VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31  
Old 06-22-2020, 09:02 PM
RV8JD's Avatar
RV8JD RV8JD is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rv8ch View Post
I'll bet you a nickel there is at least one FAAer on VAF that could probably work with the EAA to get this done. I hope he or she raises their hand!
I hope somebody with some pull will.

Back in early 2017 I sent the following note to both the AOPA and the EAA. AOPA responded quickly that they sent my note on to their government affairs office. Haven't heard anything since from the AOPA. I did not get any response from the EAA. I guess they both have bigger, more glamorous fish to fry.
Dear EAA and AOPA,

"I am a member of both organizations. As you know, there is only one approved VHF frequency that can be used for general air-to-air usage for airplanes (122.75 MHz). This frequency can get quite congested, with pilots using it while flying together and also by pilots reporting their position (in the blind) in local training areas. With the increasing number of pilots that fly together and would like to talk to each other, and larger number of local training areas being designated and used, there is a great need for more frequencies. As you are aware, to avoid the congestion on 122.75, many airplane pilots use frequencies that have been allocated for other uses, and cause problems for the legitimate users of those frequencies.

I would like to request that both organizations begin lobbying the FCC and the FAA for more general use air-to-air frequencies for airplane pilots to use

Sincerely,

Carl N."

__________________
Carl N.
Arlington, WA (KAWO)
RV-8, 790 Tach Hours
(Pic 1),(Pic 2)
- Out with the Old, In with the New
(Pic)
RV-8, 1938 Tach Hours (Pic 1),(Pic 2) - Sold

Glasflugel Standard Libelle 201B - Sold
Rolladen-Schneider LS1-f - No longer owned

Last edited by RV8JD : 06-22-2020 at 09:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 06-24-2020, 12:00 PM
HAL Pilot's Avatar
HAL Pilot HAL Pilot is online now
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Las Vegas NV
Posts: 146
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Paule View Post
With the 8.33 spacing, there are a lot of owners who not only would need to replace their com radios, they probably just got done paying for ADS-B.

What do we have to do - add about $1,000 per plane to the yearly budget just for mandatory equipment upgrades?

C'mon, folks.... let's not add to our unnecessary burdens.

Dave
David

The idea was to assign current .25 freqs the big guys use to 8.33 and free up .25 freq or three for GA.


:-)
__________________
Pete

RV14A Tail kit build mostly done
Wing kit in progress
RV 14 WIKI in process, residing on Drop Box

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/xu5p6f4l7...bU0ck0pJa?dl=0

change dot org link http://chng.it/KBPtXZYD

---For Edit Access drop me a PM with your Email address.
EAA 1300
Donation Paid 2018,19,20 Military exempt but paid any way Cause its worth it.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 06-24-2020, 04:12 PM
gmcjetpilot's Avatar
gmcjetpilot gmcjetpilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 4,283
Default

I used 121.500 Mhz, seems to always be quiet... kidding. Freqs are congested World wide and why the current 760 channels is insufficient. The 8.33 Khz spacing is to address this and if at FL195 or above you will need it. Even unicom or multicom can be crowded. For air to air 122.75 and 123.45 Mhz are the ones I use. I never had an issue.

What is the #1 FCC rule for transmitting on any frequency? #1 FCC rule thou shall not cause interference.
__________________
George
Raleigh, NC Area
RV-4, RV-7, ATP, CFII, MEI, 737/757/767

2020 Dues Paid

Last edited by gmcjetpilot : 06-24-2020 at 04:22 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 06-24-2020, 09:25 PM
Christopher Murphy Christopher Murphy is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: colorado
Posts: 872
Default Quiet...not really

We almost always monitor ?guard ? and if you fly high enough you will hear an amazing amount of unicom and traffic pattern calls on 121.5. Also common is the call to ramp control or operations. Of course you have the virtuous ? guard police? who must key up and correct the person transmitting on guard even though most likely the offender is listening on another freq.

Cm
__________________
RV-4 "Mr. Twister"
Pitts S1S "Mexican Red" sold and missed
Mr. Twister Airshows
Rocky Mountain Renegades
the mission... have fun.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 06-25-2020, 08:16 AM
airguy's Avatar
airguy airguy is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Garden City, Tx
Posts: 5,120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher Murphy View Post
We almost always monitor ?guard ? and if you fly high enough you will hear an amazing amount of unicom and traffic pattern calls on 121.5. Also common is the call to ramp control or operations. Of course you have the virtuous ? guard police? who must key up and correct the person transmitting on guard even though most likely the offender is listening on another freq.

Cm
And the occasional "meow". Lately that seems to be the new hot thing.
__________________
Greg Niehues - SEL, IFR, Repairman Cert.
Garden City, TX VAF 2020 dues paid
N16GN flying 700 hrs and counting; IO360, SDS, WWRV200, Dynon HDX, 430W
Built an off-plan RV9A with too much fuel and too much HP. Should drop dead any minute now.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 06-25-2020, 11:53 AM
jbDC9 jbDC9 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 866
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by airguy View Post
And the occasional "meow". Lately that seems to be the new hot thing.
Not really, the meowing and other BS on guard has been going on for years; it's so bad that pretty much anywhere east of the Mississippi River I usually don't monitor guard anymore, just too much stupidity on there.
__________________
John Bixby
RV-8 QB sn 82030 - 1750 hrs
O-360-A1D/CS/Pmags
Houston, TX
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-25-2020, 01:09 PM
GalinHdz's Avatar
GalinHdz GalinHdz is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: KSGJ / TJBQ
Posts: 2,034
Default

FWIW: Here in the U.S. 123.450 has been an assigned frequency since the early 1930's. Back then it was actually assigned to Boeing for flight testing in the run up to WWII. It is an international air to air frequency but unauthorized here in the US so 123.450 is a definite NO-NO!

