't think ANY of us know the whole story.
As far at the XM communication being "one way", I don't think so. If I haven't paid my monthly subscription, they turn me off, which means they send out a discreet signal to each and every unique subscribere ID. Same thing when they "refresh" the service......they send out a refresh signal to my Unique ID.
|
Well.....this IS the internet, and the fact is, on the 'net, you primarily hear about the problems that people have - you don't get the 95% of the people that have never had a problem logging on to say "I didn't have a problem today!" So you have to keep that in perspective. If it makes you feel better, I have only had my XM drop out once or twice in over four years of CONSTANT flying and use.
As for the one-way, this was described a few posts back. It takes just a slight amount of cleverness to design a radio that needs to get "pinged" every once in awhile in order to work. I don't believe it has any kind of transmitter - it's just a receiver that needs to get a code to get activated, and can also receiver a code to be de-activated (it's still receiving all the time, it just refuses to give you any data. It can be built with a "watchdog timer" that forces it to deactivate itself if it doesn't hear an appropriate code every so often. I'm not saying that I know specifically how it works, I am just saying that the logic to design it this way is not that hard to engineer.
Paul
__________________
Paul F. Dye
Editor at Large - KITPLANES Magazine
RV-8 - N188PD - "Valkyrie"
RV-6 (By Marriage) - N164MS - "Mikey"
RV-3B - N13PL - "Tsamsiyu"
A&P, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor
Dayton Valley Airpark (A34)
http://Ironflight.com
|

06-22-2010, 05:50 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Newport, TN
Posts: 7,496
|
|
It is still "one way"... From them to your receiver...
Quote:
Originally Posted by garrys
As far at the XM communication being "one way", I don't think so. If I haven't paid my monthly subscription, they turn me off, which means they send out a discreet signal to each and every unique subscribere ID. Same thing when they "refresh" the service......they send out a refresh signal to my Unique ID.
|
|

06-22-2010, 06:00 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 207
|
|
XM Satellite Weather Woes
I had an intermitten problem with my 396 Garmin receiver. I moingved the antenna, thought I had a conflict with my other GPS, finally I turned off my I Phone. It seems to be the solution to the problem. My IPhone has a gps receiver and so it makes sense that the two my conflict. I will continue to monitor the situation but I would try it.
STeve Anderson
RV 7A Flying
Lafayette, La.
130 hoiurs
|

06-23-2010, 07:26 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 377
|
|
I've heard the same...but
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve A
I had an intermitten problem with my 396 Garmin receiver. I moingved the antenna, thought I had a conflict with my other GPS, finally I turned off my I Phone. It seems to be the solution to the problem. My IPhone has a gps receiver and so it makes sense that the two my conflict. I will continue to monitor the situation but I would try it.
STeve Anderson
RV 7A Flying
Lafayette, La.
130 hoiurs
|
I asked XM tech support if a GPS receiver would interfere with the XM and I was told that I could put the antennas and receivers as close to one another as I wanted to. There is a lot of talk about XM/GPS interference on the net but XM tech support doesn't seem to agree. BTW, my GPS reciever/antenna and xm antenna are side by side (almost touching) and seem to work fine. I just do the refresh thing as a precaution. If I flew everyday I don't think it would be required.
__________________
Charlie "T.Bear" Guarino
Springtown, TX
RV-4 Flying again with a fresh overhaul
Exempt but paid
|

06-23-2010, 08:53 PM
|
 |
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 752
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by garrys
Several of my pilot friends have been noticing degraded performance from their XM Satellite Weather systems...
Garry Stout, Tampa FL RV7A
|
What I've noticed is how the yearly fee keeps degrading too  . I got my renewal notice a few weeks ago and the Aviator Lite subscription has gone from $360/yr to $420.  Considering how seldom I use it, I've got to believe I can get the info cheaper off a cell phone. This is likely to be my last year using XM weather.
Despite my infrequent use, I have never noticed any interruption in service. For $420/yr why would they risk cutting someone off from a prepaid subscription? That's marketing suicide.
Correction 6/26/10: With taxes it came to $454.56 for the Aviator Lite annual subscription.
Chris
__________________
Chris Pratt (2020 VAF DUES PAID)
RV-8 Flying, 850+hours
N898DK
Lycoming O-360-A1A, Hartzell CS
52F (Northwest Regional, Aero Valley, Whatever, TX)
Last edited by chrispratt : 06-26-2010 at 08:03 PM.
Reason: Update data
|

06-24-2010, 02:18 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 97
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironflight
I don't believe it has any kind of transmitter - it's just a receiver that needs to get a code to get activated, and can also receiver a code to be de-activated (it's still receiving all the time, it just refuses to give you any data.
|
There's an analogy here with satellite based subscription television. The dish receives every channel, the receiver can decode every channel, but I can't watch every channel. But I can call up the provider and subscribe to a new channel, even with the landline modem built into the receiver unplugged - in other words, the "activation" is delivered via satellite. There is a portion of bandwidth explicitly set aside for this purpose.
A while back, we investigated the possibility of using XM to multicast tracking data *back* to aircraft in a secure and selective manner based on the same principles. As I recall from those discussions, Paul, you are exactly correct.
__________________
Chris Hinch
Dunedin, New Zealand
False start on RV8 in 1998, starting over 2010.
Last edited by chinch : 06-24-2010 at 02:23 AM.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 PM.
|