Quote:
Originally Posted by rv7boy
I think Sam's post today about the recent recognition of Van by the AOPA Air Safety Institute would help to answer the original question posted in this thread.
|
It does help. Unfortunately, neither the video, or the article had citations to the stats they claim. I don't doubt them though. Transition training is very important.
I can't even imagine just jumping in Vans RV and taking off with no training. A recipe for disaster, but that's what they did in the old days.
My grandfather's best friend Ned loved airplanes and wanted to fly, so during the Great Depression he built himself a Model A powered Pietenpol. (As best I can tell from picking my grandpa's brain and showing him pictures of period plans built planes.) When he finished it, he invited everyone out to a field to watch him fly in his flying machine. Ned had no pilot's license and no training.
My grandmother famously tells the story of how Ned "dragged his *** across the field" that day. From the sounds of my grandparents telling, Ned never got out of ground effect and did end up crashing the plane on the first flight. Wrecked the plane and broke his arm. Everyone called him a **** fool. Ned and the plane never flew again.
However, it did not kill Ned's love of airplanes and he led a successful career as a mechanic for the airlines during the piston and jet era. In the end he retired from United. Besides being a master mechanic, he was an accomplished machinist who liked to make fully functional replica firearms amongst other things. The Colt Peacemaker he showed me once was amazing. I thought it was the real deal. He also drove a Corvair for decades because "It has an airplane engine in it."
If Ned had been born later and was alive now, I'm convinced he would be an EAA'er and flying God knows what that he built himself. I also think he would have gotten a PPL, training and not crashed on the first go, but those are things that weren't easy for him to do in rural Minnesota back in the '30s. He was great guy.