VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > RV Firewall Forward Section > Propellers
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-30-2007, 09:58 PM
Andy_RR Andy_RR is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 426
Default Counterweighted, inverted oil system or both?

When I was doing my skills test for my Australian PPL conversion, my examiner did his best to distract me by talking about RV's once he discovered I was planning to build one. One of his comments was that if I was planning on doing any aerobatics with a CS prop, make sure I fitted a counterweighted version to prevent revving the **** off the engine when inverted.

Now, it seems that this is due to oil pressure loss due to starvation, so does an inverted oil system (Christen, Raven etc) solve this problem or is counterweighting still required.

My aim is for moderate aerobatic capability for sunday afternoons, but not hard core competition, for which the RV probably isn't the best choice.

Any thoughts from the VAF collective?

Cheers,

Andrew
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2007, 04:38 AM
Kahuna's Avatar
Kahuna Kahuna is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Gold Hill, NC25
Posts: 2,398
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy_RR View Post

My aim is for moderate aerobatic capability for sunday afternoons, but not hard core competition, for which the RV probably isn't the best choice.

Any thoughts from the VAF collective?

Cheers,

Andrew
With this goal state then you need neither. Generally the first thing to go is the fuel. Meaning if your carb'd, then you will loose fuel (engine quits) before oil and before prop. Either way, none of this is required for Sunday joy ride acro.
__________________
Kahuna
6A, S8 ,
Facebook, Track Me
Gold Hill, NC25
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2007, 08:58 AM
Norman CYYJ Norman CYYJ is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Victoria B.C.
Posts: 1,265
Default

Stay with positive 'G' manouvers and you won't need anything fancy. No oil loss and no fuel starvation. Go minus 'G' engine quits and when you land you will have a major belly washing to do.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-31-2007, 09:23 AM
asav8tor asav8tor is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Seattle, wa
Posts: 679
Default

Are you sure he didn't say (or meant to say) "do not get a counter weighted" engine?

Counter weighted crank can be detuned with rapid throttle movements (not the kind of acro an RV should be doing anyway). This can cause crankshaft cracking and other problems.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2007, 06:16 PM
Russ McCutcheon's Avatar
Russ McCutcheon Russ McCutcheon is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Vancouver, WA USA
Posts: 908
Default

No they did mean a counter weighted CS prop, with this type of prop it goes to course pitch when you lose oil pressure rather then going to fine pitch with a non weighted prop. With that said I have a standard MTV-15-B CS prop and a Christen oil system, if and when I do on occasion lose oil psi it never goes very high, my tack records the highest RPM during the flight and the take off rpm is always the highest rpm. I just do acro at cruse power and 2400 rpm and only lose psi if the balls in the valve have not been worked for a wile and I don?t give it a quick bump inverted the first time, once there free than you never lose psi it does fluctuate but not enough to affect the prop. I?m only speaking for the MT prop and the christen system, also a Woodward governor (YMMV).

Russ
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-31-2007, 09:14 PM
Andy_RR Andy_RR is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 426
Default Thanks Russ!

Russ, that's the answer to my question! Thanks.

I did mean counterweighted prop. If you look on the Whirlwind website, you will see that their aerobatic 200C and 400C props are counterweighted, but they are also between 9lb and 37lb heavier than their non-counterweighted bretheren - not that all of this weight would be the counterweighting.

I know you don't 'need' any of this for simple aerobatics, but you could live with a carb-fed O-320 and a FP prop too... (if you know what I mean)

A
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-01-2007, 08:31 AM
RVjim's Avatar
RVjim RVjim is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Southern California
Posts: 196
Default counterweighted blade

From what I have heard, loss of oil pressure most commonly occurs in zero G maneuvers. And for the inverted oil valve mounted flat on the firewall, a vertical climb would create the same condition. (The inverted oil valve ball doesn?t know where to go for the oil pickup.)

The standard blade CS propeller will go to low pitch (high RPM) with the loss of oil pressure. This can easily over speed the engine and propeller.
The counterweighted blade CS propeller will go to high pitch (low RPM) with the loss of oil pressure. The will cause the engine RPM to decrease.

Also, in the event of an engine failure, the counterweighted blade CS propeller has 2/3 of the drag of a CS propeller in flat pitch. This isn?t too far off from feathered blades that have 7/8 of the drag of a flat pitch CS propeller.

Regards,
Jim Ayers
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-01-2007, 10:50 AM
frankh's Avatar
frankh frankh is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Corvallis Oregon
Posts: 3,547
Default In practice

with an IO360 parrallel valve and a Raven invert system I have never lost oil pressure to the prop and have pointed thing straight up several times and of course fly inverted.

I do have a friend who did starve the prop in competion aerobatics doing knife edge passes (not in an RV)

I can see how this might happen but the knife edge's are boring anyway so I don't bother with 'em.

Oh remember when doing a hammerhead to leave the power ON until AFTER you have rotated...A few weeks back I decided to see just how slow I could let the speed drop before rotating.

Unfortunatly I also pulled the power while pointing upwards.

Can we say "suspended animation"..Hold the stick firm and small deflections for the subsequent tail slide...

Not a big deal (as long as you don't let go) but certainly an odd feeling!

Frank
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:32 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.