VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV Ongoing Maintenance Issues
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-29-2016, 01:38 PM
ChiefPilot's Avatar
ChiefPilot ChiefPilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 1,565
Default

This issue has come up before. I would caution that ensuring the correct cells are used and following the steps listed by the original post are beyond the capability of most builders. Even should you be successful, ELTs are routinely disassembled and inspected by an FAA inspector during the ramp check each general aviation aircraft experiences both before and after every flight.

It's just not worth it.

__________________
Brad Benson, Maplewood MN.
RV-6A N164BL, Flying since Nov 2012!
If you're not making mistakes, you're probably not making anything
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-29-2016, 04:29 PM
Ben Meyer Ben Meyer is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Peachtree City, GA
Posts: 54
Default

Does said Inspector have a subpoena? That's the only way they can access your airplane without your permission, correct?
__________________
Ben Meyer
FFC
RV-6A
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-29-2016, 06:03 PM
Larco's Avatar
Larco Larco is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: DVT Phoenix
Posts: 1,187
Default

Maybe I worry to much about certain things but my thought is, IF a passenger is badly hurt or killed in your airplane and the ELT did not work as should have, there may be trouble. But if it didn’t work because it was opened up and repaired in an unauthorized manner you are for sure in trouble. My belief is that it is the owners responsibility to maintain the ELT. The testing should be done and logged by the owner or authorized person per the appropriate FAR. Lots of owners don’t do this because they just don’t know about it.
It’s more of an insurance thing than a FAA matter to me.
I am however impressed with the author of the battery replacement but for 50/75 bucks I would rather have piece of mind.

Just looking at it from a different angle. :-) Larry

Last edited by Larco : 09-29-2016 at 06:10 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 02-16-2018, 04:56 PM
SMO's Avatar
SMO SMO is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Salmon Arm, BC
Posts: 933
Default

Hmm, maybe ACK got wind of this thread. Here is the new battery I received yesterday:

__________________
Mark Olson
1987 RV-4 Sold
2003 Super Decathlon - Sold
F1 EVO Rocket, first flight May 31/14
First in line for the Sonex JSX-2T kit
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 02-16-2018, 05:47 PM
Canadian_JOY Canadian_JOY is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 2,280
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SMO View Post
Hmm, maybe ACK got wind of this thread. Here is the new battery I received yesterday:
Refer to post #20 in this discussion thread... Posting by ACK. Yup, they came here to set the record straight. I'm glad as I've been preaching this gospel on this forum for quite some time and, sometimes, have felt like I might as well have saved my breath to cool my porridge.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 02-16-2018, 06:42 PM
Bevan Bevan is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: BC
Posts: 1,674
Default

Looking at any perceived liability issue from the other side, what is the ELT's or FAA's liability if the TSO's device (including proper factory batteries) fails to perform during a crash? Are they going to be held responsible? If not, then how can the home-builder who's done his best to keep the batteries current (along with the rest of the aircraft) which presumably has a warning decal for the passenger to see that reads "this aircraft does not conform to internationally recognized standards" etc. be held accountable to any degree higher?

Seems like a double standard to me.

Bevan
__________________
RV7A Flying since 2015
O-360-A1F6 (parallel valve) 180HP
Dual P-mags
Precision F.I. with AP purge valve
Vinyl Wrapped Exterior
Grand Rapids EFIS
Located in western Canada
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 02-16-2018, 07:31 PM
airguy's Avatar
airguy airguy is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Garden City, Tx
Posts: 5,120
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bevan View Post
Looking at any perceived liability issue from the other side, what is the ELT's or FAA's liability if the TSO's device (including proper factory batteries) fails to perform during a crash? Are they going to be held responsible? If not, then how can the home-builder who's done his best to keep the batteries current (along with the rest of the aircraft) which presumably has a warning decal for the passenger to see that reads "this aircraft does not conform to internationally recognized standards" etc. be held accountable to any degree higher?

Seems like a double standard to me.

Bevan
Exactly correct. If the ELT manufacturer can guarantee me (and my heirs/family), absolutely, that the ELT will perform exactly as intended in ANY and ALL crash scenarios, then perhaps I would be more inclined to pay attention to them protecting their market by emphasizing the TSO requirements.
__________________
Greg Niehues - SEL, IFR, Repairman Cert.
Garden City, TX VAF 2020 dues paid
N16GN flying 700 hrs and counting; IO360, SDS, WWRV200, Dynon HDX, 430W
Built an off-plan RV9A with too much fuel and too much HP. Should drop dead any minute now.

Last edited by airguy : 02-16-2018 at 09:16 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 02-16-2018, 08:14 PM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,476
Default

Meanwhile back at the ranch....

I recently replaced mine and noticed the expiration time clock seems to start when they manufacture the pack. Soooo, it will probably pay to order yours from a high volume retailer, and then check the date as soon as it arrives.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 02-16-2018, 10:47 PM
SMO's Avatar
SMO SMO is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Salmon Arm, BC
Posts: 933
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DanH View Post
Meanwhile back at the ranch....

I recently replaced mine and noticed the expiration time clock seems to start when they manufacture the pack. Soooo, it will probably pay to order yours from a high volume retailer, and then check the date as soon as it arrives.
Mine came from Pacific Coast Avionics and was dated January 26, 2018. I was pleasantly surprised.
__________________
Mark Olson
1987 RV-4 Sold
2003 Super Decathlon - Sold
F1 EVO Rocket, first flight May 31/14
First in line for the Sonex JSX-2T kit
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-11-2018, 05:55 AM
dbuds2's Avatar
dbuds2 dbuds2 is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Palm Beach Gardens, Fl
Posts: 402
Default TSO?

Do EAB aircraft have to comply with TSO?
__________________
Bud Smith, RV-8, ECI IOX360 , Dual PMags, Dynon SkyView, Whirlwind 200GA, IFR and N88ZP has "slipped the surly bonds of earth".
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.