VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > Safety
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-24-2017, 12:49 PM
lr172 lr172 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonJay View Post
I have never seen anything documented in the FARS, AC43, hardware manuals, or airframe manuals that state this. Not saying it doesn't make sense, but a "safety" device, devices, or techniques are well covered and this isn't one of them, or at least one that I can find.
If someone can dig up a reference please share.

Certainly not trying to be argumentative, but every time I think there is a logical solution to a perceived problem, there is something that I was not aware of that dashes it on the rocks.

A nut and lock washer has been the standard for eon's in this application for every type of carb, throttle body, injector, etc....
I believe, per Vic's original post, the problem isn't the hardware. It is the hardware not being properly installed and checked.
Sorry. I didn't mean to imply that it was an aviation standard and that others should use it. I was just throwing out another alternative for others to consider. Clearly, the accepted standard isn't working or being followed as inspectors are seeing this somewhat regularly.

It was my opinion that double nuts would work better than a star washer so I used it. Double nuts as a loosening prevention method goes back over a century, before we had lock washers. I thought I mentioned, but apparently didn't, that their use requires proper technique to be effective so this isn't the fix to the problem out there, which I would agree is an "installation issue."

http://www.boltscience.com/pages/twonuts.htm
__________________
N64LR - RV-6A / IO-320, Flying as of 8/2015
N11LR - RV-10, Flying as of 12/2019

Last edited by lr172 : 04-24-2017 at 12:53 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-24-2017, 01:13 PM
JonJay's Avatar
JonJay JonJay is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Battleground
Posts: 4,348
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lr172 View Post
Sorry. I didn't mean to imply that it was an aviation standard and that others should use it. I was just throwing out another alternative for others to consider. Clearly, the accepted standard isn't working or being followed as inspectors are seeing this somewhat regularly.

It was my opinion that double nuts would work better than a star washer so I used it. Double nuts as a loosening prevention method goes back over a century, before we had lock washers. I thought I mentioned, but apparently didn't, that their use requires proper technique to be effective so this isn't the fix to the problem out there, which I would agree is an "installation issue."

http://www.boltscience.com/pages/twonuts.htm
Great reference. Thank you.
__________________
Smart People do Stupid things all the time. I know, I've seen me do'em.

RV6 - Builder/Flying
Bucker Jungmann
Fiat G.46 -(restoration in progress, if I have enough life left in me)
RV1 - Proud Pilot.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-24-2017, 01:14 PM
jrs14855 jrs14855 is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Lake Havasu City AZ
Posts: 2,390
Default Double Nut

Some certified Pitts models use double nuts on the outboard end of flying wires, Plain nuts are also used as locking devices(jam nuts) on opposite end of flying wires and on various control rod end bearings.
I go back quite a while with both Continental and Lycoming powered aircraft. I have a distinct recollection of pal nuts on Continental but not on Lycoming. The big issue with double nut is whether the stud is long enough to adequately engage the second nut.
Of course none of this is really relevant on EAB, any reasonable locking method is acceptable. For example on the exhaust I use split stainless lock washers with no flat washer.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-28-2020, 07:45 AM
8 Builder 8 Builder is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Lowell, MA
Posts: 85
Default

This is very timely. Just yesterday, I called Airflow Performance to see what kind of bolt they prefer a builder to use when attaching my RV-8 snorkel to the throttle body of my FM-150. They didn't use anything that special due to the fact that the FM-150 is tapped for 1/4-20 bolts and the bolt can be torqued to spec without a nut on it. I went one step further and used a drilled-head hex head bolt,
MS20074-04-06. It's a 20 thread per inch "engine" bolt instead of the usual 28 thread per inch found on that size bolt. I was then able to safety wire the bolts.
__________________
Rich Snyder
Building RV-8
Superior IO-360
Garmin G3X Touch, VFR
Fixed Catto 3 blade
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 04-28-2020, 08:18 AM
jibby212 jibby212 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Sarasota Fl
Posts: 168
Default

I just mounted my carb a few days ago and was not happy with how easily the nuts would come off using the standard star lock washer. I ended up going to Lowes and getting some grade 8 split type lock washers, these give noticeably more resistance when removing and the spring tension remains even after you begin to loosen. If you think there is any negatives from using this type of lock washer, please voice your opinion.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 04-28-2020, 08:34 AM
rocketbob's Avatar
rocketbob rocketbob is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: 8I3
Posts: 3,562
Default

I have yet to have anything come loose using split grade 8 washers with a thin backing washer. I buy them by the pound at Tractor Supply. Wouldn't hurt to throw blue loctite on and maybe even a palnut.
__________________

Please don't PM me! Email only!

Bob Japundza CFI A&PIA
N9187P PA-24-260B Comanche, flying
N678X F1 Rocket, under const.
N244BJ RV-6 "victim of SNF tornado" 1200+ hrs, rebuilding
N8155F C150 flying
N7925P PA-24-250 Comanche, restoring
Not a thing I own is stock.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 04-30-2020, 05:27 AM
fixnflyguy fixnflyguy is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Winston-Salem, N.C.
Posts: 1,210
Default Carb nut caution..

It has been in earlier forums, and at least several RV's I know of, including mine, have had the carburetor attach nuts back off (even with lock washers) due to the engine torque and a very tight FAB snorkel set-up. If your installation is "new", make sure your flex joint at the cowl inlet is not too tight. The engine torque will turn the snorkel assembly into a breaker bar and loosen the carb nuts, resulting in leaning and backfire/idle problems initially, worse if left unchecked. I routinely reach in the inlet and look for play in the FAB. I also ran some safety wire around my carb studs to prevent the nuts from fully backing off in the event they loosen. The carb bowl screws/nuts are equally as vulnerable, even with the bent tab safety's.
__________________
Bill E.
RV-4/N76WE
8A7 / Advance NC
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 04-30-2020, 05:43 AM
snopercod's Avatar
snopercod snopercod is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,092
Default Nord Lock Washers?

Has anybody tried using Nord-Lock washers in this application?
__________________
(2020 dues paid)
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 04-30-2020, 08:20 AM
OZCleco's Avatar
OZCleco OZCleco is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Maylands, Western Australia
Posts: 58
Default

Unless I'm missing something the current Lyc parts catalogue from their website lists a plain washer (STD-35), plain nut (STD-1410) and palnut locknut (STD-1763) for the O-320 B & D.

Our engine had the lock-washer and plain nut configuration which seems to be what all new Lyc's leave the factory with. Do you reckon I could find a reference for that?

Installed a new carb on our O-320 with new lock washers and the original single plain nuts and never felt comfortable. Way too much rattling going on there to suit my liking.

Swapped out the plain nuts for AN363's and immediately felt a sense of ease.

Also, where does it say you can't reuse all metal self locking nuts? I presume the prevailing torques mentioned in AC 43.13.1B, Section 4, Para 7-64, Sub Para F and Table 7-2 relate to all styles of self-locking nuts?

If not, what would the argument be for reusing anchor nuts?
__________________
Paid up 23/01/2020
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 04-30-2020, 09:08 AM
9GT's Avatar
9GT 9GT is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southern Michigan
Posts: 1,964
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by snopercod View Post
Has anybody tried using Nord-Lock washers in this application?
There is a good comparison and testing video using various methods of nut locking. The Nord-Lock washer is pretty impressive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKwWu2w1gGk
__________________
David C.
Howell, MI
RV-10: #41686 Under Construction
RV-9A: #90949 Under Construction
RV-10: #40637 Completed/Sold 2016
Cozy MKIV:#656 Completed/Sold 2007
"Donor Exempt" but donated through Dec. 2020
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.