VansAirForceForums  
Home > VansAirForceForums

- POSTING RULES
- Donate yearly (please).
- Advertise in here!

- Today's Posts | Insert Pics

  #1  
Old 05-27-2016, 07:12 PM
dspender dspender is offline
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Bay City, MI
Posts: 421
Default Static system

Posting my experience with the static system construction on my 10. I followed Van's directions, but was never happy with how the connections looked in the empennage. I tested the static system and had a leak. It was back in the empennage where the pull rivet attaches to the tubing. I purchased the Cleaveland Aircraft static system. When installed on the airframe the relief from the skin surface looks the same as the Van's pull rivet. The connections inside the empennage are rock solid and it looks so tidy compared to the RTV suggested by the kit. When tested it works like a charm. Will fly it in one month for the real test of the installation. If I ever do this again, I will go directly to the Cleaveland kit.
__________________
Dennis
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-28-2016, 10:14 AM
rvbuilder2002's Avatar
rvbuilder2002 rvbuilder2002 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hubbard Oregon
Posts: 9,027
Default Well, since you are doing reviews.....

Because of a new instrument panel installation, I just did a static system check on my RV-6A originally built with the cheapo static ports and lines.

Held altitude for 10 minutes with zero change.

Not meaning to slam alternate choices (it is experimental after all). Just pointing out that every installation requires that it be done properly. I have seen people complain about leaks, but never followed the instructions regarding sealing the tube to the rivet....
It doesn't matter what parts you use.... if they aren't installed correctly, it can't be expected to work correctly.
__________________
Opinions, information and comments are my own unless stated otherwise. They do not necessarily represent the direction/opinions of my employer.

Scott McDaniels
Van's Aircraft Engineering Prototype Shop Manager
Hubbard, Oregon
RV-6A (aka "Junkyard Special ")
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-28-2016, 11:58 AM
Walt's Avatar
Walt Walt is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Dallas/Ft Worth, TX
Posts: 5,665
Default

And be prepared for some airspeed errors to deal with.
__________________
Walt Aronow, DFW, TX (52F)

EXP Aircraft Services LLC
Specializing in RV Condition Inspections, Maintenance, Avionics Upgrades
Dynamic Prop Balancing, Pitot-Static Altmeter/Transponder Certification
FAA Certified Repair Station, AP/IA/FCC GROL, EAA Technical Counselor
Authorized Garmin G3X Dealer/Installer
RV7A built 2004, 1700+ hrs, New Titan IO-370, Bendix Mags
Website: ExpAircraft.com, Email: walt@expaircraft.com, Cell: 972-746-5154
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-28-2016, 09:24 PM
Jesse's Avatar
Jesse Jesse is offline
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: X35 - Ocala, FL
Posts: 3,679
Default

If you use flush ports as were sold quite a few years ago, then you may have airspeed errors, but if your ports protrude from the surface like the pop rivets, there should be no error. I had someone talk to me recently about airspeed errors and I saw he had flush ports. I suggested he cut the factory head off a rivet and glue it on over the flush port and that fixed his airspeed errors.
__________________
Jesse Saint
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-29-2016, 06:40 AM
Carl Froehlich's Avatar
Carl Froehlich Carl Froehlich is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dogwood Airpark (VA42)
Posts: 2,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse View Post
If you use flush ports as were sold quite a few years ago, then you may have airspeed errors, but if your ports protrude from the surface like the pop rivets, there should be no error. I had someone talk to me recently about airspeed errors and I saw he had flush ports. I suggested he cut the factory head off a rivet and glue it on over the flush port and that fixed his airspeed errors.
That is exactly what I did to fix the old style flush ports. On the next plane I just made ports from 3/16" round head rivets, drilling a 1/16" hole through the center. The rivet has a small piece of 1/8" aluminum glued over the rivet shank and onto the skin inside the plane to secure. 1/4" tubing is a friction fit over the shank, but I add a little glue there as well.

Simple, light, no leaks and is accurate.

Carl
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-29-2016, 10:39 AM
Bluelabel's Avatar
Bluelabel Bluelabel is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: San Diego, Ca
Posts: 431
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse View Post
If you use flush ports as were sold quite a few years ago, then you may have airspeed errors, but if your ports protrude from the surface like the pop rivets, there should be no error. I had someone talk to me recently about airspeed errors and I saw he had flush ports. I suggested he cut the factory head off a rivet and glue it on over the flush port and that fixed his airspeed errors.
I used the Safe Air kit and the ports as provided.. I believe that mine would be considered flush. Is that right? Jesse, I just started flying, so how do you know if you are getting airspeed errors? I'm seeing IAS and TAS in the range I would expect for the plane in the current configuration I'm flying.
__________________
John Walker
RV-10 N265WD
"Miss Whiskey Delta"
BPE IO-540, FULL EFII
KMYF, San Diego, Ca.
KEOS, Neosho, MO

Crew Chief
Grove Aero Super Legacy Reno Racer,
twin turbo, IO-540,
full EFII management system
!

