|
-
POSTING RULES
-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|
09-08-2017, 09:05 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,761
|
|
New Wording for Passenger Warning
Just a "heads-up", as of September 21st, 2017, new ruling on the Passenger Warning;
Except for single place aircraft, the following placard must be displayed in the aircraft in full view of all occupants: “PASSENGER WARNING—THIS AIRCRAFT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH FEDERAL SAFETY REGULATIONS FOR STANDARD AIRCRAFT.”
Note that Experimental, Light-Sport, or Amateur-Built is no longer required wording. This makes for a more "standardized" placard.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Last edited by Mel : 09-08-2017 at 09:13 AM.
|
09-08-2017, 09:08 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Boston Area
Posts: 135
|
|
I hope this is an April Fools joke a few months early.
Tim
|
09-08-2017, 09:09 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,761
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tspear
I hope this is an April Fools joke a few months early.
Tim
|
Nope, it's in the new FAA Order 8130.2J.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
|
09-08-2017, 09:12 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Mojave
Posts: 4,642
|
|
Is this only for newly certificated E-AB's, or is it retroactive? If retroactive, are new ops lims required?
__________________
WARNING! Incorrect design and/or fabrication of aircraft and/or components may result in injury or death. Information presented in this post is based on my own experience - Reader has sole responsibility for determining accuracy or suitability for use.
Michael Robinson
______________
Harmon Rocket II -SDS EFI
RV-8 - SDS CPI
1940 Taylorcraft BL-65
1984 L39C
|
09-08-2017, 09:13 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,761
|
|
It is NOT retroactive. Everything you have now is still good.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
|
09-08-2017, 09:21 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,861
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tspear
I hope this is an April Fools joke a few months early.
Tim
|
Why? All they did was drop the " IS AMATEUR-BUILT" from the current placard. I do hate it though as to me it implies that my aircraft is some how sub-standard.
__________________
Todd "I drink and know things" Stovall
PP ASEL-IA
RV-10 N728TT - Flying!
WAR EAGLE!
|
09-08-2017, 09:26 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Catawba, NC
Posts: 193
|
|
So is my passenger warning on the panel of my yet to be inspected airplane going to cause an issue with the inspector? I used the old wording.
__________________
mangling aluminum since May 2009
RV7-A, flying
RV8 under construction
|
09-08-2017, 09:28 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Ely, Nevada
Posts: 222
|
|
Not necessarily so.
Better wording would be:
"This aircraft is not required to conform to...."
I don't remember seeing a notice and comment opportunity on this, if it was deemed a regulatory change.
__________________
Mike Coster
BUILDER: N92MB RV7A (A/W 3/2009) - Sold
ADOPTED/reworked: N4032Q RV8A (8/2017)
Building: S-21 Outback/Titan, tail and cockpit mated (3/2020)
KELY/Ely, NV
|
09-08-2017, 10:11 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,761
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Auburntsts
Why? All they did was drop the " IS AMATEUR-BUILT" from the current placard. I do hate it though as to me it implies that my aircraft is some how sub-standard.
|
The "Why" is to somewhat standardize the placard so that a different placard is not required for different category of aircraft. i.e. the same placard works for experimental amateur-built and experimental light-sport aircraft.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
|
09-08-2017, 10:14 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,861
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel
The "Why" is to somewhat standardize the placard so that a different placard is not required for different category of aircraft. i.e. the same placard works for experimental amateur-built and experimental light-sport aircraft.
|
Mel I wasn't asking you why - I asking Tim why.
__________________
Todd "I drink and know things" Stovall
PP ASEL-IA
RV-10 N728TT - Flying!
WAR EAGLE!
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:20 PM.
|
Linear Mode
