|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

06-09-2019, 11:53 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Weeki Wachee, FL
Posts: 6
|
|
riveting question
Does it matter which side you put the manufactured head vs shop head? I riveted the HS 710,714 and 00001 to the front spar with manufactured heads facing aft. looking at another builders photos, mine are opposite. i don't see any clearance issues but want to make sure.
__________________
Joe Brown
Weeki Wachee, FL
RV -7A empennage ordered
Currently flying a Cherokee 150
__________________
Joe Brown
Weeki Wachee, FL
RV -7A empennage ordered
Currently flying a Cherokee 150
|

06-09-2019, 12:15 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Estes Park, CO
Posts: 3,931
|
|
Rivet orientation
Typically manufactured head on thinnest material side but I wouldn't drill them to reverse them. They are just as strong and potential for damage isn't worth the risk.
__________________
Larry Larson
Estes Park, CO
http://wirejockrv7a.blogspot.com
wirejock at yahoo dot com
Donated 12/03/2019, plus a little extra.
RV-7A #73391, N511RV reserved (2,000+ hours)
HS SB, empennage, tanks, wings, fuse, working finishing kit
Disclaimer
I cannot be, nor will I be, held responsible if you try to do the same things I do and it does not work and/or causes you loss, injury, or even death in the process.
|

06-09-2019, 12:40 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Weeki Wachee, FL
Posts: 6
|
|
Thank you Larry, that's good to know going forward.
__________________
Joe Brown
Weeki Wachee, FL
RV -7A empennage ordered
Currently flying a Cherokee 150
|

06-09-2019, 12:41 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,341
|
|
What Larry said, and also consider access to drill out one if you mess up.
__________________
Mike W
Venice, FL
RV-6A. Mattituck TMX O-360, FP, GRT Sport EFIS, L3 Lynx NGT-9000
N164WM
N184WM reserved (RV-8)....finishing kit in progress. Titan IOX-370
|

06-09-2019, 06:04 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Naples fl
Posts: 140
|
|
Reference
Considering how basic a question this is I would advise you to study Standard Practices references. If the plans show a rivet that is different from standard practices, follow the plans, it was done for a reason. They lost some fighters years ago because a guy at the factory installed hardware following standard practices instead of engineering drawings. When in doubt ask Vans.
Anyway, buy a copy of AC 43.13 1b
Last edited by Tommy123 : 06-09-2019 at 06:07 PM.
|

06-09-2019, 07:13 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Estes Park, CO
Posts: 3,931
|
|
AC 43-13-1B
__________________
Larry Larson
Estes Park, CO
http://wirejockrv7a.blogspot.com
wirejock at yahoo dot com
Donated 12/03/2019, plus a little extra.
RV-7A #73391, N511RV reserved (2,000+ hours)
HS SB, empennage, tanks, wings, fuse, working finishing kit
Disclaimer
I cannot be, nor will I be, held responsible if you try to do the same things I do and it does not work and/or causes you loss, injury, or even death in the process.
|

06-09-2019, 07:31 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Antioch, Tennessee
Posts: 102
|
|
Some very good tribal knowledge (rule-of-thumbs) on this thread. And I second that AC-43-13. Must have.
Also, and I believe I read this somewhere in the vans instructions, but take notice on the drawings the rivet call outs. The way the list parts in and order give you instruction on where to insert a rivet into a hole. There is a reason for the order of listing of parts there.
Maybe I was actually told this by one of the Aero engineers at Vans. But once I learned that, that cleared up a lot of confusion.
__________________
Dan K. RV-8 kit purchased 2014, build start Jan 2018, Slow build Emp. done - March 2018, Slow build Wings done -Oct 2018, QB Fuselage started - Sep 2018
Avionics in - April 2019. Engine and Finish kit in hand 2019.
VAF dues paid!
|

06-09-2019, 08:51 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: US
Posts: 2,245
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wirejock
Typically manufactured head on thinnest material side
|
This is true, but I notice that nobody told the OP *why*...
It's because doing it this way is less likely to cause the thinner material to "curl up" or lift up away from the other part around the rivet.
Try a test or two...take some scrap metals, one thin, the other thick, and do it both ways and see what happens. You'll see that if you put the driven ("shop") head on the thin material, the material will rise up away from the substructure.
__________________
2019 Dues paid!
|

06-10-2019, 07:48 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: WNC
Posts: 246
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RV7A Flyer
This is true, but I notice that nobody told the OP *why*...
It's because doing it this way is less likely to cause the thinner material to "curl up" or lift up away from the other part around the rivet.
Try a test or two...take some scrap metals, one thin, the other thick, and do it both ways and see what happens. You'll see that if you put the driven ("shop") head on the thin material, the material will rise up away from the substructure.
|
Yep. Ran into this putting the rivets into the rear spar on the elevators on the -10. The ribs wanted to curl up when placing the factory head on the spar. Flipped them around and everything went well.
Also note that the MIL spec says "3.3.3.1 Head direction. Unless specified on the engineering drawing or specification, the manufactured head of the rivet shall be located on exterior surfaces."
There are times where the plans will say to put the manufactured head on a specific side.
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:05 PM.
|