|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

02-06-2018, 10:10 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Deux-Montagnes, Qc, Canada
Posts: 159
|
|
51% rule
Question for buyers or sellers that have imported/exported homebuilt aircraft to the US from Canada. What was required by the FAA to show compliance to the 51% rule by a Canadian builder?
Michel
__________________
Exempted but dues paid through 12/2020
RV-9 Sold
RV-10 Flying
|

02-06-2018, 11:57 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Socal
Posts: 453
|
|
Nothing really.
__________________
RV-8 N695RA flying
Working on an RV-4
Born to fly, forced to work
|

02-07-2018, 03:10 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 474
|
|
51%
Build log was sufficient.
|

02-07-2018, 05:56 AM
|
|
Super Moderator
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Locust Grove, GA
Posts: 2,626
|
|
Same requirements as in the US---a builder's log is sufficient to show compliance with the 51% rule.
Vic
__________________
 Vic Syracuse
Built RV-4, RV-6, 2-RV-10's, RV-7A, RV-8, Prescott Pusher, Kitfox Model II, Kitfox Speedster, Kitfox 7 Super Sport, Just Superstol, DAR, A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor/Flight Advisor, CFII-ASMEL/ASES
Kitplanes "Unairworthy" monthly feature
EAA Sport Aviation "Checkpoints" column
EAA Homebuilt Council Chair/member EAA BOD
Author "Pre-Buy Guide for Amateur-Built Aircraft"
www.Baselegaviation.com
|

02-07-2018, 06:37 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Deux-Montagnes, Qc, Canada
Posts: 159
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by vic syracuse
Same requirements as in the US---a builder's log is sufficient to show compliance with the 51% rule.
Vic
|
What about when there is no builder log as such, which is not required under Canadian regulations? Would an affidavit from the builder satisfies the FAA?
Regards,
Michel
__________________
Exempted but dues paid through 12/2020
RV-9 Sold
RV-10 Flying
|

02-07-2018, 07:41 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 3,932
|
|
You'd have a hard time building an Amateur-Built in Canada without showing a builder's log to MD-RA during the inspections. Not saying it's impossible, but that you'd have an uphill battle proving to the inspector that you built it.
__________________
Rob Prior
1996 RV-6 "Tweety" C-FRBP (formerly N196RV)
|

02-07-2018, 08:09 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Virginia
Posts: 91
|
|
My plane was imported by the guy I bought it from. The paperwork wasn't "good enough", whatever that means, for and airworthiness certificate here in the states. The DAR approved the plane to fly and the owner had to fly off the 25 hours conducting all the tests as if he built it. Then the cert was issued. Not sure, but I don't think he got a builders cert to perform inspections on it. But he had it maintained by an A&P anyway.
|

02-07-2018, 08:37 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Reno NV
Posts: 542
|
|
51% rule
I have built 3 different aircraft, all of them signed off by a FSDO inspector. My experience was the inspector was more interested in the required paperwork being correct and builder knowledge of the build. As to builder knowledge, they would ask subtle questions about a particular area about how did I get this or that to fit. Seems they had some knowledge in those areas. I suggest you talk to other builders and ask the same questions about the part of your project already built. Just one opinion. Dan from Reno
|

02-07-2018, 01:24 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,797
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MWH265
My plane was imported by the guy I bought it from. The paperwork wasn't "good enough", whatever that means, for and airworthiness certificate here in the states. The DAR approved the plane to fly and the owner had to fly off the 25 hours conducting all the tests as if he built it. Then the cert was issued. Not sure, but I don't think he got a builders cert to perform inspections on it. But he had it maintained by an A&P anyway.
|
Since he was not the builder of the airplane he is not eligible to get a Limited Repairman certificate, to do annual condition inspections.
|

02-07-2018, 02:28 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yarmouth, Nova Scotia
Posts: 2,408
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snowflake
You'd have a hard time building an Amateur-Built in Canada without showing a builder's log to MD-RA during the inspections. Not saying it's impossible, but that you'd have an uphill battle proving to the inspector that you built it.
|
Let me see, I'm on project #7 and the last six never had a builders log. I built them all and it would not take long questioning a builder to find out if they built the airplane. Now if you receive help from someone to do the wiring for example, you would not be able to answer those questions. I do my own wiring also.
Had the MD-RA ask what was the minimum size control cable for flight surfaces when I was building the SuperCubs and I told him I had no clue, but that the SuperCub required 1/8". He said that was the type of answer he liked and that 1/8" was the minimum. He also said that the only size I needed to know on my project was the size required for that aircraft.
When I visit projects, it does not take long to find out who is really the builder.
__________________
Thanks Ron
RV-10 SOLD
RV-14 Flying
AirCam flying
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:36 AM.
|