VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #61  
Old 05-30-2020, 07:32 AM
BJohnson's Avatar
BJohnson BJohnson is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Federal Way, Wa
Posts: 264
Default Imprints

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHarris View Post
Mojave River Landing
From the imprints in the sand it looks like the back wheels came off the ground and landed off to the side of the main track. The spinner, prop blades and air scoop all left an imprint in the sand.

Great job landing the airplane in the soft field! It is encouraging to see an upright off field landing of an -A model. How short was the landing rollout?
__________________
Brice
RV-9A 90897 FLYING
Reply With Quote
  #62  
Old 05-30-2020, 08:20 AM
rv8ch's Avatar
rv8ch rv8ch is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: LSGY
Posts: 3,173
Default Observant dude!

Quote:
Originally Posted by BJohnson View Post
From the imprints in the sand it looks like the back wheels came off the ground and landed off to the side of the main track. The spinner, prop blades and air scoop all left an imprint in the sand. ...
Brice, very observant. I had not noticed that. I'm guessing that this must have been quite a ride. David is either very good or very lucky or both!
__________________
Mickey Coggins
http://rv8.ch
"Hello, world!"
Reply With Quote
  #63  
Old 05-30-2020, 08:23 AM
PilotjohnS PilotjohnS is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Southwest
Posts: 1,108
Default Engine tear down

Is it time for an engine tear down and inspection since prop hit the sand?
__________________
John S

WARNING! Information presented in this post is my opinion. All users of info have sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for their use.

Dues paid 2020, worth every penny

RV9A- Status:
Tail 98% done
Wings 98% done
Fuselage Kit 98% done
Finishing Kit 35% canopy done for now
Electrical 5% in work
Firewall Forward 5% in work
www.pilotjohnsrv9.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #64  
Old 05-30-2020, 12:00 PM
ronschreck's Avatar
ronschreck ronschreck is online now
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,627
Default In summation.....

I'll give you a D- in wiring skills, a B+ in problem solving, an F in forum decorum and an A+ in soft field landing techniques. A good learning experience all around.
__________________
Ron Schreck
IAC National Judge
RV-8, "Miss Izzy", 2250 Hours - Sold
VAF 2021 Donor
Reply With Quote
  #65  
Old 05-30-2020, 12:12 PM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walt View Post
All aircraft without a dual buss/dual battery system have a single point of failure. I'm pretty sure the documentation does not require or suggest dual electrical busses if installing 2 Pmags, as most other EI systems recommend.

I might add that this is not the first time I've heard of lost power to Pmags causing the eng to quit after landing or on final.
Walt,

No, the P-mags do not need a dual buss because they will operate independently in the event of an electrical failure.

The problem here is the OP turned off the P-mags and didn't realize it until he was on the ground. Had he not touched the P-lead, or turned it back on, the engine would have started up after he lowered the nose and his RPM's came back up.

That is the beauty of the P-mags, if installed correctly, as described in the manual, there wouldn't have been an issue.

This isn't the first time I have heard of people wiring them incorrectly. This is always a surprise to me as this is a critical system and yet builders continue to go against the advice listed in the installation manual.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html

Last edited by N941WR : 05-30-2020 at 02:12 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #66  
Old 05-30-2020, 11:01 PM
rv6n6r's Avatar
rv6n6r rv6n6r is offline
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Gearhart Oregon
Posts: 232
Default

Haha I loved the puzzler. And what an amazing story about a forced landing with a very good ending. It was amazing to see that nosewheel plowed into the sand without a noseover.

Sure, I was a little frustrated like others to think I'd be waiting a week for the answer, but jeez not mad about it or anything. Hey we're a community here, and anyway who didn't love Click and Clack and their weekly puzzler?

I am inspired by this as I have had some puzzlers over the 20 + years flying my RV-6; I'll maybe post them in upcoming days. Nothing so dramatic as an engine-out landing in the desert, but still. And I'll be sure to have the answers right at hand - David learnt that lesson for me
__________________
Randall Henderson
RV-6 / O-360 / CS, 1500+ hrs, 1st flight Sept. 1999
Airport committee chairman & ASNV for Seaside, OR Municipal (56S), www.seasideairport.org
Donated August 2020
Reply With Quote
  #67  
Old 05-30-2020, 11:15 PM
Hitt7A Hitt7A is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Mount Vernon WA
Posts: 23
Default

I can see both sides of the lesson here. But at the end of the day it?s all about learning, and in my book the op gets an a+ for both the landing and the learning. Are we not all intrigued by the cause ? And we will all remember the lesson by being intrigued. Thank you for both
Reply With Quote
  #68  
Old 05-31-2020, 12:47 AM
Captain Avgas Captain Avgas is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,865
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidHarris View Post

I shut everything off and made a forced landing on the sandy bed of the dry Mojave River. Fortunately I landed into a good headwind, the sand was firmer than usual because of recent rains, and I held the stick full back, so the nosewheel didn't touch until I had come to an almost complete stop. The aircraft was undamaged.

David
David, your very interesting story has prompted much worthwhile discussion and debate about the merits (or not) of the PMag. Beyond that, what seems to be fascinating posters is how you managed to land a nosegear RV in such soft sand without buckling the nose gear and tipping over. I, like everyone else, am absolutely amazed how deep that nosegear is in the sand. I am imagining that if you had your nose gear fairing on the added resistance in that sand might have produced a different outcome.

Can you please provide more detailed information on your landing, particularly the last seconds. Did the tail rise up and threaten to go over. Did the main wheels come off the ground. Did the prop strike the ground. And finally, as asked by some-one else, were there witness marks on the nose gear indicating that the AntiSplat brace had come into play.
__________________
You’re only as good as your last landing
Bob Barrow
RV7A
Reply With Quote
  #69  
Old 05-31-2020, 06:37 AM
JordanGrant's Avatar
JordanGrant JordanGrant is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 324
Default Good post

David,
Good post, thanks for sharing, and I liked the puzzler.

As to forum practices and decorum, to be honest I'm kind of disappointed in the tone of some of the responses here. The worst thing this community can do is fuss at someone for both being creative and posting their choices/mistakes for all to read. It is always a risk to the ego to share things like this, and I think many of the respondents should have been more polite to David. Being aggressive is not going to inspire more compliance to your version of how the forum should go - it's just going to keep people from bothering to take the time to write at all and then we'll all miss the chance to learn. Please be careful about that, and be thankful to David for choosing to share his experience.
__________________
Jordan Grant
RV-6 N198G
Monthly donation started Mar '20
Reply With Quote
  #70  
Old 05-31-2020, 09:39 AM
N402RH's Avatar
N402RH N402RH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 704
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by N941WR View Post
Walt,

No, the P-mags do not need a dual buss because they will operate independently in the event of an electrical failure.

The problem here is the OP turned off the P-mags and didn't realize it until he was on the ground. Had he not touched the P-lead, or turned it back on, the engine would have started up after he lowered the nose and his RPM's came back up.

That is the beauty of the P-mags, if installed correctly, as described in the manual, there wouldn't have been an issue.

This isn't the first time I have heard of people wiring them incorrectly. This is always a surprise to me as this is a critical system and yet builders continue to go against the advice listed in the installation manual.
I do not believe this is correct. The P-Lead (kill switch) was wired to a standard aircraft key switch, as long as the key switch was in the both position the P-Mags should have worked with enough RPM. You are always going to have multiple single points of failure when they are wired like the P-Mag manual. If any of the following components fail you would have the same result: Master Relay, Master Relay control wire, any of the ring terminals in the control wire wiring, Master Switch, Master switch ground wires.

Rob Hickman
N402RH RV-10
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.