VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-11-2017, 12:47 PM
rvbuilder2002's Avatar
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 9,035
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl Froehlich View Post
No. Does not work that way at all.

Antennas with no DC connection to ground have been around for decades and I have used many of them HF and up. Here is a simple example of an antenna that is magnetally held to your metal car - so there is paint and a protective plastic cover between the antenna base and the car metal: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00CJ37IQK...a-312080067105

Carl
Yes, and the measured SWR of this type of ant. is usually rather poor.
__________________
Opinions, information and comments are my own unless stated otherwise. They do not necessarily represent the direction/opinions of my employer.

Scott McDaniels
Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop Manager
Hubbard, Oregon
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-11-2017, 04:45 PM
flightlogic's Avatar
flightlogic flightlogic is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,614
Default

Ground it to bare metal. I make my living doing this. Coupling theory will result in very poor VSWR. I measure with mili-ohm meter. Our composite helos get metal mesh and bonding straps to ground also. Transponders are not cheap. Don't trust off the wall theories.
__________________
"Kindness is never a bad plan."

exemption option waived. Donation appropriate.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-11-2017, 07:19 PM
sritchie sritchie is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 130
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flightlogic View Post
Ground it to bare metal. I make my living doing this. Coupling theory will result in very poor VSWR. I measure with mili-ohm meter. Our composite helos get metal mesh and bonding straps to ground also. Transponders are not cheap. Don't trust off the wall theories.
Okay, so to clarify it sounds like I can:

* leave the rubber gasket on
* make sure that my doubler isn't primed, ie down to the bare metal, at the point where the lock washer makes contact
* probably NOT prime the doubler in this case, so that I get a good electrical connection between the doubler and the rest of the aircraft skin?

Sounds like that's going to achieve the best results here, while allowing that rubber gasket to provide some friction.

Does this sound like a good distillation?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-11-2017, 08:39 PM
flightlogic's Avatar
flightlogic flightlogic is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Prescott, AZ
Posts: 1,614
Default

Sounds good. If you really want to, you can seal the base after installation but most don't need to. Depends on your environment. The transponder is a high power pulse type transmiiter. You should still have it tested and logged in airframe logs. Good luck.
__________________
"Kindness is never a bad plan."

exemption option waived. Donation appropriate.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-12-2017, 01:05 AM
BobTurner BobTurner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by flightlogic View Post
Sounds good. If you really want to, you can seal the base after installation but most don't need to. Depends on your environment. The transponder is a high power pulse type transmiiter. You should still have it tested and logged in airframe logs. Good luck.
Not 'should' have it tested; you must have it tested, every two years.
You can prime the doubler, as long as you keep paint out of the rivet holes (the rivets will make the electrical connection to the skin) and where the coax braid goes to ground.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-12-2017, 06:44 AM
rv7charlie rv7charlie is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Pocahontas MS
Posts: 3,884
Default

The ground path for that antenna is: threads of the body of the antenna>nut>toothed washer>mounting surface. The reason for the toothed washer is both for locking, and (hopefully) to bite through any insulating coating on the aluminum mounting surface. Paint a piece of scrap aluminum, drill it for the antenna, mount & torque the nut, then remove & look at the painted surface that was under that toothed washer.

Worrying about the rubber washer is getting off in the weeds, from an electrical standpoint; that side of the mount doesn't really participate in the grounding of the antenna. As others pointed out, it *is* intended to keep water out of the joint.

You can use a dielectric paste (helps keep out moisture/corrosion on the back side) on the nut/washer side of the joint, but unless you live near the ocean it's probably overkill.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-22-2017, 05:50 PM
slngsht slngsht is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Purcellville, VA
Posts: 283
Default

I have zero experience with this... searching to learn. Could we not run a ground wire with eye connector to the thread of the antenna?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-22-2017, 10:18 PM
BobTurner BobTurner is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Livermore, CA
Posts: 6,797
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by slngsht View Post
I have zero experience with this... searching to learn. Could we not run a ground wire with eye connector to the thread of the antenna?
No. You want the coax?s braid-shield electrically attached to a ?ground plane? (usually the aircraft skin around and under the antenna) with as short a connection as possible. Lengths matter. The ground plane does not actually have to be attached to aircraft ground, although it usually is.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-23-2017, 06:40 AM
GalinHdz's Avatar
GalinHdz GalinHdz is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: KSGJ / TJBQ
Posts: 2,039
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
I agree 100% with Walt. This is exactly how we were taught in "Antennas and Transmission Lines" in the USAF.

Granted this was 53 years ago, but these "basic rules" haven't changed.
+1

The laws of Physics have not changed since, forever! Because something "works" doesn't mean it is correct.

__________________
Galin
CP-ASEL-AMEL-IR
FCC Radiotelephone (PG) with Radar Endorsement
2020 Donation made
www.PuertoRicoFlyer.com
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-23-2017, 06:43 AM
slngsht slngsht is offline
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Purcellville, VA
Posts: 283
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobTurner View Post
No. You want the coax?s braid-shield electrically attached to a ?ground plane? (usually the aircraft skin around and under the antenna) with as short a connection as possible. Lengths matter. The ground plane does not actually have to be attached to aircraft ground, although it usually is.
Thank you for the clarification.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:10 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.