VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #11  
Old 06-15-2007, 10:17 PM
TShort TShort is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Indianapolis, IN (KUMP)
Posts: 1,019
Default

I got 80%, too - because of the two "opinion" questions!

The way I see it, a 3 pointer (or a 2 pointer as described above) gives you great control if done properly, i.e. touchdown in a stall. The airplane is done flying, weight on the mains and tailwheel, so control is there.
My problem with the wheelies is that there is a period of time (however short) where you may be very vulnerable to an unexpected gust while bringing the tail down. Plus, in the 170, finessing one main onto the ground in a gusty x-wind without a bounce is exceedingly difficult to do well.

They all finish as 3 pointers in the end!

Thomas
__________________
Thomas Short
KUMP - Indianapolis, IN / KAEJ - Buena Vista, CO
RV-10 N410TS bought / flying
RV-8 wings / fuse in progress ... still
1948 Cessna 170 N3949V
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-15-2007, 10:24 PM
dan's Avatar
dan dan is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: ...
Posts: 2,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TShort
My problem with the wheelies is that there is a period of time (however short) where you may be very vulnerable to an unexpected gust while bringing the tail down.
That's why, when the winds are gusting, I add power as I'm bringing the tail down.
__________________
Dan Checkoway RV-7
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-15-2007, 10:40 PM
jcoloccia jcoloccia is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,110
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RV8N
Same here. I made an 80% and only missed the questions about crosswind landings. I totally disagree with their reasoning. I would prefer to have all 3 wheels on the ground and using t/w stearing, braking, and power to control it instead of trying to control everything with just rudder as the tail transitions down.

Just my opinion...

Karl
Another 80% because of the crosswind landing questions. This totally depends on the airplane. AOPA is just totally clueless, as usual, and is just parroting what they hear their Cirrus and King Air drivers talking about in the lunch room.

At least they're putting up a good fight on user fees...makes my membership worth it.
__________________
John Coloccia
www.ballofshame.com
Former builder, but still lurking 'cause you're a pretty cool bunch...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-15-2007, 11:00 PM
yakdriver yakdriver is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Twin Falls, ID
Posts: 683
Default

I also don't agree on the X-wind landings. I personaly three point in x-winds (2point on upwind main and tw if you want to get technical). That is in evrything from a J3 to a Pitts to a T-6. I like to have the airplane all done flying when it touches down and the tailwheel on the ground and in control. At my airport I get a lot of practice in light to heavy x-winds. But it all comes down to whatever works for you and what you are comforatable with. Don
__________________
RV 7 N212MD Flying as of 12/22/2007
Backcountry/TCOW Super Cub flying 03/12/2011
Next project?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-15-2007, 11:10 PM
N908RV's Avatar
N908RV N908RV is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Warrenton, VA
Posts: 273
Default Comparing X-wind notes

Since we are all comparing.... For lighter x/winds, I do wheelies on one wheel, but once the winds are fierce, I just deal with the RV-8's mediocre three point behavior and come down two point (upwind main and TW). I agree, when possible three point landings (really 2 point) favoring the upwind wheel are best.

Dan - interesting comment about adding power, that is a good tip and something I've never tried, but that will give you lots of additional control provided you have a long enough runway, which most do.
__________________
Rob Brooks
EAA Tech Counselor
Warrenton, VA

RV-8, QB completed, flown 750hrs and sold
http://www.taildraggersinc.com/pages...RV_flying.html

RV-7, SB completed and flying Phase 2
http://www.mykitlog.com/N908rv/
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-15-2007, 11:41 PM
hngrflyr hngrflyr is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: eugene, oregon
Posts: 206
Default

I got 100% on the quiz too, because I knew what answers they wanted, but I've been flywheel airplanes for 50+ years and so far, have never groundlooped. I choose three point landings in most every condition. The closest I've come to rolling an airplane up in a pile of wreckage was during a wheel landing in a gusty crosswind, just as the tail was starting to settle. I was able to save it with a blast of power. It was close to going around and I was still rolling fast enough to tear the gearbox out if it did. Lately I've been flying an RV-6, a Cessna 120 and an N3N-3 with a R-985 up front. The N3N does not have a steerable tailwheel, but it does lock for take offs and landings.
__________________
Bob Severns
Eugene, Oregon
RV-6
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-16-2007, 04:34 AM
8CW 8CW is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 317
Default 10/10

In the Luscombe I had, I found it was generally easier for me to carry a little more speed and land on the upwind main in a crosswind. As the plane slowed, I'd drop the other main or tailwheel next depending on how strong the wind was. Don't know abut the RV, never flown one... yet.

Bill Settle
-8 Wings
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-16-2007, 07:10 AM
yakdriver yakdriver is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Twin Falls, ID
Posts: 683
Default

Hey Bob, I've got around 300hrs in an N3N. We had a very stock one with the 30x5 tall skinney tires. That airplane could be a real bear in a strong x-wind. Don
__________________
RV 7 N212MD Flying as of 12/22/2007
Backcountry/TCOW Super Cub flying 03/12/2011
Next project?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-16-2007, 07:38 AM
Dgamble's Avatar
Dgamble Dgamble is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dan
#6 was a gimme for me, as I live with it every single landing. If I were ever to become an FFI wingman, I'm convinced my callsign would be 'Tigger,' given that bouncing is what Tigger's do best!
__________________
Dave Gamble
Grove City, OH

RV-6 N466PG Purchased already flying - SOLD!

The Book: The PapaGolf Chronicles

Built RV-12
http://www.schmetterlingaviation.com

The Book: Being written.

The above web blogs and any links provided thereto are not instructional or advisory in nature. They merely seek to share my experiences in building and flying Van's RV airplanes.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-16-2007, 09:04 AM
McFly's Avatar
McFly McFly is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 333
Default I can hear still hear my TW instuctors voice

"Boy, all your doing in a wheel landing is prolonging the agony. That tail has to come down sometime"

He was a primary flight instructor during WWII and he is still flying! So as you might guess, I am a fan of the three point. The best technique is the technique that works best for you, there is no absolute here IMHO.
__________________
Hugh
Northern California
RV-7 Flying
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:49 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.