|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

12-07-2019, 04:36 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: 52F
Posts: 187
|
|
RV-8 Angle Valve quesiton
Hey everyone. I have a friend who is possibly looking at an 8 angle valve. He is around 250lbs. Does anyone have any knowledge about CG issues / envelope / ballast needs ect that could help out. He's not sure if he needs to stick to a parallel or not.
Thanks in advance!
__________________
46 Luscombe 8a Rag Wing, Armstrong starter
RV-6, IO-320, Catto, G3X Panel (Thanks Walt!)
|

12-07-2019, 04:58 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,476
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyinhood
Hey everyone. I have a friend who is possibly looking at an 8 angle valve. He is around 250lbs. Does anyone have any knowledge about CG issues / envelope / ballast needs ect that could help out. He's not sure if he needs to stick to a parallel or not.
Thanks in advance!
|
Mine is a 390 with a metal Hartzell, so it's as nose heavy as any. Put him in touch and I'll send a W&B Excel spreadsheet.
Short version; when solo, it will be at, or a little beyond the forward CG. Doesn't seem to hurt anything, although it will run out of trim at low speed, and the aft stick forces get high during acro.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
|

12-07-2019, 05:05 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dogwood Airpark (VA42)
Posts: 2,587
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyinhood
Hey everyone. I have a friend who is possibly looking at an 8 angle valve. He is around 250lbs. Does anyone have any knowledge about CG issues / envelope / ballast needs ect that could help out. He's not sure if he needs to stick to a parallel or not.
Thanks in advance!
|
If he mounts the battery in the aft location he should be fine.
Carl
|

12-07-2019, 06:26 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 470
|
|
Mine has battery in back and absolutely no problem.
|

12-07-2019, 06:41 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,642
|
|
200AV with metal Hartzel BAF, rear battery. 1143 and 80.25 CG empty. Still has some room before it runs out of the fwd limit but flies just as Dan describes.
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.
Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
|

12-07-2019, 07:00 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Northern CA
Posts: 430
|
|
If you run the Hartzell composite blended airfoil prop it would probably be pretty close to a wash cg wise.
Hartzell composite is about 20 pounds lighter out on the nose vs the angle valve being about 35 heavier at engine location.
|

12-08-2019, 12:06 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 877
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyinhood
Hey everyone. I have a friend who is possibly looking at an 8 angle valve. He is around 250lbs. Does anyone have any knowledge about CG issues / envelope / ballast needs ect that could help out. He's not sure if he needs to stick to a parallel or not.
Thanks in advance!
|
It should be no problem. I?m about ~245 and fly an -8 with an angle valve and heavy Hartzell blended airfoil prop. Since the front seat of the -8 is behind the CG a heavy pilot helps offset a heavy engine/prop.
Skylor
|

12-08-2019, 06:55 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: 52F
Posts: 187
|
|
Thanks everyone. Another example of learning something new on VAF.
__________________
46 Luscombe 8a Rag Wing, Armstrong starter
RV-6, IO-320, Catto, G3X Panel (Thanks Walt!)
|

12-09-2019, 05:31 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 470
|
|
Just one other note. I've owned two 8s. One was an 0-360 with a composite fixed pitch prop. In other words, it had an empty CG further aft than my current 8 which is an IO-360 angle valve with a Hartzell metal CS prop which has an empty CG right on the forward limit. I very much prefer the second airplane. Everything that goes into it ( nose baggage excepted) moves the CG aft so, as soon as I sit down in the cockpit, the CG is fine. Fuel does the same. Passengers and rear baggage even more. The big difference is that this airplane doesn't seem to suffer from that landing "twitchiness" that my first 8 did. Landing that aft cg airplane, with someone in the rear, took a whole different technique.
|

12-09-2019, 07:23 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: 52F
Posts: 187
|
|
Thanks. Good to know.
__________________
46 Luscombe 8a Rag Wing, Armstrong starter
RV-6, IO-320, Catto, G3X Panel (Thanks Walt!)
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:05 PM.
|