VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics


Go Back   VAF Forums > Main > RV General Discussion/News
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Today's Posts

View Poll Results: 6/7/8- do you have a functional canopy/ejection release mechanism?
I have an 8 and HAVE a mechanism to eject the canopy. 12 9.38%
I have an 8 and DO NOT HAVE a mechanism to eject the canopy. 21 16.41%
I have a 6/7 tip up and DO NOT HAVE a functioning canopy release/eject mechanism. 49 38.28%
I have a 6/7 tip up and HAVE a functioning canopy release/eject mechanism. 24 18.75%
I relocated the original 6/7 tip up canopy release/eject mechanism handle. 14 10.94%
I have a 6/7 slide and HAVE a functioning canopy release mechanism. 8 6.25%
Voters: 128. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-19-2016, 07:31 AM
ronschreck's Avatar
ronschreck ronschreck is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
That canopy is like a light weight sail. Once it leaves the aircraft, it will "stop" forward motion almost immediately. The tail is secured to the airframe. It will NOT decelerate quickly. I would expect substantial damage.
I would think that the impact with the ground would cause more damage to the tail and I will be worried about that while floating down under my parachute camopy.
__________________
Ron Schreck
IAC National Judge
RV-8, "Miss Izzy", 2250 Hours - Sold
VAF 2021 Donor
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-19-2016, 07:54 AM
ChiefPilot's Avatar
ChiefPilot ChiefPilot is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 1,565
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ronschreck View Post
I would think that the impact with the ground would cause more damage to the tail and I will be worried about that while floating down under my parachute camopy.
Heh. This.
__________________
Brad Benson, Maplewood MN.
RV-6A N164BL, Flying since Nov 2012!
If you're not making mistakes, you're probably not making anything
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-19-2016, 08:07 AM
Bill Boyd's Avatar
Bill Boyd Bill Boyd is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Landing field "12VA"
Posts: 1,530
Default You may have me there, Mel.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
Oh, but this WAS in the original plans. Mine has been this way for almost 24 years. I hope to never need this option in the air, but if I do, I have it!
The slots are covered with white tape, and no one has ever noticed unless I point it out.
My original plans are ashes, and I ended up by whatever means leaving the skin intact over the hinges - probably a Matronics suggestion for keeping at least some water off the avionics. It's been 20 years and I cannot recall the actual thought process.

As one who has neglected the checklist and had the canopy pop on takeoff once, and elected to fly to my destination that way, I can tell you that at green arc speeds you can neither open nor close the unlatched canopy more than maybe an inch from its assumed trail position in the slipstream. That much is hard data.
__________________
Bill Boyd

Hop-Along Aerodrome (12VA)
RV-6A - N30YD - Built '98 / sold '20
RV-10 - N130YD reserved - under construction

donating monthly to the VAF - thanks, Doug
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-19-2016, 08:54 AM
DanH's Avatar
DanH DanH is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: 08A
Posts: 9,500
Default

FWIW, for -8 builders who really want a canopy guaranteed to depart on command, I'm pretty sure the Showplanes fastback kit will get 'er done. There's a good bit of lift when unlatched in a runup pad slipstream, and side tipping -3 and -4 canopies seem to depart just fine in flight.
__________________
Dan Horton
RV-8 SS
Barrett IO-390
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-19-2016, 04:00 PM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ronschreck View Post
I would think that the impact with the ground would cause more damage to the tail and I will be worried about that while floating down under my parachute camopy.
My post was relating to the tail being damaged substantially in flight before a ditching. You still need a certain amount of control until you get to the surface.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-19-2016, 04:42 PM
ronschreck's Avatar
ronschreck ronschreck is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 1,628
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mel View Post
My post was relating to the tail being damaged substantially in flight before a ditching. You still need a certain amount of control until you get to the surface.
Good point. I missed that. But, if I'm wearing my chute I would jump before ditching.
__________________
Ron Schreck
IAC National Judge
RV-8, "Miss Izzy", 2250 Hours - Sold
VAF 2021 Donor
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 11-19-2016, 06:50 PM
rmarshall234 rmarshall234 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 206
Default

A wingsuiter makes a pretty good sail when they inflate their wings too soon and jump _up_ when leaving the jump plane. They usually don't fair too well when making this mistake but the horizontal manages ok. Never heard of a jump pilot loosing control of the airplane as a result and we're usually dealing with a much longer lever arm. When a parachute opens prematurely and goes over the tail and the jumper goes underneath, now that's a different story. I've seen tails ripped away from the fuselage when that happens.

I'm with Ron Shreck when it comes to jumping however. Any opportunity to save myself at the expense of the airplane and I'm switching roles like "right now". No longer a pilot, now I'm a skydiver.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 11-23-2016, 08:39 AM
BillL BillL is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Central IL
Posts: 5,516
Default

Last bump - Thanks for all who have answered. The stats are pretty stable now so after this bump for the holiday, I will summarize and close in a few days. 109 respondents now.

My decision - for early phase 1 - my mechanism will be fixed under the panel with the option of installing an inflight pull release later. The skin slots will be cut at the later time. So, for now, it will be available only on the ground.
__________________
Bill

RV-7
Lord Kelvin:
“I often say that when you can measure what you are speaking about,
and express it in numbers, you know something about it; but when you
cannot measure it, when you cannot express it in numbers, your knowledge
is of a meager and unsatisfactory kind.”
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 11-23-2016, 09:09 AM
Mel's Avatar
Mel Mel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 10,769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BillL View Post
My decision - for early phase 1 - my mechanism will be fixed under the panel with the option of installing an inflight pull release later. The skin slots will be cut at the later time. So, for now, it will be available only on the ground.
This sounds a little backwards to me. During phase I when you are exploring the limits of the envelope is the time you are more likely to need to get out. This assumes, of course, that you will be wearing a parachute.
__________________
Mel Asberry, DAR since the last century.
EAA Flight Advisor/Tech Counselor, Friend of the RV-1
Recipient of Tony Bingelis Award and Wright Brothers Master Pilot Award
USAF Vet, High School E-LSA Project Mentor.
RV-6 Flying since 1993 (sold)
<rvmel(at)icloud.com>
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12-06-2016, 08:43 PM
morristull morristull is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dubai, United Arab Emirates
Posts: 14
Default

I have some experience in having had the canopy depart from a Giles 202, it happens very quickly, the canopy will most likely hit the tail and horizontal stabilizer with a glancing blow, the damage is typically dents or holes to the leading edges but it was perfectly flyable and was repaired easily.
The canopy departed so quickly that I did not see it happening or notice that it hit my face and forehead on the way past until on the ground.
So regarding a Rv7 tipper, I think the canopy will connect with your head on the way past and hence I am looking for a lightweight helmet. If you are knocked out then other options may be irrelevant.
The VANS design for release handle is good but the placement is poor if you want an normal stack of radios on the centerline, on my RV7, I simply moved the handle and mechanism 3 inches to the right and adapted the pushrods to suit. I have a full stack of radios and the jettison handle is perfectly within reach plus the ability to remove the canopy for maintenance or construction is awesome.
Reply With Quote
Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:18 AM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.