Quote:
Originally Posted by FlyGuy65
Working an older (2003) RV-7 slow build, but this probably cuts across a few different models, so here goes...
Bought the fuel capacitance sender option with the wing kit. Now it's getting near time to start working on the tanks. Don't want to start the 'float vs cap.' debate (I liked the idea someone posted of having both, just in case!).
My question are:
- whether or not to install the Vans cap. sender which I already have, or are there other newer units which are vastly superior.
- will my older sender units even be compatible with newer glass instrumentation and converter units?
- any thoughts from folks who have the original Vans units installed?
At this point I consider the $ spent on the Vans units as long since gone, but I do have them and the plans from Vans for them: my goal is to have a reliable system with a minimum of mods from the plans - this project has taken long enough!
Thanks in advance!
PS don't plan on mixing fuel types, and do plan on getting fuel flow transducer when the time comes
|
I have them on my 7, and love them. Never had any problems with them. What I *did* have problems with was the "stock" Dynon C2V converters, which could not take advantage of the full 0-5V range, utilizing only a tiny portion of it in the middle, so the mid-range readings were for s**t. Switched to the Princeton 2-setpoint converters almost immediately, and they've been great for over 700 hours now. (With the Princeton converters, you empty the tank, and set that as 0V, fill the tank, set that as 5V, *then* do the 2 gallon increments for the Dynon EFIS, or whatever your EFIS calibration process is, so you're using all of 0-5V).
I don't know why Van's quit selling these...they're dirt simple, no moving parts, cover the full range of fuel at any attitude equally accurately. Heck of a nice system, IMO.