|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

07-07-2008, 08:05 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Benton Mn
Posts: 3
|
|
Turbo charger for o-300
Hello Everyone
Don't kick me off, I'm here from the POA board and I was doing a web search for turbo chargers for a o-300 Cont. with a wastegate and the search brought me to this forum......you must be the "Good Guys" eh.
Anyway is there anyone here that can point me in the correct direction. I have a 1957 C-172 with a o-300 that could use a little help on the high den alt days.
Thanks
Willie
|

07-07-2008, 08:15 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 5,745
|
|
If the aircraft is in the experimental category, I could help you match something up. If not, you'd have to see if anyone has an STC for this combo.
|

07-07-2008, 08:37 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
|
|
Willie,
Welcome to the VAF!
The straight tail 172's are great airplanes, light and simple.
You might be better off with an O-360 STC for that bird. It will be simpler and possibly more reliable. I know, the O-300 is a very smooth running six cylinder but it is long out of production so parts are hard to come by and should you turbo-charge it, you will be buying parts.
Just my $.02
Oh, and the O-360, engine mount, etc. might cost less than a turbo.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Last edited by N941WR : 07-07-2008 at 08:43 PM.
|

07-08-2008, 07:20 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Pasadena CA
Posts: 2,484
|
|
Yep, the 180 lycoming with a Constant speed prop should be what you are looking for. To the best of my knowledge no STC exsists for your application.
__________________
Stephen Samuelian, CFII, A&P IA, CTO
RV4 wing in Jig @ KPOC
RV7 emp built
|

07-08-2008, 09:35 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Benton Mn
Posts: 3
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by N941WR
Willie,
Welcome to the VAF!
The straight tail 172's are great airplanes, light and simple.
You might be better off with an O-360 STC for that bird. It will be simpler and possibly more reliable. I know, the O-300 is a very smooth running six cylinder but it is long out of production so parts are hard to come by and should you turbo-charge it, you will be buying parts.
Just my $.02
Oh, and the O-360, engine mount, etc. might cost less than a turbo.
|
Would you be talking about the Continental IO-360KB or the Lycoming 360? Where would I head to get more info? Some people don't like handing out info unless your buying. I like to gather as much as possible b/4 I decide what to do and then make the purchase. My o-300 still runs strong and hope it will for awhile yet, but it does have 1650 hours on it so if I start to look now I won't be in a rush. I'm 6'3 260lbs and my son (taking lessons) is 6'5 250 lbs.....that doesn't leave a whole lot for mom and her stuff.
|

07-08-2008, 10:53 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 145
|
|
I'm sure there's one out there somewhere, but I'm not aware of any O-300 turbo installations, certainly never one from Continental itself. (Again, someone may find a drone or tank engine in the dark mists of TCM R&D, but I doubt it.) Just look at the lack of fins, and recall how hot the exhaust valves tend to run in this engine and the O-200.
There are really just two good options, I think: Do the Lycoming installation, which is available under and STC, or trade for a 180 or 182.
Marc
|

07-09-2008, 05:33 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Lake Benton Mn
Posts: 3
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by lcnmrv8r
I fly a 57 also. I've looked at what you're wanting to do and couldn't justify it. The 180 hp conversion makes a great bird(especially when you move the little wheel from the front to the back during the conversion  ) but it's expensive. Lycoming O-360, mount, cowling, accessories, prop, stc, etc...
I'm pretty sure there's no stc for a turbo.
I would seriously look at selling it, taking the money it would take to upgrade, and buy a plane that fits the mission(180,182).
Just thinking out loud but considering fuel burn and some other factors you could probably buy another 172 and still come out saving money. Just a thought.
BTW, what do you consider high density altitude??
|
No way will I sell it.....it's a classic....I guess if I have a need for speed I'll have to do what you guys are doing and start working on a RV.
We have a 2100' grass strip at home and the other day the HDA was @4700' which compared to NM I'm sure that's not much, our elev is 1735' so it was somewhat of a change.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:37 PM.
|