|
-
POSTING RULES

-
Donate yearly (please).
-
Advertise in here!
-
Today's Posts
|
Insert Pics
|

05-27-2016, 07:12 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 421
|
|
Static system
Posting my experience with the static system construction on my 10. I followed Van's directions, but was never happy with how the connections looked in the empennage. I tested the static system and had a leak. It was back in the empennage where the pull rivet attaches to the tubing. I purchased the Cleaveland Aircraft static system. When installed on the airframe the relief from the skin surface looks the same as the Van's pull rivet. The connections inside the empennage are rock solid and it looks so tidy compared to the RTV suggested by the kit. When tested it works like a charm. Will fly it in one month for the real test of the installation. If I ever do this again, I will go directly to the Cleaveland kit.
__________________
Dennis
|

05-28-2016, 10:14 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 9,027
|
|
Well, since you are doing reviews.....
Because of a new instrument panel installation, I just did a static system check on my RV-6A originally built with the cheapo static ports and lines.
Held altitude for 10 minutes with zero change.
Not meaning to slam alternate choices (it is experimental after all). Just pointing out that every installation requires that it be done properly. I have seen people complain about leaks, but never followed the instructions regarding sealing the tube to the rivet....
It doesn't matter what parts you use.... if they aren't installed correctly, it can't be expected to work correctly.
__________________
Opinions, information and comments are my own unless stated otherwise. They do not necessarily represent the direction/opinions of my employer.
Scott McDaniels
Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop Manager
Hubbard, Oregon
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
|

05-28-2016, 11:58 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dallas/Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 5,665
|
|
And be prepared for some airspeed errors to deal with.
__________________
Walt Aronow, DFW, TX (52F)
EXP Aircraft Services LLC
Specializing in RV Condition Inspections, Maintenance, Avionics Upgrades
Dynamic Prop Balancing, Pitot-Static Altmeter/Transponder Certification
FAA Certified Repair Station, AP/IA/FCC GROL, EAA Technical Counselor
Authorized Garmin G3X Dealer/Installer
RV7A built 2004, 1700+ hrs, New Titan IO-370, Bendix Mags
Website: ExpAircraft.com, Email: walt@expaircraft.com, Cell: 972-746-5154
|

05-28-2016, 09:24 PM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: May 2005
Location: X35 - Ocala, FL
Posts: 3,679
|
|
If you use flush ports as were sold quite a few years ago, then you may have airspeed errors, but if your ports protrude from the surface like the pop rivets, there should be no error. I had someone talk to me recently about airspeed errors and I saw he had flush ports. I suggested he cut the factory head off a rivet and glue it on over the flush port and that fixed his airspeed errors.
__________________
Jesse Saint
|

05-29-2016, 06:40 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dogwood Airpark (VA42)
Posts: 2,587
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse
If you use flush ports as were sold quite a few years ago, then you may have airspeed errors, but if your ports protrude from the surface like the pop rivets, there should be no error. I had someone talk to me recently about airspeed errors and I saw he had flush ports. I suggested he cut the factory head off a rivet and glue it on over the flush port and that fixed his airspeed errors.
|
That is exactly what I did to fix the old style flush ports. On the next plane I just made ports from 3/16" round head rivets, drilling a 1/16" hole through the center. The rivet has a small piece of 1/8" aluminum glued over the rivet shank and onto the skin inside the plane to secure. 1/4" tubing is a friction fit over the shank, but I add a little glue there as well.
Simple, light, no leaks and is accurate.
Carl
|