Besides 122.750, 122.850 is assigned for airplane air to air comms. For air to air instruction coordination, 123.300 and 123.500 are assigned. Other assigned VHF-AM frequencies include 123.025 for helicopter and balloon air to air coordination while the Forestry, Fire, CAP and FWS have 123.100 assigned.

You can find a fairly accurate Aviation RF Spectrum Frequency Assignments on this webpage.

__________________
Galin
CP-ASEL-AMEL-IR
FCC Radiotelephone (PG) with Radar Endorsement
2020 Donation made
www.PuertoRicoFlyer.com

Last edited by GalinHdz : 06-25-2020 at 01:27 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-25-2020, 06:32 PM
RV8JD's Avatar
RV8JD RV8JD is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GalinHdz View Post
For air to air instruction coordination, 123.300 and 123.500 are assigned.
123.300 and 123.500 are designated for "Aviation instruction, Glider, Hot Air Balloon (not to be used for advisory service)."

Per the AIM, Section 4-1-11, TBL 4-1-3, "Other Frequency Usage Designated by FCC", here:
https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publ...section_1.html
Gilders (air-to-air) and flight schools seem to keep those frequencies busy.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GalinHdz View Post
Besides 122.750, 122.850 is assigned for airplane air to air comms.
I don't believe that 122.850 is an air-to-air frequency. It is designated as "Aviation Multicom" and the FCC defines "Aviation Multicom" as:
https://www.fcc.gov/wireless/bureau-...round-stations
"Aeronautical multicom stations provide communications between private aircraft and a ground facility for temporary, seasonal, or emergency activities like crop dusting, livestock herding, forest firefighting, aerial advertising, parachute jumping, etc. In some cases, multicom stations may be authorized to serve as unicom stations."
__________________
Carl N.
Arlington, WA (KAWO)
RV-8, 790 Tach Hours
(Pic 1),(Pic 2)
- Out with the Old, In with the New
(Pic)
RV-8, 1938 Tach Hours (Pic 1),(Pic 2) - Sold

Glasflugel Standard Libelle 201B - Sold
Rolladen-Schneider LS1-f - No longer owned

Last edited by RV8JD : 06-25-2020 at 09:49 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-26-2020, 04:36 AM
ronschreck's Avatar
ronschreck ronschreck is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,627
Default HELP!

I was the Contest Director for the 2019 IAC U.S. National Aerobatic Championships, held in Salina, Kansas. We needed two dedicated frequencies, one for use in the aerobatic box and another for glider operations. I asked our IAC government liaison chairman if there was any chance of getting the FAA or FCC to assign us some frequencies. He told me there was no way to do that and the best course of action would be to randomly select two frequencies and hope for the best! (That's what is done at all regional aerobatic competitions all the time.) So I set out with the determination to knowingly and willingly break the law and pirate a couple of frequencies! I scoured every data base I could find to determine what frequencies were in use within 150 miles of Salina by the FAA and other government and non-government entities and came up with two frequencies, 129.925 for the box and 129.75 for glider operations. I live for the day when someone fixes this situation and finds a way to legally secure frequencies for aerobatic contests, air shows (yes they do just as I did), air-to-air formation flying and maybe even a RV-to-RV communications. I am otherwise a law abiding citizen and I live in fear of the knock on the door. Somebody please find a way to fix this!
__________________
Ron Schreck
IAC National Judge
RV-8, "Miss Izzy", 2250 Hours - Sold
VAF 2021 Donor
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-26-2020, 06:14 AM
Thermos's Avatar
Thermos Thermos is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: KASH
Posts: 496
Default

Ron,

I've lived your spectrum pain most of my USAF military/civilian engineering career. Getting any frequency assignment, let alone one in the VHF AM Air band, requires hugely bureaucratic organizations - FAA, FCC and sometimes NTIA - to communicate and coordinate. And spectrum management is hugely political in addition to being hugely bureaucratic, so you can do the math.

The good news is that the FCC is too busy doing other things (like issuing licenses for systems that interfere with GPS) to monitor 24/7 all EM spectrum in the US. I'm not saying that it's ok to operate without a frequency authorization, it's just that your events are small, temporary disturbances in the VHF spectrum. If you do your best to clear a frequency before an event and no one complains about interference with their legally-assigned frequency, you're not super likely to get a cease-and-desist letter.

Hope this eases your fear of the MiB knocking on your door.

Dave
__________________
Dave Setser
RV-7 airworthy!
Nashua, NH (KASH)
Putting the "slow" in slow-build since 2004!

Last edited by Thermos : 06-26-2020 at 06:38 AM. Reason: Because I wanted to
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:54 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.