Race Coordinator STOL Drag coming to Reno, 2019
"so I got that going for me... which is nice."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-29-2016, 10:50 AM
Mike S's Avatar
Mike S Mike S is offline
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Dayton Airpark, NV A34
Posts: 15,408
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jesse View Post
I suggested he cut the factory head off a rivet and glue it on over the flush port and that fixed his airspeed errors.
My plane has the flush ports, and I have thought about adding the factory rivet in a manner similar to what Jesse mentioned.

Instead of just gluing the rivet head on the flat face of the port, I am thinking of creating a socket to hold the shank of the rivet, and gluing it into the socket

I think that drilling out the existing hole in the flat of the existing static port to accommodate the shank of the rivet will give a more secure attachment, also better sealing surface.

I would disconnect the static line before drilling to keep chips out of the system, blow air through the lines as I drill.

Anybody see a problem with this method?
__________________
Mike Starkey
VAF 909

Rv-10, N210LM.

Flying as of 12/4/2010

Phase 1 done, 2/4/2011

Sold after 240+ wonderful hours of flight.

"Flying the airplane is more important than radioing your plight to a person on the ground incapable of understanding or doing anything about it."
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-29-2016, 11:36 AM
Carl Froehlich's Avatar
Carl Froehlich Carl Froehlich is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dogwood Airpark (VA42)
Posts: 2,587
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike S View Post
My plane has the flush ports, and I have thought about adding the factory rivet in a manner similar to what Jesse mentioned.

Instead of just gluing the rivet head on the flat face of the port, I am thinking of creating a socket to hold the shank of the rivet, and gluing it into the socket

I think that drilling out the existing hole in the flat of the existing static port to accommodate the shank of the rivet will give a more secure attachment, also better sealing surface.

I would disconnect the static line before drilling to keep chips out of the system, blow air through the lines as I drill.

Anybody see a problem with this method?
While I had a decade of trouble free service from the "glue the rivet head on" approach, there is no reason for your proposal not to work. I'd keep the rivet shank very short - no more than 1/8". Recommend getting a handful of rivets as drilling the hole in the middle with a small drill bit may take a few attempts. Be careful not to get JB Weld in the static hole. Using a toothpick or piece of lock wire in the hole while the JB Weld sets works well.

Carl
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-14-2018, 10:34 AM
Mudfly Mudfly is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Alpharetta, Ga
Posts: 212
Default New Static Port option ?

https://www.vansaircraft.com/cgi-bin...tatic-kit-port

Is this a new product from Vans? I don't remember seeing it when I was looking at options for static ports. I went with one of the after market products that needed secured in place with adhesive (fuel tank sealant). I'm sure the product I have will be fine, but I like the simple design of the Vans product.
I know the blind rivet supplied with the kit is simple (and works well from what I've heard), but I just didn't like the connection from the blind rivet to the static line.
__________________
Shawn Edwards
RV-14A (140174)
www.myrv14build.blogspot.com
2020 VAF Donation
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-14-2018, 02:42 PM
RV7 To Go RV7 To Go is offline
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 262
Default Static port

There were static ports on my partially completed 7 kit when I purchased it. They are sold by ACS protruding about 1/16" and are 1/4" dia. Well made with a flange riveted inside the fuse with 4 flush rivets and a nice 1/8" FPT thread for the fitting. Pitot/static testing on the ground was great with no leaks. I had a 10 kt IAS error in cruise when flying beside someone whose IAS was accurate. Have tried various sized washers etc to try and correct. I ended up with a thin AN4 washer cut in half stuck in front of the 2 ports with 2 sided tape. I am now about 4 kts slower than my calibrated buddy.

I am going to do the same as Mike S. Cut the ports flush, drill out for the rivet and JB welding it in place. Will crawl down the belly of the beast again to disconnect the lines so as not to get shavings in the system. I am told the rivet is the same as the baffle rivet, which I have lots of. Hoping that this will solve the problem. Will also do a bunch of stall tests to see what the new indicated stall speed is.

Al
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 PM.


The VAFForums come to you courtesy Delta Romeo, LLC. By viewing and participating in them you agree to build your plane using standardized methods and practices and to fly it safely and in accordance with the laws governing the country you are located in.