Quote:
Originally Posted by pecanflyboy
Parellel valve, IO-360, 10:1, EIS, CS prop, James cowl, vernatherm removed, by-pass valve, oil to cooler controlled with ball valve. The SW 8406 puts me at 225F low altitude in Texas, this time of the year. I've seen it get close to 240F high altitude Colorado this time of year. If I cruise rich of peak, my oil temp will climb above 200F at 10,000'. LOP it will cool to 180-190F. I've done most of the stuff suggested on the forums. If I can squeeze a bigger cooler on the baffle, I'll be good in the summer time.
|
Got it. I asked because, in general, the angle valve motors reject more heat through the oil. That said, a parallel valve with piston squirters will also need more heat rejection capacity.
Here is comparative data from the trusty S&W catalog, all at 6" H2O air deltaP across the fins, 55 lbs of oil flow per minute, and 100 deltaT:
8406 (single pass)
325 BTU
oil pressure drop 5.5 psi
8432 (dual pass)
400 BTU
oil pressure drop 16 psi
10599 (single pass)
375 BTU (aprox)
oil pressure drop 4.25 psi
The 8432 and the 10599 are identical size cores. The primary difference is single vs dual pass, with different hose connection locations. Obviously the dual pass cooler has a little better heat transfer.
The 8432's large deltaP across the oil side means pump pressure will hold the viscosity valve open longer during warm up, bypassing the cooler even with the ball valve open. It may raise the piston when hot. I don't know.