VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > The Never Ending Debate Section > Tools
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-29-2017, 05:07 AM
RV8Squaz's Avatar
RV8Squaz RV8Squaz is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Senoia, Georgia
Posts: 802
Default Eastern Technology Diffeferential Cylinder Pressure Testers

This text below is from an email I sent to my partners in a F33A Bonanza. The Bonanza has a Continental IO-550B. I also own an RV-8 with a 200hp IO-360A1A. I've been doing my own compression checks since I got the airplane flying more than 10 years ago. Yet, I still learned something new. I'm not an expert at this. I haven't spoken with any engineers at TCM or Eastern Technology. Please let me know if you see any inaccuracies, but the info below I feel is correct and is FYI.

"Hi Guys,

It seems like since we started with the pre-buy inspection, we have been getting very different results each time we have had the differential compression tests done. As you know, when the pre-buy was done we had a couple of cylinders that failed. Later, when we were getting the spar checked in Waco, we had another compression check and it was miraculously better. We even did our own compression check with excellent results. And finally Bob did a a compression check with very poor results. The mystery has now been solved.

Eastern Technology makes basically four different testers. Two do not have the Master Orifice feature and two do. They all have an internal orifice. The Master Orifice is used to establish the minimum acceptable pressure for that day's atmospheric conditions. The models are:

E2A: No master orifice, internal orifice of .040
E2A-1000: No master orifice, internal orifice of .060
E2M: Yes master orifice, internal orifice of .040
E2M-1000: Yes master orifice, internal orifice of .060 This is the one I have.

Lycoming does not specify the use of a master orifice to establish minimum acceptable compression. Continental does. This minimum is typically about 40-45 psi and is determined with free flowing air without hooking up the tester to a cylinder by opening the master orifice and reading the right pressure gage with the left pressure gage at 80 psi.

So how do you know whether to use one with a .040 orifice vs one that is .060? Well it clearly states on the Eastern Technology?s website that with cylinder bores less than 5.00? you use the .040 orifice tester and over 5.00? you use the one with the .060 orifice.

http://www.easterntech.com/e2m.html

The bore on the IO-360 on my RV-8 is 5.125.? This is why I have the E2M-1000. I bought it with Master Orifice feature because if I ever owned an airplane with a Continental, it would save me from having to buy another tester. The bore on our TCM IO-550B is 5.25.? Perfect.

Now that I know how to use the Master Orifice (MO) feature I decided to give it a try the other day. I didn?t really know how to use it when we did our own compression check. So I checked the use of the MO and I got a minimum acceptable pressure of about 68 psi! What! How can that be? My friend Jon and I discussed it and we assumed there was something wrong with my tester. It should be in the low 40s.

Today, I went to check on the Bonanza, it's getting an annual inspection, and see what kind of progress Bob, the shop owner was making. It was cool to see six shiny and bright, brand new cylinders on the table! I saw his compression test results on the squawk sheet and some were in the 20s. Yikes! How can that be? When we did it our compression check a couple of weeks ago, most of ours were in the 60s and even 70s. So I asked him about it and a discussion of .040 and .060 testers ensued. I told him I had the right one with .060 orifice and when I checked it I got a minimum pressure of 68 psi. He told me that I was using the wrong one, that TCM specifies the use of the .040 tester. But wait, the bore is over 5.00.? What gives? Bob had several different testers in the shop and we checked the operation of the MO on his E2M and the E2M-1000. The E2M free-flowed at about 42 psi like we expected and his E2M-1000 free-flowed 68 psi just like mine!

OK, now I?m confused. I had the studied the appropriate SB and there is no mention of what size orifice tester to use. Was I wrong to use the tester designed for bores over 5.00??

http://www.easterntech.com/servicebulletin.pdf See Part B.

So once again I spoke with my friend Jon, about my conversation with Bob, the results from our simple experiment of testing the MO on the two testers, and the SB above. Jon said that, a while ago Continental had incorporated a bunch of their old Service Bulletins and Instructions into this manual:

http://sydney.edu.au/engineering/aer...550-manual.pdf

I went digging and lo and behold on page 6-57 is this excerpt:

"The Eastern Technology web site (eastertech.com) indicates a Model
E2M-1000, with a 0.060 Master Orifice should be used on cylinders with
a bore greater than 5.0 inches however, approved type certificate data
pertaining to engines in this manual were approved by the FAA using a
Model E2M Differential Pressure Tester with a 0.040 inch Master Orifice.

? Eastern Technology Corporation Model E2M Cylinder Differential Pressure Tester
(Figure 6-27). This Differential Pressure Tester incorporates a 0.040 inch Master
Orifice Tool"

Go figure. Bob was right. It is indeed specified.

OK back to the actual compression check. If you hook up either tester into a cylinder with no leaks, both testers would indicate a pressure of 80/80 psi. However if you hook up each tester to a cylinder with some leakage, the tester with the larger orifice will flow more air and will consequently indicate a higher pressure than the tester with the smaller orifice which is flowing less air and will indicate a lower pressure. And there you have it. My guess is that James, the pre-buy guy, used the proper tester, the shop in Waco used the wrong tester, we used the wrong tester, and Bob used the correct tester.

So what about the the IO-360 on my RV-8? I don?t know. My bet is that I would get lower compression results with the .040 tester than with the .060 tester. This could explain why my compressions have always been in the high 70s.

Have fun interpreting all of this!"

So why 6 new cylinders? In addition to the compression checks that have been done since the pre-buy, borescope revealed two cylinders with significant exhaust valve discoloration and two more with some discoloration indicating burned valves. This is not surprising since the engine has 1100 hours SMOH and the GAMI spread was almost 2 gph. Who knows how the engine has been operated over the last 23 years! We bought the airplane at a significant discount knowing the condition of the cylinders.
__________________
Jerry Esquenazi
RV-8 N84JE
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-29-2017, 07:07 AM
az_gila's Avatar
az_gila az_gila is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 57AZ - NW Tucson area
Posts: 10,011
Smile

It doesn't really matter what the FAA says about cylinders over 5.00 inches or what the tool maker says when the cylinder/engine manufacturer has specific data.

