Ballistic Rescue System information request

[Jim "Sierra X-ray"]

I was wondering if the RV 12 will have a ballistic rescue system available in the future or is this something that we have to develop ourselves.

There is no doubt that the ballistic rescue system will safe life's so I would really like to fined out more.

Jim "Sierra X-ray"
Larissa, Greece

[pierre smith]

Cirrus owners have pulled the red handle around a dozen times now and yes, lives were saved but some of them were because of flying VFR into IMC and the pilot's fault.

Aren't the -12's going to be VFR airplanes only?

I seriously doubt whether Van would spend the time, money or energy to develop a ballistic recovery system.

I have a friend with a Cirrus and this year, his tenth, (and every tenth year) will spend $10,000 on a mandatory system refresher.

Best,

[RScott]

BRS advertises that they have saved X number of lives, but that's just advertising and really represents the number of chutes deployed and the people in those planes.

In many cases, the people would have survived with injuries ranging from none to critical. There is no way to know how many lives they have saved.

Having a BRS system may have given some pilots the confidence to take on weather they shouldn't have, leading them to deploy the chute.

And even having the system is no guarantee you won't die. A few years ago a couple guys took off in their Cirrus at night and plowed into a mountain.

When you look at their advertising, keep those factors in mind. I'm not saying the system is worthless; just be aware of the limitations.

[6S4 Hugo]

Originally Posted by RScott

In many cases, the people would have survived with injuries ranging from none to critical. There is no way to know how many lives they have saved.

I remember seeing this video and thinking that a BRS might be a good idea. You can see and hear the cable from the tow plane hitting the aircraft and the engine failing. I would call this a definite save.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXQKaxp6Rlk

[rocketbob]

There was one case locally where a pilot took off with his family and became incapacitated (heart attack.) His son was in the right seat, son's girlfriend was in back. The son was not a pilot and so they pulled the chute and ended up in a retention pond in a subdivision. The pilot died but the other two ended up ok.

Most of the time, though, they get pulled when the pilot becomes disoriented. Cirrus' whole marketing campaign is targeted to non-pilots.

[Jamie]

Originally Posted by 6S4 Hugo

I remember seeing this video and thinking that a BRS might be a good idea. You can see and hear the cable from the tow plane hitting the aircraft and the engine failing. I would call this a definite save.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JXQKaxp6Rlk

Although I can see lots of value in BRS (i.e. pilot becomes incapacitated, loss of controls, etc), this is a typical example of BRS claiming a save when it really wasn't a save.

This guy was over lots of suitable landing areas, including the runway that is right under him! I hate second-guessing peoples' actions in emergency situations (I'm not), but I also hate BRS and Cirrus claiming a save every time someone pulls the red handle.

[the_other_dougreeves]

The value of BRS has been debated a lot here and elsewhere. As someone who has one in their airplane, my criteria of when to pull the "jiffy pop" handle is a forced landing that is likely to cause significant injury to the occupants or people on the ground. Examples of this include:

* Structural failure that results in loss of control or insufficient control to land the airplane.
* Midair that results in structural failure or injuries to the occupants such that a landing without serious injury is not possible.
* Engine failure over hostile terrain, including highly urbanized areas without sufficient room for safe landing without risk of serious injury to people on the ground.
* Pilot incapacitation.

It's up to each builder / purchaser to decide if these are important to them.

TODR

[SHIPCHIEF]

I found a testimonial story interesting in that he was going to descend into an oil refinery, so he started the engine and used the rudder to tug the plane and deployed chute away from the refinery. Kind of a down hill only powered chute?

[Jamie]

Originally Posted by SHIPCHIEF

I found a testimonial story interesting in that he was going to descend into an oil refinery, so he started the engine and used the rudder to tug the plane and deployed chute away from the refinery. Kind of a down hill only powered chute?

Yes, I read the same story. That man was seriously injured when he landed in water (if I remember correctly it was a broken back). He also went flying that day knowing that he had been blacking out. He pulled the chute because he blacked out in IMC and he was afraid of blacking out again.

[Kevin Horton]

Cirrus did a lot of testing of the BRS, so you know the basic design is good. But, if someone designs a BRS installation for an aircraft, and never actually tests it, how do you know whether the design is correct?

The prototype Sling LSA was lost in an accident a week ago. They were doing spin testing, and the aircraft entered an unrecoverable spin. The pilot attempted to deploy the BRS, but it failed to deploy due to a design problem with the installation. The pilot and observer egressed the aircraft and came down under their personal emergency parachutes. Details on ANN.

Bottom line - a BRS installation may be no more than a placebo unless it has been fully tested. And I really doubt that any individual is prepared to do multiple BRS deployments to test it. Adding a BRS to make your wife feel better about flying in the aircraft is one thing. But never take any credit for the BRS when you are making any go/no go decisions, or deciding on a course of action in flight.