VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Model Specific > RV-6/6A
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-26-2019, 08:41 PM
JordanGrant's Avatar
JordanGrant JordanGrant is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 324
Default 3D Printed Fire Extinguisher Mount

For the past many years, my Halon fire extinguisher has been mounted in-between the seats in our RV-6. It's actually kind of a pain to get to there, and it has been getting knocked around and beating up the mount lately. So this year, I decided to move the fire extinguisher down to mount on the the front of the wing spar, underneath the pilots legs. I designed and 3D printed a custom mount (ABS plastic), and I ended up attaching that to some bars that are held in place by the wing spar bolts. Here are some pics to share the idea:







Any mounting location for a piece of emergency equipment will be a compromise to some degree, but so far I like how it turned out. We'll see how I like it after getting some time flying in this configuration.

Cheers,
__________________
Jordan Grant
RV-6 N198G
Monthly donation started Mar '20
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-27-2019, 08:01 AM
Snowflake's Avatar
Snowflake Snowflake is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,926
Default

Keep in mind that in the event of an off-airport excursion, that fire extinguisher will be somewhere around your rudder pedals when the metal stops moving. If you're counting on it being available after a crash, mount it on the aft surface of something solid. Battery box, seat back, back side of the flap brace (in the baggage compartment) etc.
__________________
Rob Prior
1996 RV-6 "Tweety" C-FRBP (formerly N196RV)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-27-2019, 08:18 AM
snopercod's Avatar
snopercod snopercod is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 2,092
Default

Very nice. The traditional mounts with the bale on them are a PITA.
__________________
(2020 dues paid)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-27-2019, 11:10 AM
upperdeck upperdeck is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Menomonee Falls, WI
Posts: 145
Default

In the event of a sudden stop, I'd be afraid it would become a projectile and pulverize my ankles and impede my egress. At least a metal bail has a chance of keeping the extinguisher in place.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-27-2019, 11:12 AM
lr172 lr172 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Schaumburg, IL
Posts: 5,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by upperdeck View Post
In the event of a sudden stop, I'd be afraid it would become a projectile and pulverize my ankles and impede my egress. At least a metal bail has a chance of keeping the extinguisher in place.
+1

That design would scare me. That bottle is a relatively heavy metal object and would not want it loose during a crash. I am not even sure it won't break loose in heavy turbulence.

Larry
__________________
N64LR - RV-6A / IO-320, Flying as of 8/2015
N11LR - RV-10, Flying as of 12/2019
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-27-2019, 12:16 PM
alpinelakespilot2000 alpinelakespilot2000 is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,642
Default

+1. Good concept though. Just needs some sort of secondary safety to keep it immobile.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowflake View Post
Keep in mind that in the event of an off-airport excursion, that fire extinguisher will be somewhere around your rudder pedals when the metal stops moving. If you're counting on it being available after a crash, mount it on the aft surface of something solid. Battery box, seat back, back side of the flap brace (in the baggage compartment) etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by upperdeck View Post
In the event of a sudden stop, I'd be afraid it would become a projectile and pulverize my ankles and impede my egress. At least a metal bail has a chance of keeping the extinguisher in place.
Quote:
Originally Posted by lr172 View Post
+1

That design would scare me. That bottle is a relatively heavy metal object and would not want it loose during a crash. I am not even sure it won't break loose in heavy turbulence.

Larry
__________________
Steve M.
Ellensburg WA
RV-9 Flying, 0-320, Catto

Donation reminder: Jan. 2021
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-27-2019, 12:59 PM
bruceh's Avatar
bruceh bruceh is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ramona, CA
Posts: 2,367
Default

I would add a slot behind the mount and at least put a velcro cinch strap or wire tie around the extinguisher to hold it in place.
__________________
Bruce Hill
RV-9A N5771H flown over 800 hours!
http://www.overthehills.com/RV-9A-Project
APRS Tracking for KJ6YRP and New Flying Blog
2020 VAF donator
EAA Tech Counselor, Build assistance - canopy/tanks/fiberglass/electrical/repairs
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-27-2019, 02:36 PM
Canadian_JOY Canadian_JOY is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,280
Default

I once bought a wrecked version of my "other airplane" for parts... It had gone into an earthen berm at about 70mph. This particular aircraft features a glare shield which is primary structure, made of riveted aluminum with heavy aluminum angle reinforcement under it.

This particular aircraft had its fire extinguisher mounted on the forward side of the bulkhead that formed the demarcation between the baggage area and the tail cone. The extinguisher was mounted in its factory-supplied mount, horizontally, bolted very well to the bulkhead.

On impact the extinguisher broke free, rocketed forward, hit the angled windshield, was deflected downward, stove in the glare shield, then rocketed aft and stove in the aft baggage bulkhead. I mean stove it in, as in a dent the shape of the extinguisher as though it had been hydro-formed about 1.5" deep.

If a passenger had been in the seat at the time of impact they would have been killed by blunt force trauma to the head by that flying extinguisher.

I'm sorry to say it, but your extinguisher mount, as well executed as it is, would almost guarantee massive damage to your legs, even in a very survivable crash.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-27-2019, 03:07 PM
fl-mike's Avatar
fl-mike fl-mike is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,341
Default

DO-160G imposes a crash safety load of 20g's in the forward direction. The purpose of the test is to ensure that equipment stays attached in the event of a crash and does not become a hazard to the occupants, fuel systems, etc. (note that DO-160 is not a set of requirements, but rather a set of standards that may be called out in other requirements documents)
If that's a 2.5 lb extinguisher, you should design the mount and bracket to restrain a minimum of 50 lbs of force.
By inspection, I can tell you will not achieve anywhere near that with your design.

Note that velcro straps are no longer allowed for ELT mounting for just this reason.
__________________
Mike W
Venice, FL
RV-6A. Mattituck TMX O-360, FP, GRT Sport EFIS, L3 Lynx NGT-9000
N164WM
N184WM reserved (RV-8)....finishing kit in progress. Titan IOX-370

Last edited by fl-mike : 11-27-2019 at 08:40 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-27-2019, 05:13 PM
RVDan RVDan is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 819
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fl-mike View Post
DO-160G imposes a crash safety load of 20g's in the forward direction. The purpose of the test is to ensure that equipment stays attached in the event of a crash and does not become a hazard to the occupants, fuel systems, etc.
If that's a 2.5 lb extinguisher, you should design the mount and bracket to restrain a minimum of 50 lbs of force.
By inspection, I can tell you will not achieve anywhere near that with your design.

Note that velcro straps are no longer allowed for ELT mounting for just this reason.
Well the DO-160 ref is accurate, the Part 23 Reg?s that our airplanes were designed to call for 9 g?s ultimate. The later Reg?s called for 18g for items of mass in occupied spaces, which is what drives the DO-160 20 g test. But still, the bracket won?t likely hold 9g. The ELT Velcro straps were eliminated because of the variables caused by less than perfect alignment of the straps, and deterioration of the hook and loop over time. When initially qualified, the ELT straps passed the DO-160 testing, but it was found that these variables resulted in poor performance as the installations aged. I personally don?t like Velcro for the retention of items of mass.
__________________
Dan Morris
Frederick, MD
PA28-140
Hph 304CZ
RV6 built and sold
N199EC RV6A flying
Learn the facts. "Democracy dies in darkness"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.