That data in this case is S1 1191A -

https://www.lycoming.com/sites/defau...ompression.pdf

Specific manufacturer's data over-rides generic data.

The 0.060 orifice tester is what the local Bonanza mechanics have, I just bought one with a 0.040 orifice - the E2M
__________________
Gil Alexander
EAA Technical Counselor, Airframe Mechanic
Half completed RV-10 QB purchased
RV-6A N61GX - finally flying
Grumman Tiger N12GA - flying
La Cholla Airpark (57AZ) Tucson AZ
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-29-2017, 07:09 AM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,500
Default

Good stuff Jerry.

It can be tricky to understand. This may help, from Kitplanes, 2013 (my work, so I can reproduce it here).


__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-29-2017, 07:28 AM
RV8Squaz's Avatar
RV8Squaz RV8Squaz is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Senoia, Georgia
Posts: 802
Default

Wow! Great stuff Gil and Dan. I knew some smart people would chime in

Gil, I've read that SI before, but somehow missed that critical note dictating the orifice size of .040.

Dan, Great article! I've been a Kitplanes subscriber off and on through the years. Your article clearly shows why it's good to be a subscriber. I wish I would have seen your article back in 2013.

Anyone want to buy an E2M-1000? Ha! I'm in market for an E2M now. Going to pay Aircraft Spruce a visit later!
__________________
Jerry Esquenazi
RV-8 N84JE

Last edited by RV8Squaz : 09-29-2017 at 07:36 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-29-2017, 01:51 PM
SHIPCHIEF SHIPCHIEF is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,412
Default

Thank you, the orifice size and rule have been nagging away at the back of my mind. This thread was helpful, I checked my tester, a ATS 2EM.
http://www.aircraft-tool.com/shop/detail.aspx?id=2EM
The ATS web page indicates it to have a .040" orifice, so I feel much better about the previous condition inspections...
Usual disclaimer, no commercial interest etc...
__________________
Scott Emery
http://gallery.eaa326.org/v/members/semery/
EAA 668340, chapter 326 & IAC chapter 67
RV-8 N89SE first flight 12/26/2013
Yak55M, and the wife has an RV-4
There is nothing-absolute nothing-half so much worth doing as simply messing around with Aeroplanes
(with apologies to Ratty)
2019
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-29-2017, 09:04 PM
RV8Squaz's Avatar
RV8Squaz RV8Squaz is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Senoia, Georgia
Posts: 802
Default

I'm very glad to hear my post helped someone!
__________________
Jerry Esquenazi
RV-8 N84JE
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-29-2017, 09:38 PM
PCHunt PCHunt is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 1,670
Default

Here's my theory: My tester has both orifices, if needed. But if I check first with the smaller .040 orifice and it tests well, then I don't worry. If the test is low, I might switch to the bigger .060 orifice and give it another try.

You will always get a better result with the bigger orifice.
__________________
Pete Hunt, [San Diego] VAF #1069
RV-6, RV-6A, T-6G
ATP, CFII, A&P

2020 Donation+, Gladly Sent
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-01-2017, 06:40 AM
RV8Squaz's Avatar
RV8Squaz RV8Squaz is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Senoia, Georgia
Posts: 802
Default

Pete,
The problem with using the bigger orifice at all is it makes leaks/problems harder to detect.

On that day, my .060 orifice tester, the E2M-1000, and my mechanic's tester both free-flowed using the Master Orifice function at 68psi. That means that the the minimum acceptable pressure is 68psi. This in effect gives you a smaller range (68-80) to detect problems.

Of course all of this is meaningless since both the Lycoming and Continental standards are based on using the specified tester with a .040 orifice, which is what my original post was about.

Using the .060 orifice tester will give you a false sense of security. I went ahead and purchased the proper tester on Friday.
__________________
Jerry Esquenazi
RV-8 N84JE
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-15-2017, 10:10 AM
JimRice JimRice is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Collierville, TN
Posts: 99
Default Good Info

This is a great thread/info. I'm in the midst of my Condition Inspection and discovered a low cylinder. All others were 76-78, but right rear is only about 45-50. Going to try borescope tomorrow to see what I find...hoping I don't have to pull a cylinder, but as a former Army boss used to tell me, "Hope is not a valid method."
__________________
Jim Rice
Collierville, TN

1994 RV-4 N4WJ (Purchased/Flying)
1946 J-3 Cub N7155H (Restored/Flying)
1946 Globe Swift N3368K (Purchased Restored/Flying SOLD)
1987 Starduster Too SA-300 (Purchased/Flying/SOLD)
1994 V6STOL (Built w/dad/SOLD)

US Army Retired (still working to pay for flying)

When my ship comes in, I'll probably be at the airport.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-11-2020, 06:53 AM
rvanstory's Avatar
rvanstory rvanstory is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: New Braunfels
Posts: 299
Default E2M Cylinder Pressure Tester

Jerry,

Resurrecting old thread to thank you for this excellent write up! When ordering a cylinder head pressure tester I had NO idea which one was the correct one to order. This post was found via Google and made it very clear for me. Had I not found this post, I would have ordered the wrong tester based on ACS info from manufacturer.

That's why I LOVE this forum. Inexperienced guys like me can learn from the wisdom &/or mistakes of others that take the time to post their experiences.
__________________
Randy Vanstory
Flying RV10 - N783V
1st Flight 08/20/2020
Donation Happily Made 2020
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:57 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.