VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #21  
Old 06-12-2019, 04:07 PM
Tommy123 Tommy123 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Naples fl
Posts: 140
Default

Man, the thought of reclocking constant speed prop several times to get it in the best position makes my fingers hurt.
I bought dual SDS ignition with flywheel triggers, can’t comment on how well it works, got distracted rebuilding my brother’s M20C. I installed a surefly on the Mooney, ground checks good but again, the weather here is keeping me grounded. The 100 hour since overhaul Bendix mag quit after first flight after engine overhaul. Using advanced mode.

Last edited by Tommy123 : 06-12-2019 at 04:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 06-12-2019, 04:47 PM
hgerhardt's Avatar
hgerhardt hgerhardt is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: torrance, ca
Posts: 645
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanH View Post
.........Good discussion of prop clocking here some years ago, with input from Les Dowd. .......... An A3B6D/McCauley combination may be fine on a Mooney 201, but it's pretty awful on an RV. .......
The combination you reference (which is the McCauley paddle blades together with the -A3B6D clocking) might have been awful on your -8, but it's not the clocking necessarily that made it bad, it's the blade style, as you or someone else alluded to later.

The -A3B6D already has the 'preferred' prop clocking that Mike Stewart advocated 12 years ago (in that same thread), which puts the prop aligned to #1 crankpin.

I know from my own -6 with -A3B6D/Hartzell (F7666 blades) that it's quite smooth (of course, that's seat of my pants).
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 06-12-2019, 05:37 PM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is online now
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,476
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hgerhardt View Post
I know from my own -6 with -A3B6D/Hartzell (F7666 blades) that it's quite smooth (of course, that's seat of my pants).
I was thinking about the restricted RPM/manifold pressure combination. Yep, it was lovely at normal settings. The problem was flying an approach. The prohibited range shook the airframe, but worse, it seemed to always be exactly the power needed for a glideslope.

Found it...avoid 2250 - 2550 rpm below 15" MAP while descending.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390

Last edited by DanH : 06-12-2019 at 05:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:07 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.