VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #11  
Old 05-28-2020, 07:44 AM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pilot135pd View Post
I thought I read here on the forum that the -7 and -8 wing were the same but it shows here the -8 is a foot shorter. Still looks like the best plane performing overall though
The difference in wingspan is due to the narrower fuselage of the -8.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-28-2020, 07:47 AM
jnorris's Avatar
jnorris jnorris is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oshkosh
Posts: 208
Default

Very cool, and very interesting. Thanks for putting this together!
__________________
Cheers!

Joe
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-28-2020, 07:52 AM
N941WR's Avatar
N941WR N941WR is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SC
Posts: 12,887
Default

The comparison I like to do, and don't see on your chart is to "normalize" the data, meaning for the -3, -4, -7, -8, and -9, list the numbers all with an (I)O-320 160 hp engine.

As I was looking at the Van's site last night, I noticed the -4's numbers were produced with a fixed pitch wood prop. Whereas the -7, -8, and -9's were all produced with Hartzell two bladed CS propellers. While this may not impact cruise speed and max speed, it will impact climb rate and takeoff distances.
__________________
Bill R.
RV-9 (Yes, it's a dragon tail)
O-360 w/ dual P-mags
Build the plane you want, not the plane others want you to build!
SC86 - Easley, SC
www.repucci.com/bill/baf.html
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-28-2020, 08:17 AM
BCP Boys's Avatar
BCP Boys BCP Boys is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Kennesaw, Ga
Posts: 824
Default

I noticed you have 200 for the engine on the RV-7s. Is this more common than the 180 for the -7s? Just wondering, not trying to correct you or question your sheet, just wondering if there are more RV7s out there with a 200 hp than ones with 180. I have a -7 with a 180, and flew it for 5 years with a wood prop that gave me great cruise speed but not so great take off power. After replacing it with a C/S prop, I was delighted to get most of the HP on take off and felt like I was flying a different airplane (one way more Bad A__ ). Now I'm thinking to myself, "Self, you are missing out on 20 to 30 more horses"
__________________
Amir
----------
RV-7
RV-10 - Sold

Supporting VAF since the first visit
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-28-2020, 08:25 AM
David Paule David Paule is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 4,428
Default

RV-3 max baggage weight is 50 pounds.

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-28-2020, 08:49 AM
RONSIM's Avatar
RONSIM RONSIM is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Largo, FL
Posts: 1,027
Default Useful load vs Payload

In this context, gross weight minus empty weight is useful load -- payload is useful load minus fuel weight/extras.

Ron
__________________
RV-10 Co-built, maintained, flown (sold)
RV-8A Maintained and flown (Sold)
RV-6A Bought and Flying (N177RV), upgrades $$$
IO360, 180HP/CS, AFS 5600T, D10A, G650, G430, G327, ADS-B, VIZ385 AP
Very Happy Contributor
Comm, SMEL, CFII, A&P
Based at KCLW (Clearwater, FL)
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-28-2020, 09:13 AM
Plummit's Avatar
Plummit Plummit is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Covid Country-SoCal
Posts: 1,081
Default

Interesting that there is no baggage weight listed for the -10.

-Marc
__________________
RV-10
N814RV
2020 Donation Made
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-29-2020, 08:14 AM
Steve Steve is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Roy, Utah
Posts: 1,141
Default

Per the factory, the baggage limit on the -9A is 100 lbs, W&B permitting.
__________________
Five Sierra Fox
RV-9A
Utah
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-29-2020, 08:29 AM
kaweeka kaweeka is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Roseville
Posts: 386
Default

I always thought the 9 was wider than the 6. Thanks for taking the time to post this. Very interesting.

David
__________________
RV-9A N435KR, Vans calendar March 2018
LIO 320 B1A, Dual LS Plasma III, AFP injection
G3x touch
Roseville, Ca
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-29-2020, 10:08 AM
Ralph Inkster Ralph Inkster is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 999
Default

Great work on the chart!
Interesting when illustrating features & performances of similar evolutionary models:
RV-4 --> RV-8 tandems
RV-6 --> RV-7 --> RV-14 SBS aerobatic
RV-9 <--> RV12 SBS non aerobatic (yes, their mission or evolution not the same but neat performance comparison)

Would be super neat if a similar chart could be produced to compare the top 5 Kit Brands out there in such detail.
__________________
Ralph
built a few RVs, rebuilt a few more, hot rodded some, & maintained/updated a bunch more

Last edited by Ralph Inkster : 05-29-2020 at 10:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:28 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.