VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-13-2010, 07:43 PM
bizjet bizjet is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: DFW America
Posts: 20
Default Why VOR, or LOC, or GS?

I wonder why anyone installs VOR, or LOC receivers on their aircraft. GPS is a legal substitute for all but Localizer navigation. Even if an approach says "ADF required", it's not - if you have GPS and a data base. Same with VOR and airway navigation. I understand localizer if you need 200 1/2 landing minumums, but otherwise, why bother? Just curious.

I haven't flown a raw ADF bearing, or VOR radial in years. Still do lots of ILS's, but that's it. The equipment available for experimental aircraft is truly state of the art and I wonder why anyone would use old stuff.

Regards,

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-13-2010, 08:01 PM
Paul Thomas Paul Thomas is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 483
Default

If the GPS fails, it's nice to have backups. If I'm putting a LOC, which is a requirement for me in an IFR airplane (I love ILS's), it gives me VOR capabilities
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-13-2010, 08:12 PM
Jamie's Avatar
Jamie Jamie is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 2,295
Default

You make a good point and something that I've thought a lot about. I installed one because I want ILS capability and a backup to GPS. There are severals posts here on VAF where people tell the story of losing GPS signals on multiple GPS receivers due to DoD turning on selective availability of the signal -- especially out west when they are performing "war games".
__________________
"What kind of man would live where there is no daring? I don't believe in taking foolish chances but nothing can be accomplished without taking any chance at all." - Charles A. Lindbergh
Jamie | RV-7A First Flight: 7/27/2007 (Sold)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-13-2010, 08:23 PM
sglynn's Avatar
sglynn sglynn is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Anacortes, WA
Posts: 823
Default not exactly

Check the AIM, but last time I did GPS was not named for VOR to VOR enroute. GPS is ok on an overlay for VOR approach. It is explicitly omited from the list for enroute on the airways. Reason, because they need error on the airways. GPS is just to accurate. Of course you can always go direct. But can you? Not around Class Bravo. If you transition Class B, chances are they will put you on an airway. Also to get your IFR ticket you need to shoot three approaches. GPS is one, ILS, and LOC I suppose would do. But a GPS gives you more fun. Another reason for a VOR is when you call 122.0 for weather, they like you to give your position realitive to a VOR. I suppose this is note written by a guy who learned on ADF and GPS. I'll bet I'm not convincing any GPS pilots. And maybe it doesn't matter because a Garmin 430 gives you legal IFR, plus a nav receiver. This one box gives you 5 approaches. wow 1) GPS, 2) ILS, 3) VOR, 4) Loc, 5) ADF (overlay)
__________________
Steve Lynn
RV-7A
Flying Phase I
Anacortes, WA
www.mykitlog.com/sglynn

Last edited by sglynn : 02-13-2010 at 08:26 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-13-2010, 08:24 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paul Thomas View Post
If the GPS fails, it's nice to have backups. If I'm putting a LOC, which is a requirement for me in an IFR airplane (I love ILS's), it gives me VOR capabilities
I have this bad habit , of asking a large number of pilots, including everyday commercial pilots............just how often their GPS has failed. In reality, it's very seldom and only of short duration. Of course, there will be always be a few who have suffered longer failures but it's few and far between. In regards to GA airplanes, I can safely say that it's antenna problems more than anything else. Out of five aviation GPS's I've owned since the early ninties when GPS came on line for civilian use, I've only suffered one major outage, and that was a long time ago.

A good friend who fly's 737-800's for Delta has only had one momentary outage in the eight years he's flown them. And that was close to a restricted military area.

There you have it from my point of view. I'm a GPS fanatic, and could care less when VOR stations for flying point A to B are decommissioned. My backup is a second GPS, and if I get that hard up, I have a hand-held nav-com in the flight bag. Needless to say, my airplane is not IFR equipped, but I would like it to be someday.

To me, setting up VOR's to fly from point to point, is only something to repel boredom. Unfortunately, it means your head has to be in the cockpit, rather than scanning. Same for whiz wheels and triangulating positions on a sectional.

L.Adamson --- RV6A/ Garmin 696
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-13-2010, 08:26 PM
L.Adamson's Avatar
L.Adamson L.Adamson is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: KSLC
Posts: 4,021
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamie View Post
You make a good point and something that I've thought a lot about. I installed one because I want ILS capability and a backup to GPS. There are severals posts here on VAF where people tell the story of losing GPS signals on multiple GPS receivers due to DoD turning on selective availability of the signal -- especially out west when they are performing "war games".
I've heard that too. But then I fly out west, and am always around these military areas. It's been far too many years since my GPS has lost it's signal.

L.Adamson --- RV6A
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-13-2010, 08:34 PM
Auburntsts's Avatar
Auburntsts Auburntsts is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,861
Default

Mainly because I want a 430W and it comes as part of the navigator. I could just get a 420 (This has been discussed before in the GPS forum), but the cost difference is minor so there's no reason not to spring for the full-up 430 and get VOR/LOC/GS capability.
__________________
Todd "I drink and know things" Stovall
PP ASEL-IA
RV-10 N728TT - Flying!
WAR EAGLE!

Last edited by Auburntsts : 02-13-2010 at 08:44 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-13-2010, 08:40 PM
Bob Axsom Bob Axsom is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5,685
Default Well enjoy it if you got it

I don't have it, can't afford it and probably will not get it in the near future. VOR/LOC/GS work and I have them and use them - does that bother you an awfully lot? I'm sorry about that - NOT!

Bob Axsom
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-13-2010, 08:47 PM
Paul Thomas Paul Thomas is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 483
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by L.Adamson View Post
I have this bad habit , of asking a large number of pilots, including everyday commercial pilots............just how often their GPS has failed. In reality, it's very seldom and only of short duration. Of course, there will be always be a few who have suffered longer failures but it's few and far between. In regards to GA airplanes, I can safely say that it's antenna problems more than anything else. Out of five aviation GPS's I've owned since the early ninties when GPS came on line for civilian use, I've only suffered one major outage, and that was a long time ago.

A good friend who fly's 737-800's for Delta has only had one momentary outage in the eight years he's flown them. And that was close to a restricted military area.

There you have it from my point of view. I'm a GPS fanatic, and could care less when VOR stations for flying point A to B are decommissioned. My backup is a second GPS, and if I get that hard up, I have a hand-held nav-com in the flight bag. Needless to say, my airplane is not IFR equipped, but I would like it to be someday.

To me, setting up VOR's to fly from point to point, is only something to repel boredom. Unfortunately, it means your head has to be in the cockpit, rather than scanning. Same for whiz wheels and triangulating positions on a sectional.

L.Adamson --- RV6A/ Garmin 696
I've had a GPS failure and it lasted over an hour. I was the only plane in the area affected and only during that flight. The GPS had good satellite reception but, if I blindly followed it, I would have been making circles over the everglades. The scary part is this is in a certified bird with a certified IFR install... I was a green pilot and the lesson has stuck with me. While I most often go GPS direct, I ready to navigate without it anytime.

I'm putting it down as an anomaly being in the bermuda triangle (I've seen other weirder stuff), and my failure would be thrown out by someone doing a statistical analysis but it taught me a valuable lesson.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-13-2010, 08:57 PM
apkp777's Avatar
apkp777 apkp777 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 2,053
Default

Cheaper to install a VOR/LOC/GS than an approach/en route certified GPS. File /U but fly /G
__________________
Tony Phillips
N524AP, RV 9 (tail wheel)
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:23 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.