05-29-2016, 10:39 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 431
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse
If you use flush ports as were sold quite a few years ago, then you may have airspeed errors, but if your ports protrude from the surface like the pop rivets, there should be no error. I had someone talk to me recently about airspeed errors and I saw he had flush ports. I suggested he cut the factory head off a rivet and glue it on over the flush port and that fixed his airspeed errors.
|
I used the Safe Air kit and the ports as provided.. I believe that mine would be considered flush. Is that right? Jesse, I just started flying, so how do you know if you are getting airspeed errors? I'm seeing IAS and TAS in the range I would expect for the plane in the current configuration I'm flying.
__________________
John Walker
RV-10 N265WD
"Miss Whiskey Delta"
BPE IO-540, FULL EFII
KMYF, San Diego, Ca.
KEOS, Neosho, MO
Crew Chief
Grove Aero Super Legacy Reno Racer,
twin turbo, IO-540,
full EFII management system!
Race Coordinator STOL Drag coming to Reno, 2019
"so I got that going for me... which is nice."
|

05-29-2016, 10:50 AM
|
 |
Senior Curmudgeon
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse
I suggested he cut the factory head off a rivet and glue it on over the flush port and that fixed his airspeed errors.
|
My plane has the flush ports, and I have thought about adding the factory rivet in a manner similar to what Jesse mentioned.
Instead of just gluing the rivet head on the flat face of the port, I am thinking of creating a socket to hold the shank of the rivet, and gluing it into the socket
I think that drilling out the existing hole in the flat of the existing static port to accommodate the shank of the rivet will give a more secure attachment, also better sealing surface.
I would disconnect the static line before drilling to keep chips out of the system, blow air through the lines as I drill.
Anybody see a problem with this method?
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909
Rv-10, N210LM.
Flying as of 12/4/2010
Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011 
Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.
"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
|

05-29-2016, 11:36 AM
|
 |
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dogwood Airpark (VA42)
Posts: 2,587
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike S
My plane has the flush ports, and I have thought about adding the factory rivet in a manner similar to what Jesse mentioned.
Instead of just gluing the rivet head on the flat face of the port, I am thinking of creating a socket to hold the shank of the rivet, and gluing it into the socket
I think that drilling out the existing hole in the flat of the existing static port to accommodate the shank of the rivet will give a more secure attachment, also better sealing surface.
I would disconnect the static line before drilling to keep chips out of the system, blow air through the lines as I drill.
Anybody see a problem with this method?
|
While I had a decade of trouble free service from the "glue the rivet head on" approach, there is no reason for your proposal not to work. I'd keep the rivet shank very short - no more than 1/8". Recommend getting a handful of rivets as drilling the hole in the middle with a small drill bit may take a few attempts. Be careful not to get JB Weld in the static hole. Using a toothpick or piece of lock wire in the hole while the JB Weld sets works well.
Carl
|

02-14-2018, 10:34 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 212
|
|
New Static Port option ?
https://www.vansaircraft.com/cgi-bin...tatic-kit-port
Is this a new product from Vans? I don't remember seeing it when I was looking at options for static ports. I went with one of the after market products that needed secured in place with adhesive (fuel tank sealant). I'm sure the product I have will be fine, but I like the simple design of the Vans product.
I know the blind rivet supplied with the kit is simple (and works well from what I've heard), but I just didn't like the connection from the blind rivet to the static line.
|

02-14-2018, 02:42 PM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 262
|
|
Static port
There were static ports on my partially completed 7 kit when I purchased it. They are sold by ACS protruding about 1/16" and are 1/4" dia. Well made with a flange riveted inside the fuse with 4 flush rivets and a nice 1/8" FPT thread for the fitting. Pitot/static testing on the ground was great with no leaks. I had a 10 kt IAS error in cruise when flying beside someone whose IAS was accurate. Have tried various sized washers etc to try and correct. I ended up with a thin AN4 washer cut in half stuck in front of the 2 ports with 2 sided tape. I am now about 4 kts slower than my calibrated buddy.
I am going to do the same as Mike S. Cut the ports flush, drill out for the rivet and JB welding it in place. Will crawl down the belly of the beast again to disconnect the lines so as not to get shavings in the system. I am told the rivet is the same as the baffle rivet, which I have lots of. Hoping that this will solve the problem. Will also do a bunch of stall tests to see what the new indicated stall speed is.
Al
|
| Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:46 PM.
|